Images were categorized into three groups: pain-related, neutral, and ambiguous. Examples were included in Appendix (see Figure 1 – 3). Pain-related images clearly depict people with injuries or experiencing pain (e.g., a man holding his leg in pain, with a facial expression of pain; a woman holding his shoulder, with a facial expression of pain). Neutral images feature people without visible injuries or pain in everyday situations (e.g., a man sitting at a desk working; a man playing cricket). Ambiguous images picture people in uncommon situations or positions (e.g., a man lying on the ground, with no facial expression of pain; two men supporting a woman, with no facial expression of pain), which may or may not have injurious or painful causes. Ten ambiguous images were first collected using the google search engine. Then each ambiguous image was matched to one neutral image and one pain-related image on number of people present in the scene, both foreground and background. No significant difference on number of people present was found among three image groups (F(2, 27) = .11, p = .901, p2 =
Images were categorized into three groups: pain-related, neutral, and ambiguous. Examples were included in Appendix (see Figure 1 – 3). Pain-related images clearly depict people with injuries or experiencing pain (e.g., a man holding his leg in pain, with a facial expression of pain; a woman holding his shoulder, with a facial expression of pain). Neutral images feature people without visible injuries or pain in everyday situations (e.g., a man sitting at a desk working; a man playing cricket). Ambiguous images picture people in uncommon situations or positions (e.g., a man lying on the ground, with no facial expression of pain; two men supporting a woman, with no facial expression of pain), which may or may not have injurious or painful causes. Ten ambiguous images were first collected using the google search engine. Then each ambiguous image was matched to one neutral image and one pain-related image on number of people present in the scene, both foreground and background. No significant difference on number of people present was found among three image groups (F(2, 27) = .11, p = .901, p2 =