Preview

Chapter Summary- Origins of Organized Diplomacy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
780 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chapter Summary- Origins of Organized Diplomacy
Chapter Summary- Origins of Organized Diplomacy

This chapter gives us short overview of history of diplomacy, how it developed, what was at the core beginning and what influenced it most.
Firstly there were assumptions that foundations of foreign policy were based on changeless national and imperial characteristics, that it is special and beyond understanding of ordinary man, so everyone tried to leave it to those elects in the Cabinet and trust them ‘blindly’. Implicitly it was believed that those Governments would works its best to maintain peace (greatest national interest), but 1914- 1918 war proved them wrong, so these ordinary citizens had to take responsibility for consequences of promises and decisions made on behalf of them plus to deal with created hostilities. After these events, voters decided not to put much trust into those elected in cabinets, but more to work on developing a system of information.
The problem arises when public started mixing terms, such as ‘foreign policy’, ‘negotiation’, ‘executive’, and/ or ‘legislative’ and their usage. In domestic affairs everything was pretty much clear, but problem was foreign policy due to wrong understanding and usage of word ‘diplomacy’, whose history is explained below.
Word ‘diplomacy’ were used to explain few very much different things, so we will try to give short overview of historical usage of it to show that it is not outdated nor invented recently and to show how and when it should be used.
Oxford English Dictionary says: ‘Diplomacy is a management of international relations; the method by which these relations are adjusted and managed by ambassadors and envoys; the business or art of diplomatist.’ (Harold Nicolson, Diplomacy)
If we take a look at human history, we will be able to see that diplomacy was actually older than it and that it started with angels as first diplomats between heaven and earth. Later on savages needed to communicate between each other’s tribes, at least to agree

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A2 History Coursework

    • 1584 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, asses the view that international diplomacy failed to achieve stability in Europe from 1919 to 1930.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roosevelt and Isolationism

    • 5742 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Schulzinger, Robert D. American Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.…

    • 5742 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political contacts and interaction were most often made because a country wanted to become allies to gain military security, or to join their forces to fight a mutual enemy that they couldn’t fight alone; but sometimes situations didn't go the way they were planned.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term “diplomacy” is ordinarily and frequently used in reference to foreign policies or external affairs attended by government officials who are assigned to debate and negotiate on matters of importance such as bilateral or multilateral interests, in order to successfully come into terms, arrange and work out a deal solving all issues/problems.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Foreign relations refers to the ongoing management of relationships between a public policy administrative organization of a state and other entities external to its authority or influence. Congress has the power to declare war. The potus-president makes treaties with other countries. The senate approves treaties with other countries. Potus and congress control trade with other countries.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilson introduced the term “moral diplomacy” to the West which attempted to spread influence and control foreign nations by using economic power. This didn’t always work as planned especially when things got tough and “moral diplomacy” alone wasn’t enough to fight off problems.…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Princeton University (2006) defines diplomatic negotiations as between nations. The lesson learned by the Americans was the need to communicate with their enemy. Our military leaders and president, Lyndon Johnson, used bombing as “verbal” negotiations with Vietnam. Neither the Americans nor the Vietnamese were willing to compromise and enter into discussions. This refusal to enter into talks led to millions of deaths. The Vietnam War could have been avoided entirely or ended much sooner had the negotiations taken place.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vietnam War

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this paper it will explore lessons learned when dealing with diplomatic negotiations, presidential leadership, and cultural/social contexts. During the Vietnam War the United States did not realize the high level of intelligence that the Vietnamese people had and how much their culture and nationalism meant to them. They did not want the United States interfering with their country but some of the leaders in charge felt that the United States could help since they were offering monies and military advisors in regard to the conflicts between North and South Vietnam.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Appeasement in the 1930s

    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Woodard, Garry. The diplomacy of appeasement [online]. Quadrant (Sydney), v.43, nos 1-2, Jan-Feb 1999: 48-53. Availability: <http://search.informit.com.au.wwwproxy0.nun.unsw.edu.au/fullText;dn=990606442;res=APAFT> ISSN: 0033-5002. [cited 11 Apr 08].…

    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear weapons have only ever been used once in human history, and that was during World War II when The United States deployed missiles on Japanese territory, in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. At the time of bombing in 1945 only the USA had developed nuclear weapons, whilst today the pool of states consisting of nuclear weapons is still extremely small, with only nine states laying claim to nuclear technology and weaponry. This nuclear proliferation is explained by Darryl Howlett who explains this as the worldwide spread of nuclear weapons. For Howlett states are nuclear driven because of the ‘strategic, political and prestige benefits’ attached to nuclear weapons[1]. In the modern world the mass media are often critical about nuclear weapons and the threats they pose for society, but this begs the question; why have nuclear weapons not been used in conflict since 1945? To answer this question the issues of taboo and deterrence and the arrival of virtual nuclear arsenals must be called into question, as well as theoretical ideas such as rationality from proliferation optimists and proliferation pessimists. I will also look at whether we currently live in a non-proliferation regime, and look at the alternatives for peace and nuclear non-usage.…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    1979, p. 367), are given a prominent place among the range of coercive diplomacy (George,…

    • 3083 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2015 Spring Syllabus

    • 1478 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The power to hurt is bargaining power. To exploit it is diplomacy--vicious diplomacy, but diplomacy. T.C. Schelling, academician, Nobel Prize winner…

    • 1478 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question as to the relevancy of Track II Diplomacy can be answered by examining its rationale. Track II Diplomacy is resorted to for several reasons; four of which are examined in this essay. It is resorted to when official communication between conflicting parties is ‘tense or non-existent’ (ibid.). A case in point is the Georgian-South Ossetian conflict which saw no official dialogue between the two parties (Leguey-Feilleux 2009). However, through the use of Track II, an official Georgian-Ossetian negotiation process was established (ibid.).…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nowadays, as the society we live in gets more and more complicated, human interactions seem to have set off to a whole new level. Suddenly, diplomacy has taken the world by storm, thus becoming a must in every successful action of our day-to-day life. Nevertheless, since words may sometimes be misleading, it is our actions that end up betraying our true nature.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The DNA of diplomacy starts to change during the cold war era in which states did not fight through the armies any longer but instead the spread of the ideology to other states. In 21st century, the diplomacy is no longer talking about war but instead it is today focus on the cooperation among the states and international trade.…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays