Design
Research question: how to find the absolute uncertainty of a conical flask?
Variables: Independent variable: volume of water to be measured Dependent variable: mass of water Controlled variable: temperature wind speed type of chemical solution (water)
Apparatus: A 100 mL conical flask
A 4 decimal place electronic balance
Distilled water
A 250 mL beaker
A dropper
Tissue paper
Procedure:
1) The conical flask was weighted with the balance and the value was recorded.
2) The beaker was filled with distilled water and the water was added into the conical flask up to the 60 mL mark. The dropper was used when water level was approaching the 60 mL mark.
3) The weight of the conical flask containing water was recorded.
4) The mass of water was found by subtracting the weight of conical flask from the weight of conical flask with water.
5) The volume of water was found from the mass of water .
6) Steps 1) to 5) were repeated ten times.
7) 60 mL was subtracted from each of the calculated volume of water.
8) The data obtained from step 7) were compared with each other and the largest value was taken as the absolute uncertainty of the conical flask.
-The volume of water poured into the conical flask was being decided while the uncertainty of the conical flask, calculated from the experimental volume subtracting theoretical volume of water, was being investigated.
-The same conical flask and electronic balance was used throughout the experiment to ensure the results were not to be affected by the difference in apparatus used. -The volume readings were taken from the bottom of the meniscus of liquid and it was made sure all the liquid was emptied to ensure accurate reading of volume.
- A dropper was used when the water level approached 50 mL mark of the conical flask to prevent solution from overflowing the mark and to ensure accurate reading of volume of solution.
-Only distilled water was used in the experiment to access fair results in all rounds of experiments.
-The uncertainties of the balance were neglected because the value (±0.0001g) was too small and has very little effect on the results. -10 sets of data were taken into account for more accurate results. -The experiment was done in room temperature and in an environment of same wind speed to prevent the experimental results from being affected.
-The exterior and the upper 1/3 part of the interior of the conical flask was wiped dry with tissue paper before every set of experiment was carried out to assure accurate measurement of the mass of water contained.
-The density of water is assumed to be 1 g/dm³.
Data Collection and Presentation
(A) Mass of conical flask used: 66.7258 g
Observations: -The value displayed on the balance sometimes fluctuated within 0.0004 g when the conical flask with water was being weighed.
Tables of Results
Rough Collected Data (corrected to 4 d.p.)
Experiment
round
Mass of conical flask together with water up to 60mL mark (g)
1
124.3510
2
124.6126
3
124.5128
4
125.0068
5
125.6183
6
124.5978
7
124.9737
8
124.3511
9
125.6626
10
125.9358
Processed Data (corrected to 4 d.p.)
Experiment
round
Mass of conical flask together with water up to 60mL mark (g)
(M) Mass of water(g)
= Volume of water
(cm³)
Difference in mass of water from theoretical value (M-60)
1
124.3510
57.5982
-2.4018
2
124.6126
57.8868
-2.1132
3
124.5128
57.7600
-2.2400
4
125.0068
58.2540
-1.7460
5
125.6183
58.8925
-1.1075
6
124.5978
57.8720
-2.1280
7
124.9737
58.2479
-1.7521
8
124.3511
57.6253
-2.3747
9
125.6626
58.9368
-1.0632
10
125.9358
59.2100
-0.7900
The mass of water (M) was obtained by “mass of conical flask together with water up to 60mL mark - mass of conical flask used (A)”; the difference in mass of water from theoretical value (D) was obtained by M-60. The largest absolute value of D was taken as the absolute uncertainty of the conical flask as it is the greatest difference from the theoretical value.
Therefore,
Absolute uncertainty of a 100mL conical flask
= 2.4018 mL
= 2 mL (1 s.f.)
The result of the experiment has shown that the uncertainty of a 100mL conical flask is 2mL. Comparing to a 100 mL volumetric flask, which has absolute uncertainty of 0.08mL, a conical flask is rather uncertain and will give inaccurate results. This explains why a conical flask is usually used for holding chemicals (for example in titration, it is used for containing the solution being titrated against and the indicator) instead of used for giving measurements.
In this experiment, an observation was that the value displayed on the balance fluctuated within 0.0004 g. This observation was noted as it implied that even though the wind speed was kept constant around the environment (for example fans and air conditioner turned off), the movements generated by man or usage of balance had minor effect on the accuracy of the result. The effect of these small errors on the result can be eliminated by carrying out more rounds of the experiment, or by repeating with different electronic balances.
Further investigation could be done on finding the values of uncertainty of different sizes and grades of conical flasks. By repeating the experiment with different sizes and grades of conical flasks, we can gain understanding in different instruments and the result might be used as reference in future experiments involving conical flasks.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Alicia and Dan | 7.94 x 10-6 | ± 5.06 x 10-6 | -5571.4% | Uncertainties: 10 mL volumetric flask | ± 0.02 | 25 mL volumetric flask | ± 0.03 | 1 mL volumetric pipet | ± 0.006 | 5 mL volumetric pipet | ± 0.01 | 4 mL volumetric pipet | ± 0.015 | 3 mL volumetric pipet | ± 0.010 | 50 mL graduated…
- 1473 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Using the buret to read the volume of water is a source of random error because it is marked to the nearest 0.1mL. Therefore, our data could be above or below the actual volume of water in the buret because we took our reading to the nearest 0.01mL, which increases our uncertainty level. Along with taking our volume readings to the nearest 0.01mL, a random error also arose when we took the reading of the temperature of the water. The thermometer only read to the nearest tens places, therefore our readings went to only the tenths place which could have been measured inaccurately giving rise to more uncertainty and random error within the lab. We were able to limit our uncertainty level when taking the masses of the beaker with and without water, by using the analytical balances which read to the nearest ±0.0001g.…
- 992 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
2. Calculate the density (g/mL) of the unknown liquid (B) for each trial. (Divide the mass (g) of the liquid calculated above (A) by the volume (mL) of the liquid [2])…
- 424 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
For the purposes of this experiment, the mass will be measured using a digital balance and the volume will be measured directly using a ruler and calculated using the volume formula {fig.1} for a cylinder.…
- 2742 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Procedure: In the experiment, I use devices such as a ruler, beakers, flasks, a scale and cylinders to measure the values of each object and liquid.…
- 942 Words
- 9 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
A graduated cylinder was used for measuring the volumes of the liquid. When measuring the volumes be sure to be eye level with the meniscus. Any other position when looksing at the container will cause an error in the experiment.…
- 213 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The experiment performed was Experiment IV: Fluid Flow Meters and Tray Hydraullics. The group was composed of Alex Long, Khanh Ho, Tricia Heitmann and myself. The first day of experimentation was April 16, 2013. On this day, Alex and I ran the sieve tray apparatus to study the vapor and liquid tray hydraulics parameters for sieve type crossflow distillation trays. Tricia and Khanh ran the fluid flow apparatus to determine the operating characteristics of the Venturi and orifice meters.…
- 6399 Words
- 26 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Calculate the density of the unknown liquid for each trial. (Divide the mass of the liquid calculated above by the volume of the liquid.)…
- 463 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In this experiment, we first measured the mass of an empty flask using the balance for our…
- 1294 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
1. Measure 50 mL tap water using the graduated cylinder then add it to one of the beakers…
- 1094 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
III. Procedure: 1.We massed an empty 10mL graduated cylinder to the nearest .01g. 2.Then, we filled the graduated cylinder with 4.0-5.0 mL of distilled water, 3.massed it to the nearest 0.1 ml and 4. recorded the data. Then to determine the density of the unknown liquid; we repeated the steps.…
- 264 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Which piece of glassware was the most accurate? Why might that be true? 25ml Erlenmeyer flask, this may have been contributed by the shape of the glass and also the way it is calibrated. ©2014,CarolinaBiologicalSupplyCompany 3 MEASUREMENT AND UNCERTAINTY General Lab Questions 1. Consider an experiment to determine the average rate of reaction of an antacid in water.…
- 589 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
We went from a big flask to a small beaker to an even smaller pipette. We used a scale to get the appropriate weight of the water in the different beakers.…
- 405 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
been previously done. After the mass of water was measured, the beaker and graduated cylinder were…
- 1151 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
What buret reading should you record when the liquid level is as shown in Figure 2?…
- 635 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays