assists the principal chief and secretary of state with all day to day operation of the…
I read the book and I also read the two other things you recommended. I was touched mainly by Elsie’s business and the article by Andrea Smith. I am a Cherokee and have always lived in the white world. I only have 1/16 Cherokee blood. I have seen documentaries about life on the reservation , but have never experienced it. I also have watched a series called Longmire set in town in Wyoming near an Indian reservation. They also talk about sex crimes against Indian women. I was so saddened reading Elsie’s story and the article by Andrea Smith. I understand how stupid people were in the way past , not saying it was right but they were ignorant. What I do not understand is how even in modern times the 1950’s, 1960’s and so on the way…
The Eastern Band of Cherokees resisted termination of tribal status and federal responsibilities in Indian affairs during 1940s and 1950s. “For the Eastern Cherokees, the battle over termination began in January 1947” (Nichols, 328). House Concurrent Resolution 108 was an act that called for the abolition of several Indian offices and termination trust responsibilities for certain specified tribes. The Public Law 280 was passed in 1953, which “transferred civil and criminal jurisdiction over most tribes states to the respective local governments and allowed any states to assume similar jurisdiction over their own Indian reservations” (Nichols, 335). The terminationists noted that the Indians deserved better treatment instead of being second-class citizenship because they served well in the war. They stated the Indians should become part of the mainstream American society.…
The Cherokee tribe splits up into three different tribes; Cherokee Nation, United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians, and Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians. Cherokee was one of the first, if not the first non-European ethnic group to become US citizens. This is one of the largest groups with an estimated population of 25,000 members. It is the largest of all of the Southern tribes. The Cherokee Nation had approximately 135,000 of land in North America. Eventually it extended from the Ohio River in the north to what is the state of Alabama to the South today.…
In view of the Choctaw tribe, their lots of things today's generation does not know that went about on/inside their reservation. There are things like their geographic location, clothing, historical impact, housing and reputation that no one could have never thought about that went on at reservations in America.…
The article of the story of The Removal of the Cherokees presents the hardships which the Cherokees went through while moving west after being kicked out of their territory in Georgia. This event in history shows how ungrateful people are, the unfairness of life, and how to this day somethings have not changed. To begin with, one of the things in this article that really makes me see how ungrateful some people are is the fact that Andrew Jackson and Chief Junaluska fought together in the Battle of Horse Shoe. These men trusted each other enough to trust each other with their lives. Junaluska even saved Jackson’s life during battle and when Januluska asked him if he could help protect his people Jackson did nothing to help him.…
Unfortunately, despite how precisely Indians followed white men’s laws and requirements, the Indian Removal would have eventually transpired. The Five Civilized Tribes shed their Indian traditions and culture to take on the Americans way of life. Indians not only adopted principles in government and agriculture, but also religiously. Despite all of this, whites still wanted to kick Indians out of their lands in order to bring profit to themselves. Even the national government could not terminate the Indian Removal. Through both the United States Constitution and Worcester v. Georgia, the national government declared that states could not operate the removal of Indians. All of this, illustrates the inhumanity and lack of compassion whites had…
The Cherokee Removal is a brief history with documents by Theda Perdue and Michael Green. In 1838-1839 the US troops expelled the Cherokee Indians from their ancestral homeland in the Southeast and removed them to the Indian Territory in what is now Oklahoma. The removal of the Cherokees was a product of the demand for land during the growth of cotton agriculture in the Southeast, the discovery of gold on the Cherokees land, and the racial prejudice that many white southerners had toward the Indians.…
There were some reasons why the Cherokees moved in the first place. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 justified because the Indians did things that are very uncalled for. They did things like, scalping men, women, and children alive. and They also burned them on stakes. Also the Cherokees agree to move because they signed a treaty that if they sign it they agreed to move. Plus when they move they get to receive five million dollars and they also get a lot of land. So the Cherokees agree to move and get land and five million dollars and the Americans don’t want to die.…
The Cherokee nation is one of the many North American native cultures directly affected by the European white settlers. Even in ancient times, they were a very civilized and progressive people. Their culture was mainly agrarian, but focused around ceremonies, music, art, and games. Prior to the arrival of the Europeans, “the Cherokee history was passed down orally from generation to generation” (The Cherokee Nation). They adapted to the white settlers by embracing their “formal education, developing a written language, adopting a constitution, and building a capitol city” (Maddox 105).…
Land disputes and law jurisdiction cases had begun to appear quite frequently in the United States Supreme Court during the time the Indian Policy was put into effect after the war. Congress had to address the situation so they came up with the Indian Policy. It was concluded that, “discovery also gave the discoverer the exclusive right to extinguish Indian title either by purchase or by conquest. Natives were recognized only as temporary occupants of the land, and not as owners (Learn NC). The decision to move the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River, decided by the Jackson administration, was more of a reformulation of the national policy that had been in effect since the 1790’s.…
The concept of race, according to Rosenberg, has been “entangled with the notion of ‘civilization’” (Rosenberg 316). Past historians studying races tended to compare them through their respective cultural tenets and such methodology was susceptible to establishing a hierarchical construction of race. William Fyffe, although not a historian, proceeds to document the discrepancies and similarities between the Cherokee Indians and the colonials in his letter to his brother. According to Fyffe, the Cherokees valued war and orderly communication amongst one another and these cultural beliefs were rather antithetical to European culture.…
According to Sean Wilentz, the Indian Removal “has, in recent historical writing, become the great moral stain on the Jacksonian legacy, much as it was to Christian humanitarian reformers in 1829 and 1830 a policy, supposedly, that aimed at the ‘infantilization’ and ‘genocide’ of the Indians.”6 Many Americans were against this legislation because they believed that Americans were taking the rights of Indians and treating them as slaves. The removal came from the threat Native Americans gave. They wanted to be able to have their own constitution, separating them from the US. One of Jackson’s biggest fears was that “sovereign Indian nations would prove easy prey for manipulation by hostile foreign powers.”7 To Jackson, all Indians were inferiors to whites, and the Indian removal Act was an act that would give land to white settlers. He argued that the legislation would provide land for white citizens, improve security against foreign invaders and encourage the civilization of the Native Americans. Andrew Jackson even argued in one speech, this "will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions; will retard the progress of decay, which is lessening their numbers, and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the government and through the influences of good…
Another, issue that arises when historians talk about the Indian Removal Act is that what values and whose needs were meet when the decision was made. The values that were meet were in the eyes of the American dream to keep expanding from sea to sea. Also, the needs that were met were the needs from both sides but the majority of the needs met were the ones from the Americans because they got land and prosperity out of the law, while the indians got a long and dreadful experience across the country to their new lands that were protected by the American…
In May 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, this approved that the President Andrew Jackson could remove all Native Americans from their land and to arrange settlements of evacuation with every single Indian tribe living east of the Mississippi. After the Indian Removal act was established Georgia, surveyors and squatter entered Cherokee lands, instantly focusing on the Cherokee tribe, they chose to battle back in government court. The Cherokee country brought a suit against the condition of Georgia in the US Supreme Court, Chief Justice Marshall said the case needed purview since the Cherokees were not US residents or a free country. This expressing all Indians are not genuinely American subjects. Following in the following year a…