To explain the rise of the chartist political movement and the public support it received we need to consider the two main contributing factors at the time. Historians like Asa Briggs, W.W. Rostow and Gareth Steadman-Jones take differing views on which was the most important explanation for the dramatic rise in public support for the chartist movement. Briggs agreed with an economic based reason and Steadman-Jones agreed with the radical new policies that Chartism offered being the main reason for the growth in support for the movement. This essay will explore these two views and try to identify which is the most important.…
1. There are split views on the Granger / Populist Movement; some historians believe that they were essential in the West for creating a democratic government that would help the common man achieve a place in society, while other historians believe that it set a horrible precedent for public regulation of private businesses and actually put limits on “laizze-faire”(untouched) democracy. Using the documents A – I pick a side and defend it.…
3. Describe the origins and aims of labor movements and socialist politics in the late nineteenth century.…
The Liberal reforms were very significant in people’s lives. There were many reasons for why the liberals decided to reform Britain and these issues are highlighted in Booth and Rowntrees reports about people living below the poverty line. These reports tell us that if someone lost their job before the reforms they had to rely on their savings, family and friends, and the pawn brokers or depend on the poor laws which were the only sort of social protection they had. The government hardly ever stepped in to help people, the conservative government and member of the House of Lords all believed that if a person was poor that meant they were lazy; these reports discovered that that wasn’t the case and that in fact the majority of the poorest in society were born there. Some shocking statistics had shown that 11% of primary school children were malnourished and in 1900 the height for enlisting was reduced to 5 feet and even 50% who enlisted were in too ill health.…
Being that England was a traditionally more liberal and reform-minded country, it had some of the best success in creating a substantial shift in government policies to become more caring (specifically within Parliament). Those of the London Workingmen’s Association petitioned the English Parliament in 1838 for increased male suffrage (Doc 4) among other electoral reforms. They did, in fact, find success with the passage of the “Great Reform Act,” which was a law that guaranteed male suffrage, a more fair distribution of the electorate, and the requirement that members of Parliament needed to own property. Of course, the chartists of Doc. 4 were very one-sided in their petition and failed to see that the passage of the Charter would practically allow those exact workers to obtain high seats in government. Nevertheless, the reforms did improve the overall livelihood of the British masses enough to allow John Stuart Mill to assert that “the general tendency [of…
In the early years, the campaign to enfranchise women was undoubtedly endorsed by the Liberals. The general election of 1906 resulted in a Liberal landslide and with this victory, the hopes of all those pressing for the enfranchisement of women were raised high. The party’s initial huge majority gave the government the power to enfranchise votes for women. However, the Liberals were apprehensive and no more willing than its Conservative predecessors to support the cause of women’s suffrage because of their fear that property-owning women would vote Conservative. Although many members of the Liberal Party were privately supportive of women’s suffrage including the influential David Lloyd George this was not in concord with the main party line. This essay will argue source 17’s claim that the Liberal Party did not ‘care a straw’ for women’s suffrage.…
Reform of the electoral system finally arrived with the 1832 Reform Act, which increased the proportion of eligible voters in England and Wales to 18 per cent of the adult-male population and 12 per cent in Scotland. Although the working classes had high hopes for the Reform Act, they eventually felt betrayed as despite the new legislation, the poor ultimately remained voiceless in the way their country was run. In the years following the Reform Act, the Chartists would begin to plan their campaign to try to effect real electoral change in Britain.…
The disenfranchised working class took to the streets on the 16 August 1819 to protest over their lack of suffrage in the hard economic times. Historian Robert Poole has gone as far as to say that Peterloo was one of the defining moments of it’s age1. For what came to be known as The Peterloo Massacre became a clear indication of the lack of ways in which the working class and peasantry could voice their political beliefs: They did not have the vote, the protest was violently suppressed- and following The Peterloo Massacre newspapers and other publications were censored or shut down if they were deemed to contain any seditious messages. It seems by looking at the sources that one of the most notable shifts in political voice is the censorship and suppression the government issues with the massacre and following it. However, Peterloo did embody a shift towards universal suffrage and a broader political voice, with women veering into the political spectrum for the first time, taking part in the protests and rallies.…
The statement “Reform movements in the United States sought to expand democratic ideals” is a very valid one, in regards to the years of and between 1825 and 1850. This statement bears great truth, and highlights quite simply the inclusion of egalitarian and suffragist ideologies in many and most reformative movements of this time period.…
In A Fierce Discontent, McGerr bequeaths an astounding historical synopsis of the progressive era including subjects as, social action, urbanization, and social reform. Using the once individualistic middle class as his basis for argumentative purposes, McGerr breaks down the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Class relations play a big part in the paperback, focusing on the working class and the immensely wealthy “upper ten” percent. McGerr’s argument was that the progressive movement created a middle class with aspirations for a better democracy, but their ineffectiveness is the soul explanation on the weakness in the political world in the early twentieth century.…
As Hamilton’s industrialized economy of the 1790’s started to prove itself and more citizens involved themselves with their local politics, the 1820’s and 1830’s shortly became a time for a push in political democracy. In the early years of America, it was difficult to get more men involved in politics since only white men who owned property could vote. But by the 1840’s, most white men could vote. With a large new number of voters, the participation in politics greatly increased. In Jackson’s 1828 election, political parties became the main focus of politics. While some may argue this tore America apart, it gave each American voter a place in politics and urged men to fight for their views. Harriet Martineau, a British author, reported her fascination with the dynamics of this democratic political system witnessing candidates for political positions campaigning and “the people were to be the judges,” (Document 3). As the voices of workers grew louder in politics and the Jacksonian Democrats pushed and shoved to help the common man, equality of economic opportunity grew. When Jackson vetoed bill for the Bank of the United States, many argued it was unconstitutional and increased the wealth gap, but Jackson and his supporters feared a monopoly in the wealthy. The Jacksonian Democrats made many other efforts, like the veto of the bank, to support the working class. George Henry Evans echoed this in “The Working Men’s Declaration of Independence” which focused on the basic right and responsibilities of the working class (Document 1). Jacksonian Democrats fought hard for political democracy and equality of economic opportunity, but the guarding of the common man left women and the minorities behind to…
Throughout the history of civilized society, there have been a multitude of great reform movements bringing the advancement of societal standards and governmental policies to the forefront of attention. These requests, if ignored can lead to mass revolt among the people, as was shown by the French Revolution, the American Revolution, and the Protestant Reformation. All reforms begin with small requests and simple protests, but depending on the actions of those in authority it can either erupt into a conflict or be peacefully and diplomatically resolved furthering all of society.…
Women’s Suffrage started in 1848 and wasn’t considered over until 1920 when they 19th Amendment was passed by Congress; giving women the right to vote. However, there are still many people today that would disagree since in many cases women still aren’t equal to men. This paper will cover five aspects of Women Suffrage: the women of the movement, their views, the fight, support and troubles to victory, and the years after.…
This was an age of social involvement and political progression in the United States between the period of 1890 and 1920s. The main reason for undergoing this process was to purify the government by making efforts to eliminate corruption by revealing the political masters and machines. A large number of citizens supported the movement to ensure the elimination of the political masters that concentrated in public houses. Women’s suffrage was noticeable that was aimed at ensuring purer women’s participation in the field. The movement began at the local levels and grew up to the national levels. Besides the…
era, a rise in the efforts from larger more powerful groups presented itself once again…