Preview

Capital Punishment: a Social Injustice or a Necessary Deffense

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1432 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Punishment: a Social Injustice or a Necessary Deffense
Does killing ever justify murder? Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the act of killing criminals for heinous acts that they’ve committed, generally homicide. I believe that capital punishment is a social injustice because it is unconstitutional and unethical. Those against capital punishment question the surety of the offender’s guilt, economic costs, and the supposedly unbiased judges. There are two sides to every coin though, and there are many reasons to support capital punishment as well. Those who agree with capital punishment argue that it dissuades others from attempting similar crimes and is a fair retribution for lives lost. Of all the varied topics included when discussing capital punishment, one of the most frightening to think about is the possibility that the wrong man may have died. Is it possible that an innocent person could be killed mistakenly? No recorded instances of such have happened, but does that mean that it couldn’t? A study from 2000 shows that two out of three of the men on death row the year before were freed due to a judicial error. Even more surprising, 7% of the men on death row were proven completely innocent. If their innocence was found any later, many of them could have been punished unfairly. The judicial system is as foolproof for mistakes as it can be, but it is most definitely not perfect. Fingerprints and witnesses can prove past reasonable doubt in ordinary cases, but fingerprints can be replicated and witnesses lie. To be sentenced to death, or to be determined guilty in general, you have to be proved guilty with no reasonable chance of innocence, but some cases show that there may not really be any way to be 100% sure. Whether or not the defendant is guilty can only be absolutely proven if a confession or video is provided. The outcome of the trial may simply be based on the quality of the lawyers fighting for either side, and human lives can’t be risked on such unstable grounds. Is it worth
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Dexter: Truly Guilty Of Murder
    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Dexter: Truly Guilty Of Murder

    If any criminal is sentenced to death in this country, it is first and foremost because of sufficient evidence of their actions, yet whether the accused truly deserves death each time remains to be seen in the U.S., as opposed to Dexter. The T.V. series Dexter constantly shows that you must have proper evidence to kill someone. In the Pilot episode of Dexter, the main character surveys a murderer who escaped imprisonment due to a faulty search warrant by police. He breaks into his home to find proof of his crime. Once Dexter confirms he is guilty by seeing videos of girls being raped by the murderer, Dexter captures him, and the man then admits that he killed a woman and has zero remorse for what he had done (Dexter). Here it is evident that the suspect deserved death: he continually abused women and even murdered one, and there was clear proof of his actions. The…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Definitions For Ethics GCSE

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Definitions For Ethics GCSE

    Some suggest that Capital Punishment is not the way to go as sooner or later people will get killed because of mistakes or flaws in the justice system, for example witnesses, prosecutors and jurors them being human can all make mistakes (Alexander Pope) “To err is human”. When these human mistakes are coupled with flaws in the system it is inevitable that innocent people will be convicted of crimes. Where capital punishment is used mistakes cannot be put right.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment Socratic Dialogue
    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Capital Punishment Socratic Dialogue

    In May 1990 Jesse Tafero was convicted for the murders of two florida highway patrol officers and was executed by electric chair. This conviction was overturned in 1992 after a recreation of the crime scene revealed another person had committed the murders. In 1974 James Bain was convicted of breaking and entering, rape, and kidnapping and was sentenced to life in prison. This conviction was overturned in 2009 after he was found innocent through DNA evidence.…

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Capital Punishment: Looking at Both Sides
    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Capital Punishment: Looking at Both Sides

    Zimring, F. (2003). The contradictions of American capital punishment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 6 Apr. 2010.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Death Penalty Be Allowed
    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should Death Penalty Be Allowed

    There is always the problem of someone being wrongly convicted. “At least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent, according to the first major study to attempt to calculate how often states get it wrong in their wielding of the ultimate punishment”(Pilkington). Even though the number of innocently convicted people is not that high once an innocent man or woman has been executed there is no way to undo what has been done. The criminal justice system is not perfect and they too sometimes make mistakes. “Whether our criminal justice system has executed an innocent man should no longer be an open question. We don't know how often it happens, but we know it has happened. Cameron Todd Willingham's case proves that. As long as our system of justice makes mistakes -- including the ultimate mistake -- we cannot continue executing people” (Scheck). Sometimes people make mistakes but innocent people being convicted and executed for a crime they didn’t commit is a mistake that can be prevented by making sure the death penalty isn’t an option for punishment any more. Innocent people don’t have to worry about this anymore if the death penalty is no longer possible there are also other options of punishment besides…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Writing to Argue: Capital Punishment
    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Writing to Argue: Capital Punishment

    Leading on from this argument, there is also the undeniable possibility that someone completely innocent could be wrongly accused and consequently put to death. For example, the publicity surrounding the case of Stefan Kiszko perfectly illustrates how wrongful convictions can and do occur. The guiltless man was unfairly sent to prison for the rape and murder of Lesley Molseed. Sixteen years later Kiszko’s innocence had been proven beyond doubts due to advances in DNA evidence. This ‘miscarriage of justice’ (as Kiszko’s MP described it) was reprehensible, abominable and barbaric. Imagine how much more of a scandal this would have been if this blameless man had been killed? Although some people believe that advances in forensic science may prevent this from happening today; nothing can guarantee that innocent people…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty: Prisons And Inequality
    • 3395 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Death Penalty: Prisons And Inequality

    Regardless of its precise causes, the effects of high incarceration rates on inequality are now substantial. Although the…

    • 3395 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment and Sensitive Societal Issue
    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Capital Punishment and Sensitive Societal Issue

    Punishment, Witness, and dehumanization are common in the world today illustrated in poems such as, “Punishment” by Seamus Heaney and “Capital Punishment” by Sherman Alexie. The poems give the world a different perspectives based on the authors viewpoint, yet both authors seem to favor punishment. Therefore everyone in their life deserves to be punished based on the authors work or even a witness for one reason or another to speak for something they have done or witness. These authors wanted to show a strong feeling towards punishment whether or not the crime was minor or major. In “Punishment” the speaker was a witness to dehumanizing punishment of the bog women. In “Capital Punishment” the cook was a witness to a cruel punishment. Even though both authors focused on different types of punishment they both expressed how witnessing and dehumanization have a vital role in different situations. Can punishment and race have factors that can change one another? Can the ethnicity of a criminal effect the severity of the punishment bestowed upon them? The ethnicity of a criminal or witness can determine how cruel and usual a punishment can be towards the criminal or witness.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Morality Of Capital Punishment In The United States
    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Morality Of Capital Punishment In The United States

    Although many view capital punishment or the death penalty as cruel and unusual punishment it is still strongly used today in the United States. In today’s time people discuss capital punishment when referring to criminals such as the Mason Family, OJ Simpson, Bonnie and Clyde, Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, Tedd Bundy, Amy Fisher, and Al Capone who were all hardcore criminals. However not everyone views capital punishments as cruel and unusual, some have religious factors to consider. Most major world religions take a puzzling position on the morality of capital punishment. Religions are often based on a body of teachings the standards of present-day Western civilization, and the Old Testament. A few public…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Wild Justice: The Death And Resurrection Of Capital Punishment Essay
    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A Wild Justice: The Death And Resurrection Of Capital Punishment Essay

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment Then and Now
    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capital Punishment Then and Now

    A punishment is the negative consequence forced upon someone by a group or person. Normally a punishment is a consequence of a rule being broken. A rule is any type of vehicle, or guide to ensure certain actions or behavior. Rules are often just written or spoken, and provide guidelines for human activity. A rule is made by higher authority, like a Parent, King, Minister, Dictator, or a Teacher. Rules are enforced with punishments, to deter people from breaking them. Besides punishments being used to deter people; they could also be used to isolate, retribution, and rehabilitate criminals. The question that is related to this essay is; what was the goal of older punishment and what is the goal of modern punishment?…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment: A Crime Deterrent?
    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capital Punishment: A Crime Deterrent?

    The Easy Way Out On February 4, 1983 in Corpus Christi, a convenience store clerk, Wanda Lopez was stabbed to death with an 8-inch buck knife. The police had found Deluna hiding under a truck a few blocks away, and several witnesses told the cops that he looked like the killer. Deluna always maintained that he didn’t do it, but waited until his trial was imminent to allege that someone named Carlos Hernandez was the real killer. The lead prosecutor in the case, Steve Shiwetz, dismissed Delunas claim calling Hernandez a ‘’phantom’’ and ‘’figment’’ of Delunas imagination. He was executed in 1989. A detective was hired and it took him exactly one day to track down Carlos Hernandez, who was a repeat offender with a history of slashing women with his buck knife and looked alike to Carlos Deluna. The detective also discovered that Hernandez bragged about killing the clerk and that the state had executed the wrong person. Hernandez died in prison of natural causes after being jailed for attacking his neighbor with a knife. Good morning/afternoon Miss.Robitaille and fellow classmates.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment Controversy: The Death Penalty Debate
    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Capital Punishment Controversy: The Death Penalty Debate

    There are few policies that produce as much debate, controversy and emotion in this country as the death penalty. Capital punishment has been around in this country since colonial times when people were killed for practicing witchcraft and today the death penalty is legal in 31 states. Since 1976, 1414 people have been executed in the U.S. (deathpenaltyinfo.org). People who favor capital punishment believe that if someone brutally take's another person's life then they should lose their own right to life. However, in taking a closer look at the death penalty, there are many problems associated with it such as that is is morally wrong, the botching of executions, the execution of innocent people, and the fact that it is a flawed system…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment- the Solution?
    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Capital Punishment- the Solution?

    A much debated topic in today’s society and a rather controversial issue is capital punishment, or the execution of a convicted criminal as a punishment for crimes known as capital offences. These may include murder, treason, drug trafficking and human trafficking depending on the country that is being referred to. The two opposing arguments about this issue are whether or not it should be allowed. Both sides offer a credible and justified resolution to this debate. However, as an unbiased individual, my say is that this form of punishment should be practiced.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment In America
    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capital Punishment In America

    Killing is wrong. It’s something that has been driven into us since childhood its indisputable truth. So why is capital punishment allowed? For those of you that don’t know what capital punishment is, it’s the death penalty the murder of a people in our society who are mentally or emotionally unstable, have anger management issues or simply made a plain mistake. These are many of the reasons that account for the homicides that take place each year, these are people that should have the chance to change yet have those chances taken away from them. Capital Punishment is just not humane and should not be legal.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics