Preview

Causes of 2003 Us Iraq War

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3867 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Causes of 2003 Us Iraq War
Liberalism and Hegemonic Stability Theory
As Causes for the 2003 US-Iraq War Many factors went into the decision of United States leaders to enter into war with Iraq in 2003. These reasons can be related to various classical and modern theories on the causes of war between states. Though there are several stances and viewpoints on the righteousness or legality of the war on Iraq, an objective eye will notice that the real factors for going to war are neither grounded in righteousness nor law. They involve the maintenance of peace and power for those in control, in this case, the United States. The theories of Liberalism and Hegemonic Stability Theory both sufficiently account for the United States' main motivations for entering war with Iraq. Liberalism will account for the motivation of preserving the world peace while Hegemonic Stability Theory will account for the influence of world power on the United States' decision to go to war. Coupled with a case study on the US-Iraq war, these theories will help to better understand the reasoning behind the war. I will begin with a description of the two theories I have chosen, Liberalism and Hegemonic Stability Theory. I will then briefly explain some of the real life events and decisions that went into the decision to go to war. Following, I will tie the case study to the two theories and give examples as to where they overlap. I will finish by explaining how I feel these two theories adequately explain the causes for the US-Iraq war.
Background on Liberalism and Hegemonic Stability Theory Liberalism is based heavily on Immanuel Kant's writings on perpetual peace. Kant's theory does not outwardly explain the causes for war, but the climate for peace among liberal nations. One must look to the reasons for peace in order to determine the causes for war. Kant describes three conditions that are needed for perpetual peace, the first being that the citizens of a state will begin to demand economic and judicial


Cited: Bush, George W. 2002. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America [online]. Washington DC: The White House. [cited 2 May 2005]. Available from the World Wide Web: [http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html] Doyle, Michael W. 1986. Liberalism and World Politics. Conflict After the Cold War. Edited By Richard K. Betts. 2005. New York: Pearson-Longman. pp291-306. Feaver, Peter D., 2002. Don 't Substitute Spy Services for Leadership. American Diplomacy vol. 8 no. 2 2002: 1-3. Gilpin, Robert. 1981. Hegemonic War and International Change. Conflict After the Cold War. Edited By Richard K. Betts. 2005. New York: Pearson-Longman. pp93-104. Kant, Immanuel. 1964. Perpetual Peace. Conflict After the Cold War. Edited By Richard K. Betts. 2005. New York: Pearson-Longman. pp121-127. Keohane, Robert, and Joseph S. Nye. 1989. Power and Interdependence. Conflict After the Cold War. Edited By Richard K. Betts. 2005. New York: Pearson-Longman. pp139-145. McCartney, Paul T., 2004. American Nationalism and U.S. Foreign Policy from September 11 to the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly vol. 119 no. 3 2004: 399-423.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Canada's Complicity & U.S Aggression in the Vietnam War
    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Canada's Complicity & U.S Aggression in the Vietnam War

    After the end of the Second World War, the world was left with two superpowers with competing ideologies: The United States of America and the Soviet Union. The Americans had come out of the war with a surging economy and served as the flagship for the capitalist nations of the West. The Soviets on the other hand practiced Communism, an ideology that was seen as a great threat to the Western way of life. 1 Though they had been allied at the end of the war, both nations quickly moved to bolster their military and economic infrastructure to prepare for the era of pseudo-colonialism and competition between the two powers they both knew would follow. By 1949, the Soviets would become the world’s second nuclear power, launching most of the world into a full out cold war between the communist East and the capitalist West. Competition between these ideologies meant that each side would fight to protect their influence in foreign nations, to spread their ideologies to new nations, and to protect against the spread of their enemy’s ideology to new nations; a policy the West…

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annontated Bibliography Bay of Pigs
    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Annontated Bibliography Bay of Pigs

    Cogan, C. G. (1993). Covert action and congressional oversight: A deontology. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 16(2), 87-98. http://www.tandfonline.com…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis of President George Bush's Letter to Saddam Hussein
    • 1067 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis of President George Bush's Letter to Saddam Hussein

    President George Bush’s letter to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein is, at least on the surface, a persuasive piece intended to convince the Iraqi leader to withdraw his forces from occupied Kuwait before war breaks out. Upon closer reading, however, the critical reader will see that Bush’s "argument" is, in fact, not much of a rational argument (let alone a convincing one), which is odd in that Bush himself repeatedly points out that much is at stake. The superficiality of the American President’s argument leads one to seek out other more likely purposes.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Foreign Policy
    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    9/11 Foreign Policy

    It is common today that the United States foreign policy has been inspiring to a lot of nations worldwide. It is argued by a lot of political scholars that the 9/11 terrorist attack actually shaped the United States foreign policy. Even though it is debatable to if the 9/11 attack did shape the United States foreign policy and how it did that can be discovered at the end of this essay. This will be proven by analysing a theoretical view of terrorism and a little background of what happened in September 11, 2001 and the United States foreign policy before the 9/11 attack followed by policies like the Bush doctrine, Obama doctrine and also looking at their criticisms.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Billie
    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Billie

    Dodge, Toby, (2010), “The Ideological Roots of Failure: The Application of Kinetic Neo-Liberalism to Iraq.”…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Reasons For America's Invasion Of Iraq Dbq
    • 2121 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Reasons For America's Invasion Of Iraq Dbq

    President Bush’s justification towards the invasion on Iraq in 2004 explicated that the main reason to invade Iraq was security measures. Bush was terrified for the citizens of his country and the rest of the world, as he thought Iraq was in control of nuclear weapons that could harm everyone. However, this was not a true reflection of America’s ambitions in Iraq. This essay will prove that America’s intentions into Iraq was largely the fact that Iraq was a major oil source for the world and if America could dominate this source they could have more authority than any other country. Bush’s administration also misstated information regarding Iraq’s possessions of any Weapons of Mass Destruction, and their links with Al Qaeda for this purpose.…

    • 2121 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Should George Bush the Senior Have Ousted Saddam from Power?
    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Should George Bush the Senior Have Ousted Saddam from Power?

    Saddam Hussein was the president of Iraq until he was ousted by the United States government. During his rule, Saddam was criticized because of his method of ruling. In addition, Saddam was accused of exerting atrocities against the people of Iraq. This was evidenced by the mass killings carried out by his administration. Saddam Hussein and his administration were considered to be a security threat to the people of the United States. These insecurity issues were caused by Saddam’s involvement in biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons agenda. These weapons could lead to massive loss of lives if used against a nation like the United States. Moreover, some people thought that the United States ought to have made a humanitarian intervention to rescue the citizens of Iraq subjected to the harsh rule of Saddam Hussein. For these reasons, some people believed that Saddam should have been ousted by George Bush the senior. On the other hand, the opponents of this idea argue that the United States was interested in Iraq because of the rich oil deposits found in it. The opponents believe that, the United States only wanted to achieve selfish gains. This paper presents the reasons George Bush the senior should have overthrown Saddam Hussein during his reign.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Analysis of America's Current Wars
    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Analysis of America's Current Wars

    In the last decade, America has engaged in war in two middle-eastern countries. These countries are Afghanistan and Iraq. America has waged war against these countries for common reasons, but each war also had its unique cause for war. America had a just cause in its war in Afghanistan, but its participation in the war in Iraq is debated. Two presidents who had to lead and deal with these wars were President George Washington Bush who was in office from 2000 to 2008, and current President Barack Obama who came into office 2008 and is currently in office. Two administrations created by the following Presidents were the Bush administration and the Obama administration created by President George W. Bush and Barack Obama respectively. The legitimacy of these wars in these respective countries is on the minds of many Americans today.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Cold War, Current Events, and U.S. Diplomacy
    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Cold War, Current Events, and U.S. Diplomacy

    References: Gale, T. (2003). Chapters: 1 - 4. In The Cold War (pp. 1-271). Farmington, MI 48331: Greenhaven Press.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    International Relations
    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    International Relations

    Buzan, B. 1997. Rethinking Security after the Cold War. Cooperation and Conflict. Vol. 32, No. 1: 5-28.…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Story Symbols and their meanings
    • 918 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Story Symbols and their meanings

    “Cold War.” UXL Encyclopedia of U.S. History. Sonia Benson, Daniel E. Brannen, Jr., and Rebecca Valentine. Vol. 2. Detroit: UXI., 2009. 344-349. Student Resources in Context. Web. 16 Jan. 2014.…

    • 918 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Cause Of The Iraq War
    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did The Cause Of The Iraq War

    The Second Persian Gulf War, or better known as the Iraq War is an ideal event to spark curiosity. There are two main factors that contributed to the Iraq War. They are the causes of the Iraq War, and the most dominant groups of people in Iraq, which are the Sunni and Shiite Arabs. Then there is the outcome and aftermath of the Iraq War. These two factors changed how society thinks about foreign wars.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cold War
    • 4652 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Cold War

    For Americans and many in the world, the Cold War dominated international relations from 1945-1991. Only the nuclear balance of terror prevented this uneasy peace from becoming all out war, and few if any events could be understood outside of the context of this bipolar rivalry. As the Cold War came to an end, some thought we had witnessed "an end to history."(1) Instead, we have witnessed a fundamental change in the logic of world politics. The United States has had difficulty developing a clear and coherent foreign policy in this new era. The New World Order of President Bush and the strategy of engagement and enlargement of President Clinton seem vague and ambiguous when compared to the clarity and simplicity of the American policy of containment during the Cold War. While this policy of containment rapidly gained a consensus both among the American foreign policy elite as well as the mass public after World War Il, it did represent a fundamental shift of relations with the Soviet Union from one of wartime cooperation. Explaining the origins of the Cold War has been one of the most common and contested topics in the study of American diplomatic history, and the end of the Cold War has changed how historians examine and interpret this period. Increasingly, scholars have gained access to documents, especially on the Soviet side, that have allowed them to go beyond past conjecture and utilize archival evidence. The end of the Cold War has removed much of the passion that surrounded writing Cold War history while scholars and states were still living it. This increased detachment has allowed historians to move from placing blame to recognizing the ideological conflict that was at the center of the Cold War's origins.…

    • 4652 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Inhumane Anthropology
    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Inhumane Anthropology

    The Bush administration had sent US troops to Iraq because there was a belief that the country had been developing weapons of mass destruction and were an aid to Al-Qaeda. Furthermore, a portion of America had supported this possible war as “44 percent of Americans reported [in a poll] that either ‘most or ‘some of the Sept.11 hijackers were Iraqi citizens. The answer is zero”( The Christian Science Monitor, March 14,2003). Moreover, America wanting to hurt Iraq was seen as a victim mentality act by others. On claimed that “We [Americans] do those who lost their lives no service at all by adopting a victim mentality”(An attack on Us All: NATO’s Response to Terrorism). This indicates that America had dwelled so much in this tragedy that their grievance became anger and that led into violence. Instead America should not thier anger interfere but rather “think about a rational response that brings real peace and justice to [the] world” (Zinn & Arnove, eds. (2009). Voices of a People’s History, 2nd edition (NY: Seven Stories Press), p. 603.). America invading Iraq was seen injustice since their involvement in the 9/11 attack was more of an assumption then factual…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethnic Conflict In Iraq
    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethnic Conflict In Iraq

    Upon marching into Iraq in 2003, American forces were tasked with deposing Saddam Hussein and imposing stability and security. The former was accomplished with stunning rapidity; the latter continues to elude Iraqis, regional interests, and the Western world almost fifteen years later. Why such chaos? Even the American “surge” of soldiers in 2007 did little to quell the violence. Ethnic conflict between the Kurds, Sunnis, and Shias, extant prior to American involvement, intensified post-invasion.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics