Preview

Cause Of Rome's Second Punic War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
367 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cause Of Rome's Second Punic War
The Second Punic War began in 218 B.C. and lasted until a peace treaty was signed between Rome and Carthage in 201 B.C. (Morey, 1901). In Rome’s attempts to try and restrain Carthage’s expansion in western Europe they lost tens of thousands of troops to Carthage’s commander, Hannibal, as he marched from Spain into Italy and then across the Roman territories. This appeared to be the course of the fate of Rome until Hannibal’s reinforcements were kept from reaching him and he was drawn out of Italy by the Roman consul Scipio and his ally Masinissa, a disputed king Numidia, together taking forces into Africa (Morey, 1901, para. 19-20). This culminated in a decisive battle in Zama in 202 B.C. that lead to the treaty between Rome and Carthage.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hannibal resumed his siege of Saguntum and conquered it after a terrible and costly siege. Hannibal, although he held preeminence in Carthage, still had to rely on his allies to keep him in power. A delegate was sent to Rome to answer a question regarding whether Hannibal had acted on his own or had the approval of the Carthaginian senate. The delegate, according to Livy, was the best orator in Carthage. He quickly quashed the argument regarding the border of Hasdrubal because the Carthaginian council had not been part of the talks. Furthermore, he argued that the Romans had broken the treaty after the First War by invading Sardinia; finally, he stated that Hannibal broke no treaty because the Saguntines did not have an alliance with Rome when the treaty between Hasdrubal formed. However, the Romans did not care about that, they wanted peace or war. The Carthaginians declared the Romans needed to choose, and the Romans chose the later. At this critical juncture, Carthage still held with Hannibal and wanted to help him.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    From a snapshot of the Second Punic War, the Carthaginians defeated the Romans while under the consul of Gaius Flaminius. The battle is considered one of the largest and most successful ambushes in military history. The battle consisted of around 50,000 Carthaginian soldiers versus about 30,000 Roman soldiers. The aftermath of the battle produced well over 15,000+ lost soldiers for the Roman army while Hannibal only lost approximately 2,500 of his own. Despite the overview of the battle, much more can be examined when looking at the events leading up to the brilliant ambush set by…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Punic Wars were three conflicts between Carthage and Rome. The first conflict was from 264-241 B.C. It grew out of an altercation between Messana and Syracuse. The Messanians asked Carthage for help and Syracuse asked Rome for help. The Strait of Messana, which separated the Italian Peninsula from Sicily, was important strategically, and both Carthage and Rome responded. The Punic army (Carthaginians) arrived in Sicily and mediated peace between the two and established a military base. When the Roman army arrived, they drove off the Punic army from the military base and war ensued (Columbia…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Battle tactics are said to have changed over time. However, just the opposite is evident. Battle tactics are for anyone to use, but work best with military’s that are stable and continually training. In many cases, militaries throughout the world can be seen using the same tactics today as used in the 2nd Punic War particularly The Battle of Cannae. What make tactics improve so well is the repetition of both practicing in training and executing tactics on the battlefield. Battle tactics improved with the establishment of a professional military because, most soldiers who were now veterans could move up in ranks and understand how they were previously defeated in different battles.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    By 246 BCE, the Carthaginians controlled the trade routes and maritime trade in the Mediterranean. The Rome Republic was founded in 509 BCE as a result of an overthrow of Tarquinius Superbus, King of Rome. By 246 BCE, Rome, a small city, was unable to trade in the Mediterranean, only the Tiber River, but it dominated the Italian Peninsula, and only had access to the Italian Peninsula. However, Rome was growing stronger. The Punic Wars were fought to determine who controlled the trade in the…

    • 4407 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal’s overall war strategy in Italy, or lack thereof, can be seen as a strong contributing factor to Carthage’s ultimate defeat in the Second Punic War. Livy describes, “Hannibal…without orders from the senate, crossed both the Alps and the Ebro.” Demonstrating his defiance of Carthaginian Government’s ambitions against Rome. Ultimately, Hannibal sought not to destroy Rome but to “create a balance of power with [her]” according to Fronda. This is to suggest that rather than conquer Rome, Hannibal wanted to be on the same playing field in order to deny them the opportunity to claim hegemony over the Mediterranean. The content of the Macedonian–Carthaginian Treaty further evidences Hannibal’s lack of intention to destroy Rome as, in multiple sections, it discusses how Rome will be treated and acknowledges their…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome rule its people in a very organize and civil manner, which draws loyalty among its citizens. Rome has an effective and distinct way in managing people, particularly to the inhabitants of their newly acquired lands and territories. One of the best example was the Latins in Latium, whose devotion and loyalty were exceedingly commendable, especially during the Second Punic War, where they fought valiantly--along with the Romans --against the forces of Hannibal. On other hand, Carthage "great advantage" was they have a "permanent able leader," that command its military forces. Unlike Rome, the order of its military resides in the hands of its civil magistrates, who were constantly replaced…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scipio Africanus Outline

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This act caused Hannibal to leave Italy and return to Africa to fight Scipio. In 202 BC…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Critical THinking

    • 958 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the Punic Wars, Rome made an effort to take over Italy(most importantly Sicily). Although they had a land power advantage, they realized they could not win without a navy. The Roman navy eventually defeated the Carthaginian navy, and won the first Punic War. Sicily became the first Roman province as a result. Eventually, Carthage retaliated, and with the help of general Hannibal, almost retook all of Rome's provinces. However, Rome fought back and won the Second Punic War. After the Battle of Zama(202 B.C.E), Carthage signed a peace treaty and lost Spain. Fifty years later, the third and final Punic War defeated Carthage once and for all (which was advocated by the politician Cato). This marked the beginning of the great Roman Republic and Empire.…

    • 958 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Republican period of Roman history began in 509 BCE after the last Etruscan kings was dropped. The Republic was controlled by the Senate, which was an assembly by dominated upper-class families. This dominance by the aristocracy led to tensions between the social classes, especially among the lower classes who fought for equality in both the economy and the government. Despite these inner struggles, Rome's military power strengthened throughout the 5th and 4th centuries BCE and by 270 BCE they commanded the entire peninsula. 264 BCE brought the beginning of the three Punic Wars fought against Carthage over control of the western Mediterranean. These resulted in victories for Rome which granted them access to the wealth of Greece, Egypt,…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Punic War was a major turning point for Rome and its continued overseas expansion. The Romans drove the Carthaginians out of Spain, and then attacked Carthage itself. The Romans, led by Scipio Africanus, defeated the Carthaginians,…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He defeated the Carthaginians led by the legendary general, Hannibal at the northern city of Zama in Africa. By doing so, he ended the nearly 20 year old war. In this battle, the Romans were numerically deficient in infantry but where outnumbered in cavalry. After an extended skirmish between Rome and the Carthaginians, the light infantry and the mix of light infantry and war elephants deployed by Hannibal, and cause the man formations of the 2 sides to meet. Hannibal sends his army in echelon formation to envelop the roman flanks but ends up loosing the battle. The Battle of Zama was the last and decisive victory to the second Punic war. Zama was one of the three wars between Carthage and Rome and resulted in the destruction of Carthage and is annexed by Rome. A modern but similar battle to Zama was the Battle of Waterloo. Napoleon, another legendary general, led the French to battle against the English and their allies. Although Napoleon had a great reputation, Wellington, the general of the European side, proved to have more intelligence when he outsmarts Napoleon's plan and defeats the French. Both battles saw the final defeat of a famed and "invincible" military leader, Hannibal at Zama and Napoleon at Waterloo. Also, both battles were decisive battles in that they ultimately end the great wars. The Battle of Zama ended the 2nd Punic war and the Battle of Waterloo ended the Napoleonic wars. All in…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scipio got his reputation as a great general through defeating the Carthaginian general Hannibal. In 210 B.C. When Rome decided to send reinforcements to the battlefield in Spain there was no senior general willing to head down there, so Scipio volunteered to lead the fight against Carthage.In 211 B.C., Scipio was put in charge of Rome's forces in Spain, Two years later, he took the city of Carthago Nova. In 208 B.C. At the Battle of Baecula Scipio defeated Hasdrubal (Hannibal's brother), who fled to Italy with some of his troops. Scipio defeated the rest of the Carthaginian forces in Spain retaking it for Rome in 206 B.C. He next planned to take his forces to Africa after being elected consul in 205 B.C. but ran into some opposition from the Roman government. He then traveled to North Africa with as many troops as he could muster to fight Hannibal. Hannibal’s government then called him back to protect carthage. Scipio and Hannibal finally faced each other in the Battle of Zama In 202 bc, during the battle the Roman soldiers sounded horns which frightened the carthaginian elephants causing them to…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Punic Wars

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    gave them the advantage in the first war, although they suffered a large loss at the battle…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 3rd Punic War

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A big turning point was the 3rd Punic War and the End of Carthage. In 509 BC Carthage and Rome signed a friendship treaty. But this friendship would not last forever. There was series of wars fought between Carthage and Rome known as the Punic Wars. Fought between 264-146 BC. Carthage was a city-state on the Greek model that had been founded by Phoenicians. It was the strongest city in the Western Mediterranean by the 3rd century and it became very wealth through trade. Carthaginian merchants went from one end of the Mediterranean to the other, the city's fleets were huge, and its army was one of the best in the ancient world. It was Carthage that pried loose the Greek hold on the western ports, and Carthaginian merchants traded as far north as England and down the West African coast. Unlike Rome, but like the Greeks, the Carthaginians also made extensive use of mercenaries. By the early 200s, Carthage had expanded across North Africa but also had control of the Belearic Islands, Sardinia, Corsica, and much of Sicily. She took the goods from these regions, and her own fertile hinterland, and shipped them to eastern ports. Once Rome had conquered most of Italy, it was only a matter of time before these two ambitious and powerful empires came face to face with one another. Rome was a civilization that grew out of a small agricultural community founded on the Italian Peninsula. As years past Rome began to expand its empire all through out the peninsula. Later on they conquer most of the Italian peninsula. The Romans were very skilled fighters. Their army was fierce. They were stronger on land than on water. They wanted to expand their empire…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays