Kant does not say it is wrong to use someone as a means. Instead, he said it is wrong to use someone as a mere means, indicating that it is immoral to use someone solely for what they can do for us. Nature bestows each of us with “gifts of nature,” as Kant refers to them. Qualities of temperament range from intelligence, wit, courage, perseverance, or decisiveness. According to Kant, these gifts of nature require “good will…present to correct their influence on the mind…” In other words, those with an immoral character could abuse these gifts of nature for wrongdoing. Kant emphasizes the importance of possessing a good will; a good will is “good in itself” according to Kant, regardless of what it does or does not …show more content…
One of these three higher pleasures described by Mill is acts which engage one’s moral sentiments. Thus, Mill claims that participating in activities appealing to one’s values — like compassion — open the gate to genuine happiness. Kant draws a similar conclusion, saying that we must put the needs and desires of others before our own in order for society as a whole to achieve optimum levels of