Preview

Characteristics Of Alexander Hamilton

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1097 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Characteristics Of Alexander Hamilton
Throughout this year, many great leaders have been taught, but there were three men who stood out most, for good and for bad. One was Alexander Hamilton, a well known congressmen who displays many great traits, but also had a few times when he wasn’t his best self. Another leader was Andrew Jackson and as he started in poverty, he worked his way up to becoming the president. The people of his time thought he was a superior leader, but he had moments when he could have been more empathetic. The last leader was Henry Clay, a man who was known for bringing people together and keep trying to work his way to the top. He also had a few times when he could have been more right-minded. These men were extremely successful, and their stories are worthy …show more content…
George Washington knew who Hamilton was because he was a good leader, and he was respectful. Because Hamilton was a good leader, he knew how to bring people together and he knew how to work with a team of people. During the Battle of Valley Forge in 1777, Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben, the leader of the U.S., needed his plans translated to English and French (French were our allies). Von Steuben only knew German, so he needed the German to be translated to French because he needed the French to get the plans. After he had him change the plans to German, they needed to be changed to English, so the rest of the leaders of the Americans could read it. Hamilton knew French, so he was able to translate from French to English. This shows that since Hamilton spoke more than one language, he could work with a lot of people that others couldn’t. Being able to speak many languages can make you good at working with a team, and Hamilton displayed this very well during the Battle of Valley …show more content…
In 1804, Aaron Burr, a politician, ran for Governor of New York because he wanted to be powerful. Both Hamilton and Burr were residents of New York, and Hamilton told reporters that Burr is dangerous. Burr lost the election and blamed it on Hamilton because he said that he was perilous. Saying mean things about an opponent is normal now, but back then that really could have costed them the election. The ethical thing to have done would be to not say anything about him or to say something nice. Saying Burr is dangerous to a reporter made Burr furious, so he challenged Hamilton to a duel. The duel is fought in 1804 in Weehawken, New Jersey. Burr tells everyone that he is going to fire into the air, the ethical thing to do; however, he says he’s going to shoot Hamilton in the abdomen. They both did as they say they said. In this duel, Hamilton is making the right-minded action. Hamilton gets shot in the abdomen and dies. This all happened because he said something mean about Aaron Burr.
Not only did Hamilton say something degrading about Burr, but he made an unethical choice while in office. He was the Secretary of the Treasury, and he was exposing cabinet secrets to Major George Beckwith. Beckwith was also a part of Benedict Arnold trying to sell West Point to the British. This is known as treason. Hamilton was not the most ethical man, but he was great at working

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamilton grasped the test and chance to make…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For example, as the first Secretary of Treasury, Hamilton was essentially the founder of the U.S. financial system, which he is most known for. He had exceptional ideas about international trade and how the economy should work that were very impressive for his time. Many of these, such as a national bank as well as payment through taxes and bonds ultimately led him to take the lead in funding the nation’s debt,…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton wanted the country to be mercantile which means that he believed that we should be deeply involved in world trade. He wanted the US to be a manufacturing powerhouse. He even invested in a plan to make Patterson New Jersey a manufacturing hub which ultimately failed.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamiltonian, Lieutenant- colonel, First U.S. Secretary of the Treasury and Secretary of State and spent his time devoted to the rich and wealthy individuals of Virginia. Though I have little knowledge on today’s congress, senate, and military. What I do remember is that what we have in common with Hamilton is,” Strong central government, order and organization, Industrial development, Helped establish a financial credit for the U.S. government. Hamilton had a firm belief that the rich, powerful and well educated should have the control on the government. Which in all honesty looking at today modern times, I can fully agree that the much upper class controlling the government, why? To be blunt money talks in future and I’m sure during 1780s and 90s it did as well, the rich and well educated people would rather spend his or her tax money on what they believe is right each upper class individual have a grasp on politics. Hamilton’s strong belief is still going strong today and being applied through the Senate Congress…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Originally, Hamilton met Lafayette in New York along with Aaron Burr, John Laurens, and Hercules Mulligan. The five of them discussed the revolution and advocated for it. When it came time for the war, Hamilton was asked by George Washington to be his aide-de-camp. Washington needed help training the common men that he was using for the military at the time. Hamilton’s connection to Lafayette, a famed general in France, led him to securing Lafayette as a commander and trainer of men in the army.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burr, Hamilton, and Jefferson, a character Analysis. Closely follows the lives of three of the United States greatest politicians as they struggle to create and maintain a new nation. In the appendix of the book the author, Roger Kennedy, explains how he shows sympathy for historical losers and often doubts some triumphs of winners in history books. So in this book, it's obvious Mr. Kennedy shows a bias to Aaron Burr, a lesser-known founder. One such example of this is throughout the book Roger belittles Hamilton and Jefferson to try and show how Burr was more honest and credible then the history books show him to be.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the number one fan of the musical “Hamilton”, I was immediately drawn to Washington & Hamilton: The Alliance That Forged America by Stephen F Knott and Tony Williams. I have always been interested in the relationship between George Washington and Alexander Hamilton, but have heard little about it prior to this book. I was really pulled into this book when I read the second paragraph of the introduction, “But one of the more important founding collaborations has been overlooked by readers: the unlikely partnership of George Washington and Alexander Hamilton” (pg XI). This sentence leads to the main point, which examines the odd yet critical alliance between Washington and Hamilton.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamilton’s death happened on July 11, 1804. Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr were political rivals and personal enemies. They decided to settle their differences with a duel. In 1804, Hamilton and Burr had a duel, however dueling was outlawed at that time. Hamilton and Burr fired their pistols at each other. Hamilton may have purposefully missed because his son died in a duel and he hesitated. Burr was arrested that day and charged with murder. The charges were later dropped.…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He fought along side with General George Washington in Long Island New York, and led a successful raid for British cannon in the Battery. General Washington was impressed with Hamilton’s intelligence, and promoted Hamilton to Lieutenant Colonel as well as his personal secretary at Washington’s aide-de-camp. Hamilton eventually became one of Washington’s most trusted advisers (The Famous People, “Alexander Hamilton”).…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When he was about 16 years old in 1773, he had finally arrived in New York, where he had enrolled in King’s College, which is now known as Columbia University. Hamilton had his mindset more on political involvement than academics. In 1774, at the age of seventeen, Hamilton published essays in support of American independence. In school, he felt that since he was a quick learner, and that he was not being challenged enough academically, so he left King’s College before graduating to become part of the military to join forces with the…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason why I support Hamilton is because of his views on the structure of government. Hamilton favored a strong national or central government in which Jefferson opposed, but I believe that a strong central government would benefit the people of the community and country. A loose interpretation of the government was one of Hamilton’s beliefs and that means he was flexible and believe some things needed to be change or tweaked a bit. That gives freedom for the country. Hamilton was very smart, smarter than Jefferson, though some of his views were not…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The assassination of Alexander Hamilton was unjust because he fought for the rights of people such as voting rights… (Specific people)... although many people believed that he had a thing against freedman because he was a slave owner himself. After being in jail trying to convince people that freedman should not have full citizenship rights such as said in “on Reconstruction” (Groff 1). This was a thing that was like a review on Alexander hamilton talking about the things that he did from the early ages to horrible sudden death. As said in the text “ If, on the other hand, freedman were given full citizenship rights, including voting rights, it would bolster the amount of votes for republicans, which were the people who drove the reconstruction era.” this would mean as later on in life the 14th amendment was finally ratified and acknowledged by the people that slavery is no more and later came the 15th amendment, which was the right to vote for different races, that would , mean that the rights of freedmen were finally declared. Although that many people did not…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aaron Burr’s image was greatly distorted after his assassination of Alexander Hamilton. This labeled as a murder to the public eye. The way a leader is perceived can either create or break their public life. Since Hamilton was very well known and beloved to the early Americans, it caused an uproar the entire nation. Therefore, with this enormous blow to his career, it was no longer seen as a leader that could be trusted. In the matter of leading, trust is the simple yet crucial building block to becoming an just and influential…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Aaron Burr a Bad Guy?

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton is portrayed as a martyr while Aaron Burr is seen as a villain for killing him. While Hamilton did write that he was not planning on shooting at Burr the first time, there are still some suspicions as to whether he truly felt that way, such as the fact that he put on his glasses to see his target better. Also, the immediate reaction of the public was entirely in favor of Hamilton and ruined Aaron Burr’s political career. The rumors that circulated tainted Burr’s name for generations to come, without any factual evidence to support it. The media was to blame for Burr’s bad reputation, not Burr himself. In fact, immediately after the duel, it was reported that Burr felt guilty about having won and even requested to speak to the wounded Hamilton. If Burr was truly a “bad guy,” he could not have cared less about the wellbeing of his opponent.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dul

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Honor mattered because character mattered. And character mattered because the fate of the American experiment with republican government still required virtuous leader to survive. Eventually, the US might develop into a nation of laws and established institutions capable of surviving corrupt or incompetent public officials. But it was not there yet. It still required honorable and virtuous leaders to endure. Both Burr and Hamilton came o the interview because they wished to be regarded as part of such company.” (Page 47) Ellis also views their decades-long "war of words" as a reflection of the fragile state…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays