Preview

Capitalism, Which Is The Moral Social System?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2151 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capitalism, Which Is The Moral Social System?
Lachezar Tsenov
BUS340
Capitalism or Socialism – Which is the moral social system?

There are two major systems that compete for the name of moral social system. Capitalistic and socialistic ideas are quite different but both of them have a lot of supporters. Capitalism is about you pursuing your own goals and your goals only without caring about the others in the system. On the other hand, Socialism is about you pursuing the goals of you and the others at the same time. The question which system is the moral one is of high importance for the future of our world. Egoism is the word that best describes Capitalism. This system lies on the idea that people are born to become selfish and that it is our
…show more content…

Egoism can be considered moral only if we accept that the human nature is selfish. Then acting as you are supposed to act, being selfish, is not morally wrong. Indeed, it is moral to follow your nature. Altruism, in contrast, can be considered moral if you do not take for granted that the human nature is selfish. Living for the good of the whole society, including you, is for sure morally right. But how can we say what human nature is? There is no technology created to determine or to research the so called human nature. All we have are assumptions, nothing else. And it is sad when you open an “Intro to Politics” or the “Economics” textbooks to see stated everywhere that human nature is selfish. Why should we take the fact that the human nature is egoistic for granted? How is it proven? The answer is that we don’t have to take for granted something that is not true. If all the people were selfish by nature, how come altruism exists? How come so many people help each other? How come there are so many remarkable acts of helping that are connected by no way to gains or benefits? The obvious answer is that there is no such thing as selfish human nature. Grigori Perelman solved the Poincare conjecture, one of the seven mathematical millennium problems, stated by the Clay Mathematical Institute in 2000. The reward for doing that was $ 1 000 000 but he declined them. If he was selfish by nature he would’ve taken the money but he didn’t. He didn’t dedicate big part of his life to receive something back. He didn’t solve it to gain something. What about Bethoven? He was considered crazy and he didn’t earn much for what he did during his life. However, Bethoven wrote this wonderful music without expecting anything back. Some of the music was done for Elise, the woman he was in love with. He knew that there is no chance to be with her but still he wrote “fur Elise” because he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Capitalism is the gasoline to the car of the first-world nations. It is what sadly seems in America and many other countries alike to make the Earth go around. This has become an addiction and disease of America. Everyone has been victim to the issues of capitalism as it has been deeply engrained and rooted at birth. We start off wanting just a few things but once we find out there is so much more out there we get locked into the material things of life.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism is a system in which private individuals can own businesses and goods and in which production, and is also called a free enterprise system.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism is a system that forces the individual to play by its rules. These events or public changes to society are challenges that either help or hinder a group, a society or the individual. Events reinforce a person’s survival instincts and the capitalist is always in the middle trying to figure out how they could make money off of these events/challenges. Capitalism existence is inevitable but we allow it to further take advantages of the struggling and the greedy, the spirt of capitalism. This has been emphasized and drilled into the individual to believe they have a “duty” to this capitalism- to be rich and find riches at all cost. “…many diffuse, discrete, more or less present and occasionally absent concrete individual phenomena, which are arranged according to those one-sidedly emphasized viewpoints into a unified analytical construct (p.274).” This is simply one sided, in which it enriches more of the 1 percent. This is where the “ideal types” become the influenced objective causes of actions. We work harder for the idea that we will rise only to indebt ourselves more and to…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psy Egoism

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Previously, I briefly gave a crude definition of Psychological Egoism, which I will now provide a more exhaustive explanation. Psychological Egoism is the assumed fact that the only actions people are capable of desiring and or pursuing are committed in their own self interest. Frequently, individuals appear to be acting unselfishly but in reality they are just taking these interest of others as means to promoting their own self-interest. This Alludes to the fact that an egoist believes that purely altruistic and benevolent actions do not exist. Psychological Egoism is often confused with Ethical Egoism. At first glance these two theories look very similar yet there is a major difference. Ethical egoism is the belief that all men ought to pursue their own desires and self-interest. The word “ought” in the previous sentence clearly portrays the difference of the two egoisms. A more precise sector of Psychological Egoism is hedonism. Hedonism is the belief that all individuals have one definitive motive in their own voluntary behavior, which is the desire for ones own pleasure and simultaneously avoiding unpleasant experiences. A Hedonist goal is to have the net gain of pleasure minus unpleasant experiences to be as high as possible. Another factor of Psychological Egoism is self-deception. This is the thought process…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theories Of Altruism

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Egoism is the act of behaving self-interestedly, and is perceived as a negative trait even though it can be seen as a tool of survival (Rosenstand, 2003: 131). However, there is an opposing theory, which is altruism. Altruism is defined as a concern for the welfare of others and is considered virtuous (Rosenstand, 2003: 150). We are often made aware of heroes who risk their lives for others and these heroes inspire many. We are encouraged to be altruistic, early in our lives. Nonetheless, one notices how altruist acts usually include rewards, even if it’s just a simple thank you. This leads to questions such as, does true altruism exist, or do people always have a motive as to why they perform altruistically?…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Egoism—specifically ethical egoism—argues that our moral evaluations should be made in terms of our desires and goals. Something that promotes what I want is regarded as right; something that interferes with what I want, or prevents me from reaching my goals, is regarded as wrong.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The research question proposed is rather abstract: which social system is “moral.” The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines “moral” as “relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior”, “conforming to a standard of right behavior” and “expressing or teaching a conception of right behavior”. The common word between all definitions is “right”. What is “right” and what is “wrong” depends on the individual values of each person. The same dictionary describes “social system” as “the patterned series of interrelationships existing between individuals, groups and institutions and forming a coherent whole”. Therefore, a thorough examination on the morality of the two systems must consider the relationships of people with other people and with institutions. It must also evaluate the coherence of each society. This essay will attempt to explore the moral assumptions behind both systems. It will describe the moral pro-s and con-s of capitalism and socialism and their practical implementations. It will then present an opinion…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism and Socialism are very different. Capitalism, for instance, is an economic system where the production of goods is regulated by the people as well as the selling of goods. People own most of the companies, not the government. Their market is reliant on supply and demand. This causes companies that are incompetent to go out of business, and efficient companies to prosper. It also offers the consumer a better quality good for the least amount of money. Socialism on the other hand, is very different. In a Socialist economy, the government owns most of the prosperous companies. The government then regulates how much of a product is produced, distributed and how much the good will cost the consumer.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over the superior socioeconomic system has gone on for over 100 years, and there seems to never be any consensus. In fact, the debate has become so heated that wars have been fought in order to prove supremacy—i.e. the Cold War fought primarily between the USA and the USSR. On one end of this debate lies the communist party that’s goal is to eliminate the gap between the rich and the poor by creating social and economic equality between classes. The opposing party is the capitalists, who strive to for free market economy and individual enterprise. Socialism is the middle ground as it is a mix of both private corporations and government run facilities.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical Egoism

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Yet while being an ethical egoist, you can still help others when your self-interest coincides with the well-beings of others. Of course no one wants to live in a cold, heartless world so by being able to still help others would stop the world from becoming completely selfish. You can give food to a homeless shelter and in return receive a gift card to your favorite store. So you got what you needed and helped you out the best and yet you were still help to someone else. Because whether it comes down to your and the person next to you giving food to the homeless, someone will benefit from doing so, so the homeless still will get fed.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism And Socialism

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capitalism and socialism are economic systems that both began in 1750. In my opinion, capitalism is a better system because it includes private property and capital accumulations. Capitalism affords economic freedom. It also affords consumer choice and economic growth. Capitalism and socialism are somewhat opposing schools of thought in economics. The central arguments in the socialism vs. capitalism debate are about economic equality and the role of government.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism Vs Healthcare

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socialism and capitalism are, without a doubt, two somewhat opposing economic thoughts and system. Most of the arguments that come up when debating about these systems center on equality and the role of government in our economy. Socialists' beliefs include the idea that inequality is inferior to the success of the economy and society, and that…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So what? If we only act altruistic to make us happy, and that’s in our self-interest, we are still acting in a moral sense that transcends Hobbes’ views and the sordid views of egoism.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This suggests human moral choices should be made with only their own selfish interests at heart. If we do the best for ourselves, it will benefit others. The problem with this theory is that a person may have both selfish and good intentions when committing and act of kindness. Since ethical egoism only allows one option—self-interest, it is perpetuating flawed logic that would not hold up if reason is applied to the theory. Also, ethical egoism is an “arbitrary doctrine, in the same way that racism is arbitrary…” and it violates the “Principle of Equal Treatment”…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Me, me, me

    • 708 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Considering the world we live in, one can not realistically believe that ethical egoism, in other words the idea that "being selfish is not just sensible, but morally good" (Eccles, N. 2013), is the right thing. Imagine how much worse the reality of 20,000 children dying would be if everyone in the world only takes care of themselves. No charity organisations would exist, and no-one would lend a helping hand to those in need. The 20,000 would grow exponentially, leaving the world a much worse place (although utilitarians may disagree and say that it is a good thing!), devoid of hope and optimism. I can therefore say that I disagree with the argument of Ayn Rand when she says that there is virtue in being selfish. Her argument about altruism being evil (Eccles, N. 2013) is quite irrational, since doing something good to help others, and by doing so making the world a better place, is by no means evil.…

    • 708 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics