Preview

Was Aaron Burr a Bad Guy?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
342 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Aaron Burr a Bad Guy?
One of the first chapters in the book Founding Brothers by Joseph Ellis is entitled The Duel. It describes the events surrounding a very controversial event in our nation’s history: the duel between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr which ended in the death of the former. When we look at the facts, we see that Hamilton did not have any malicious intent of killing Burr, making Burr seem like the “bad guy.” However, was Aaron Burr really a bad guy, or has his reputation just been skewed by outlying factors and common misconceptions? Alexander Hamilton is portrayed as a martyr while Aaron Burr is seen as a villain for killing him. While Hamilton did write that he was not planning on shooting at Burr the first time, there are still some suspicions as to whether he truly felt that way, such as the fact that he put on his glasses to see his target better. Also, the immediate reaction of the public was entirely in favor of Hamilton and ruined Aaron Burr’s political career. The rumors that circulated tainted Burr’s name for generations to come, without any factual evidence to support it. The media was to blame for Burr’s bad reputation, not Burr himself. In fact, immediately after the duel, it was reported that Burr felt guilty about having won and even requested to speak to the wounded Hamilton. If Burr was truly a “bad guy,” he could not have cared less about the wellbeing of his opponent.
All in all, the fact that Aaron Burr went down in history as a villain is simply a mistake of the public. He was in the wrong duel at the wrong time, and his reputation became unsalvagable while Hamilton went down in history as a victim and a martyr. When we look at the facts, we find that Burr was not bad at all, just misrepresented.

Tindall, George B., and David E. Shi. America: a Narrative History. 7th ed. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2004.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    20) This duel was probably the most confusing and intricate duels to break down. By that meaning, difficult to come to a conclusion on what started it all. I really like the way Ellis informs the reader on what happened before, during, and after the duel. It shows us that he is one hundred percent unbiased and helps the reader know a little bit of whats going on in the minds of both Alexander Hamilton as well as Aaron Burr. The way Ellis explained how everything happened during the duel, it really made me question why Hamilton didn’t just take the shot when he had to instead of just flaunting off his decorated firearm and what was the motive behind Burr’s fatal shot. Was Burr actually sentimental after he shot Hamilton or was it just a shady attempt to mask his inner hatred towards Hamilton. Besides, he did say “these things must have an end.” (pg.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burrs trial obviously exposes many weaknesses within the legal structure of the United States. Burr committed an obvious act of treason against the United States government by taking it upon himself to seize territory for himself. Chief Justice Marshall found Andrew Burr to be not guilty while the jury is believed to have thought different but Burr was still let off. The legal structure and government cannot work under one mans decisions in a democracy, nor can it survive with others believing…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Duel aka “The Interview”, Aaron Burr challenges Alexander Hamilton to a duel to defend his honor. The details and history surrounding the duel and the long standing political rivalry between Hamilton and Burr are fascinating. Participating in a duel was illegal in New York and gentleman participating in this activity and their accomplices had to be able to deny any actual knowledge of the event. The Duel was referred to as “The Interview” and adhered to…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason I was able to see the impact they had on our country is because John E. Ferling, the author, described the hardships and successes of each person in great detail starting from the very beginning and continuing on all the way to the very end of their lives. John E. Ferling approached this book with a higher opinion of Jefferson, but gained greater appreciation for Hamilton towards the end. I enjoyed learning more about the forming of our nation and the lives of some of our founding fathers. I am inclined to learn more about the characters in the book because the play, ‘Hamilton’ on Broadway is something I’ve wanted to see for a while. I’m interested to see how similar and accurate the play is compared to the book. This author’s writing style is something I enjoyed reading, but I don’t think reading another one of his books is something I’d take part in. My recommendation for this book would be to read it for school and other educational purposes, but only read it for pleasure if you thoroughly enjoy…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Alexander Hamilton (2004), Ron Chernow tackles the errand of depicting America's most questionable Founding Father. The book gives an expansive perspective of the scene of early America, with unique accentuation on Hamilton's accomplishments and his relationship to certain Founders.Before understanding this book, my contemplations concurred with the prevalent picture of Hamilton as a splendid however tyrannical man who was as often as possible required in outrages or in clashes with different Founders. I heard that he pushed government, protectionism, mercantilism, a solid government, and a national bank. I additionally realized that he had something to do with the Constitution and thought of a portion of The Federalist Papers. I realized…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Founding Brothers Summary

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The most famous duel in American history took place between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr July 11, 1804. Ellis tells the most common version of the duel, which states in accordance with the rules of a duel in that time period, Hamilton and Burr shot at one another from about ten paces on the plains of Weehawken, NJ. Hamilton was wounded and died the next day. Burr, who had no wounds, would never recover his political standing after his duel with Burr.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burr, Hamilton, and Jefferson, a character Analysis. Closely follows the lives of three of the United States greatest politicians as they struggle to create and maintain a new nation. In the appendix of the book the author, Roger Kennedy, explains how he shows sympathy for historical losers and often doubts some triumphs of winners in history books. So in this book, it's obvious Mr. Kennedy shows a bias to Aaron Burr, a lesser-known founder. One such example of this is throughout the book Roger belittles Hamilton and Jefferson to try and show how Burr was more honest and credible then the history books show him to be.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On July 11, 1804, what was said to be the most prominent duel occurred. The duel between Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton was remarkable as it corresponded to the young, emergent nation because it illustrated the bloodshed that politicians would go through for their political reputation. Joseph J. Ellis spent an entire chapter discussing this conspicuous event for that very reason. Ellis purposely made this chapter the first chapter because he wished to provide evidence that supports his thesis and also catches the reader's attention.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamilton’s death happened on July 11, 1804. Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr were political rivals and personal enemies. They decided to settle their differences with a duel. In 1804, Hamilton and Burr had a duel, however dueling was outlawed at that time. Hamilton and Burr fired their pistols at each other. Hamilton may have purposefully missed because his son died in a duel and he hesitated. Burr was arrested that day and charged with murder. The charges were later dropped.…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brooks was born in South Carolina in 1819 and went to the South Carolina College in 1839, which is known as the University of South Carolina today. Despite his excellent grades, he faced many difficulties at school, from terrible attendance to his infamous duels. Eventually, he was expelled and never graduated from college (Puleo). He had attended law school and became involved with the Mexican War. In fact, he served as a captain in the Palmetto Regiment, establishing his role within United States history briefly (Gienapp). In 1853, he was elected as a representative in the House of Representatives. Less known was his brother, John Hampden Brooks, who entirely supported Preston Brooks’s decision in beating Charles Sumner. Later, through letters, John expressed his glee and his wholehearted support for his brother. Yet, in reality, the incident faced much more controversy nationwide. On May 22, 1856, Brooks briskly strode into the Senate chamber and began to beat Senator Charles Sumner violently with his cane (“Commentary on 1856”). As a Democrat, his views were mainly for slavery, typical of the time. To his credit, Brooks was known as a very moderate Democrat, one willing to compromise often with the other side and stressed the need for cooperation. Newspapers had attributed characteristics like being “considerate and kind” to Brooks’s character (Puleo). But…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapters 11-16

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By 1800 the Federalist party was split, clearing the way to the presidency for the Democratic-Republicans. Two men ran for the nomination: Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr. Each received an equal number of votes in the electoral college, which mean that the Federalist-dominated House of Representatives were required to choose a president. Jefferson finally won (Albert Gallatin as his treasurer). Hamilton sided with Jefferson because he believed Burr to be an unfit and dangerous man. Burr later on killed Hamilton in a duel.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Two men who have played a major role in shaping our nation. Like most influential men of that time, their ideas did not always flow in the same direction. Although Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton butted heads, they established many of today’s ideals. This essay will describe Jefferson and Hamilton, describe how they shaped the political divide as well as why we credit them with the beginning of the two political parties of today.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton was offended because he thought Burr had insulted his father in law. Burr was not usually publicly critical of others. He rarely expressed negative opinions.This was not normal of him to express his opinions towards Hamilton. Later, In 1800, Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr ran for president. After the election, the votes were counted, Jefferson and Burr had both received 73 electoral votes. The House of Representatives then got to vote to decide on who would be President and who would become Vice President. The house voted over and over many times. Hamilton decided to vote for Thomas Jefferson, only because he was greatly opposed to Burr. After the house voted many times, Thomas Jefferson won on the 36th vote. Aaron Burr became Vice President. Burr was furious that Hamilton publicly claimed that Burr would hurt the country if he became president. Burr was also furious that he lost because he thought Hamilton had influenced the…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was a man of great importance during the time of the American Revolution. He was one of our founding forefathers, and had become the first Secretary of Treasury from 1789 to 1795. After his death on July 12, 1804 from gunshot wounds as a result of a duel against his rival Aaron Burr, he had left a great impact on the state of our government today, because of his different point of views and accomplishments. Hamilton had a depressing childhood, but because he had overcome all of his family issues and became successful, he was considered to be a resilient child, which meant that he was strong and flexible mentally, for anything that would or could have happened in his life. There are people who have led their lives in the same direction as Hamilton, by joining law enforcement and becoming part of the military to represent our country. Alexander Hamilton did not live a long life, but he had many great accomplishments that he is known for today. The following statements will include his childhood, how he had attained his accomplishments, and the modern day version of Him.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I disagree with the book’s conclusion because I feel there would’ve been better ways to end the book than with Adams and Jefferson’s friendship and death. I also agree with the book’s conclusion because we got to delve deeper into the lives of Jefferson and Adams and their friendship together. I find it equally important as it is unimportant, but it’s still interesting to read. The book supported what I have read in history textbooks and does not have information that seems out of place or incorrect. I detected a lot of bias from Ellis, one of the reasons being his thought that George Washington is the sole reason we’re here today, which is shown in the text. He believes that Washington knew what the nation would need, and deliberately leaves out information that doesn’t fit his view of history, such as the fact that the Indians involved in the Trail of Tears would’ve suffered leaving whether they took Washington’s advice or not due to where they lived. Ellis was also very protective of John Adams and tried to blame all his bad decisions on Abigail, circumstances, and Jefferson. He also barely mentions Jefferson’s presidency and believes that Jefferson’s version of history isn’t the right version. I think the book could’ve been improved by Ellis not including some of his bias and not trying to justify one’s actions because of bias. I didn’t enjoy reading this book that much because I’m not into reading historical books in my free time. I wouldn’t recommend this book to others because it has an extreme amount of bias in it and I think they could find better historical books. This book is important to my study of U.S. history because it delves deeper into the lives of the important figures in the American Revolution than our textbooks did, so we had a deeper understanding of who they were as people and political…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays