Preview

Categorical Imperative Kant

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1060 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Categorical Imperative Kant
German philosopher Immanuel Kant, father of the categorical imperative, seems to have found me in the right season of life. German philosopher, Immanuel Kant, is considered by many to be a central figure in modern philosophy due to his contributions made to ethics, epistemology, metaphysics and aesthetics. Arguably, his most notable contribution is fathering the categorical imperative, a command of reason not based upon the desires of any one person. Kant also comments on various topics including gifts of fortune, good will, “perfect happiness” and the intrinsic value of a human being. As a 19 year-old college student, I find myself in a transitionary stage of life; the decisions I make today determine the direction of the remainder of my life. …show more content…
Kant does not say it is wrong to use someone as a means. Instead, he said it is wrong to use someone as a mere means, indicating that it is immoral to use someone solely for what they can do for us. Nature bestows each of us with “gifts of nature,” as Kant refers to them. Qualities of temperament range from intelligence, wit, courage, perseverance, or decisiveness. According to Kant, these gifts of nature require “good will…present to correct their influence on the mind…” In other words, those with an immoral character could abuse these gifts of nature for wrongdoing. Kant emphasizes the importance of possessing a good will; a good will is “good in itself” according to Kant, regardless of what it does or does not …show more content…
One of these three higher pleasures described by Mill is acts which engage one’s moral sentiments. Thus, Mill claims that participating in activities appealing to one’s values — like compassion — open the gate to genuine happiness. Kant draws a similar conclusion, saying that we must put the needs and desires of others before our own in order for society as a whole to achieve optimum levels of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I viewed the suicide tourist video open-mindedly and aware of the 1990 Patient Self-Determination ACT (PSDA). Self-Determination is a very difficult topic of discussion because it is closely tied to one’s culture, beliefs and religious practices. The conversation does not usually occur until after a loved one has become terminally ill and cannot make that decision for themselves, placing the decision in the hands of family members. Mr. Ewert stated that people may think that he is playing God by making the decision to end his life and yet, he would not be alive now if it warrant for technology keeping him alive and that doctors and nurses play God every day when saving per-mature babies and performing transplants. Mr. Ewart’s decision to…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Kant vs Mill

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill’s theory of Utilitarianism relates moral actions to those that result in the greatest happiness. This explains Mill’s theory on morality. When happiness is reached, there is pleasure and the absence of pain. Pleasure results from the actions higher in utility. Mill believes there’s a difference between higher and lower qualities of pleasure verses quantity of them. If a pleasure were high, a person would choose it over another pleasure that may come with suffering. Saying this he means a person will choose the higher good. He also speaks about the confusion of happiness with satisfaction. The only way to judge a pleasure is to fully understand the quality of pleasure.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Through out my essay I will be explaining the approaches of the great philosophers, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held. I’m going to start with Immanuel…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Aristotle every activity aims at some good, which is happiness, and that we should do so by aiming for excellence through rational activities. Happiness is being able to do well in life and live well; however, he argues that many believe happiness has to do with your wealth, pleasure, or honor. People who are wealthy are not aiming for the good they are simply seeking it for another purpose. For example, when you have a lot of money and you want the new iPhone. Well now that you purchased the phone you have to purchase a new case and a new charger and then the next best iPhone becomes available for purchase and repeat. There is no end to the cycle of wealth because people are always seeking other means, which happiness is the…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Work Cited

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mill’s theory of higher pleasures states that when it comes down to pleasures and satisfaction, people tend to set these empirical grounds for these…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An excerpt from Exploring Ethics, best exemplifies the comparison from Mill and Kant. Kant's ethical system concentrates exclusively on the reason for an action and does not take into account its results, Mill's system focuses only on consequences. Mill's explained "that this is the singularity is the basis in which you use to judge morality, with those being morally right being those that will manufacture the most happiness because in the end all humans seek happiness above everything else." He also argued that fame, money, and virtue could not replace happiness but could be used to obtain it. Mill’s believed that happiness is the guiding arch that drives…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    kant

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant’s diagnoses the human condition as human’s frailty and impurity when distinguishing between one’s self interested inclinations and moral duty. Humans were “…finite beings with our individual needs…yet we [were] also rational beings, and for Kant that include[d]…the recognition of moral obligations” (Stevenson and Haberman p.155). The contrast and ever-apparent strain between these opposing sides of human nature fuel Kant’s diagnosis of human’s frailty. In Kant’s conception of human reason and action, he distinguished between categorical and hypothetical imperatives which displayed the human struggles regarding what decisions were morally right. Self interested desires, “…which involve[ed] only the selection of means to satisfy one’s own desire” (p.151) could be defined as a hypothetical imperative. However, categorical imperative claims “…that morality is fundamentally a function of [one’s] reason, not just [one’s] feelings” (p.151). Knowing what was morally right and doing what was morally right was the depravity of human nature, the choice of choosing one’s own happiness over their obligations to those who surround them. The desire for instant gratification from any action hinders human’s consideration of longer-term self-interest. The difficulty arises when the one must decide to postpone immediate satisfaction in the interest of future goals; a “…balance to strike between living for the moment and planning for the future….” (p.155) must be reached. Human’s struggles with moral decisions and personal gain exemplify their…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major diversion, conflict, and controversy comes across from the access to health care in the United States. The essence of this dispute is whether medical treatment is a right, therefore all citizens should have the ability to use it or a commodity so society should have to pay or limits of charity. Throughout this deliberation I will be using philosophers and their philosophical concepts to support each side of the debate.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill is a utilitarian philosopher who lives by the Greatest Happiness Principle, in which there is a clear distinction between both lower and higher pleasures. Though thoroughly explained, one must also question the justification of these pleasures. Many of these beliefs leave the reader hanging on the edge, with further questions that need to be answered. What is the exact distinction between the lower and higher pleasures? And how are higher pleasures measured as most valuable? How clearly is Mill’s view of lower and higher pleasures justified?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Mill

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This view forms the basis of the contrasting argument between him and Kant .Mill principle of `utility also known as the greatest happiness is that, when people act out of duty it justifies the utilitarian principle as a foundation of morals.It explains that actions are right in proportions and promote overall human happiness of everything or anything that can ;possibly tolerate pain.it focus on the consequence of actions.Not on rights or ethical sentiments.it is best to be cultivated and noble…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Categorical Imperatives

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Furthermore, Kant intensified that since we humans are rational agents, we are free to make decisions freely, set goals, and guide conduct by reason. Therefore, if we are rational agents that make immoral decisions then we must be ready for the consequences that follow. There are no…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant on Will

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant’s argument that an act out of duty can not be in conflict with itself or with any other will acting out of duty derives from the concept he puts forth of the internal principle. A will cannot conflict itself if it determines itself a priori. By determining its morals before the benefit of experience, it determines itself simply that it exists as it is. Intuitively, anything pure cannot conflict with itself just as the idea of good cannot conflict with itself and be somehow partly bad (437). Thus by simply being, without any other influence determining it, the will is an end in itself (437). A will acting out of duty, or in other words on its own internal principles, can not conflict with another will simply because it does not depend on the other will. In order to conflict, something must first interact. And if two wills are acting in accordance with duty, then they each recognize each other as an end in itself, and therefore do not interact on the level of morality (438). Just as a self-sufficient village with no roads leading to or from can not conflict with another village simply because it needs not and cannot interact, a self-sufficient will, and therefore determined with no external influence, can also not conflict with anther will acting out of duty. Though if something is not self-sufficient, it requires another object to fulfill its ends. As with the village, if it needs to conquer a neighboring village’s farmland in order to feed itself, conflict arises. Similarly, should a will not be determined a priori, but instead based on external circumstances, then a will must use another will to fulfill its needs, and therefore would conflict with the autonomy of the second…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Moral Argument

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant said to do ones duty is to achieve the Summum Bonum (the highest good).…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays