When writing about the dogs themselves, the author uses a kind, gentle tone with which the reader can empathize. Using words like “thoughtless”, “negligent”, and “careless,” the author suggests the irresponsible owners who allow their pets to “run wild” are not suitable to care for them. The tone is made obvious by the connotations of the words. For example, the word “thoughtless” denotes “doing things without thinking them through”. However, the connotation is insulting owners, accusing them of indifference. The author states, “they thoughtlessly allow their beloved animals to run wild”, which is quite contradictory. The pets are beloved, yet the owners allow them to freely wander. The author’s wording …show more content…
The powerful phrases prove the author’s love for the pets. Since he/she loves the pets, the tone of frustrated is really enforced when the author accuses the owners of negligent behavior. The author also may be trying to provoke empathy in the reader. The phrase “deep bond” is very personal. It might trigger the reader to remember an animal they had a bond to in the past. The author then strikes the reader by saying “what if an animal were to run out in front of a moving vehicle?” That reader connection is turned into possible hatred to these irresponsible owners; what if that had been their dog? The tone then becomes sly instead of caring. The author formed an understanding between the reader and the animal for the sake of breaking it to prove a point to the reader - that pets should be kept on leashes for their own safety. This also suggests the author’s character. He/She loves the animals, but would still create bad visuals solely for the