Preview

What Was The Significance Of The Indian Removal Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
889 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Was The Significance Of The Indian Removal Act
In May 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, this approved that the President Andrew Jackson could remove all Native Americans from their land and to arrange settlements of evacuation with every single Indian tribe living east of the Mississippi. After the Indian Removal act was established Georgia, surveyors and squatter entered Cherokee lands, instantly focusing on the Cherokee tribe, they chose to battle back in government court. The Cherokee country brought a suit against the condition of Georgia in the US Supreme Court, Chief Justice Marshall said the case needed purview since the Cherokees were not US residents or a free country. This expressing all Indians are not genuinely American subjects. Following in the following year a …show more content…
Georgia and the court finished guaranteeing that the Cherokee Nation was "an unmistakable group involving its own region" this implying the laws in Georgia can't be implemented. This choice was a standout amongst the most imperative things to glad in the history for US and Indian connections, yet regardless it didn't change the Indian Removal Act. Around then the south was creating about portion of the cotton on the planet, developing rich incrementally, the southern Indians land was to a great degree profitable; they were confronted with evacuation, the greater part of which chosen to take off. The Significance of the Indian Removal Act was Indians lost the privilege to their claim arrive and were constrained out by the states all through the southeast. The Removal Act is additionally what is paving the way to the Trail of Tears, compelling Native Americans to move to Oklahoma. The constitution was severely violated with the Indian Removal Act. Taking their ancestral land and being forced to move violated the Native Americans …show more content…
The condition of Georgia, in any case, did not perceive their sovereign status, but rather considered them to be inhabitants living on state arrive. President Jackson declined to implement the choice, leaving the Cherokee helpless before Georgia's predations. Arrangements with the Jackson organization was impossible. The awful impacts of the Indian Removal Act were quite recently obtuse and compelling evacuation of the Indians ought to have been a final resort if America couldn't think of a serene
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq
    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. This act called for the government to make treaties that required Native Americans to relocate west. Jackson thought that this policy was “just and liberal.” He thought the Native Americans would be able to keep their way of life. He was wrong. The Indian Removal Act brought a lot of hardship to the Native Americans. It also forever changed the relationship between whites and Native Americans. Before Jackson passed this act, he gave the Native Americans two choices. The two choices were that they could take on white culture and become citizens of the United States, or they could move to the Western territories and keep their…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act Dbq
    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Removal Act Dbq

    After years of assimilating to White culture and building a successful, independent economy, the question of whether or not Native Americans residing in the southern states and specifically the Cherokee in Georgia should be removed was hotly debated until the ratification of the Removal Act in 1830.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Policy: Cruelty Or A Fair Policy
    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Policy: Cruelty Or A Fair Policy

    The Indian Removal Act went against the indian’s rights, and the indians did not want to move off their land. The Indians were forced off their land because of the Indian Removal Act. The Cherokee tried to go to court to fight the Indian Removal Act, explaining that the act was against their rights. The Cherokee did lose, and eventually were forced to follow the Indian Removal Act. The Native Americans that were moved also had rights to original land they lived on. For example, the Cherokee had a written constitution that explained that the Cherokee had full control of the land. That did…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Andrew Jackson
    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Andrew Jackson

    Although Jackson was out of office when the Indian Removal act was actually carried out, he had set its path into motion, and shares just as much credit for the act if not more than his presidential and ideological successor, Martin Van Buren. As Jackson saw it, the tribes were not part of the union, but sovereign nations, so why should they have any sort of protection from the federal government? The is the notable minority as stated earlier. Their land, unfortunately according to Jackson, belonged in and to the states they resided in. Jackson was also a strong supporter of…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Removal of Indian Tribes in 1700
    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Removal of Indian Tribes in 1700

    In 1971 the Cherokee tribe was in the process of making treaties with United States. The state of Georgia recognized the Cherokee tribe as a nation allowing them to make their own laws and follow their native customs. In the late 1700’s their land started to be invaded by the white man. The Cherokee Indians began to move to Arkansas. (Historical Context) I believe the Indians were taken advantage of and had no option but to move when their land was taken away from them. Georgia and the United States had no regard for the treaties that were put in place. The treaties changed depending on who was in office at the time, the Indians had no choice but to move and give up their land. United States v. Georgia, Chief Justice John Marshall, stated “the Cherokee nation was a domestic independent nation, and therefore Georgia state law applied to them.” When Georgia continued to press the tribe for their land the “Treaty Party” began to make treaties with the federal government to give up their land. The majority of the tribe disagreed with the New Echota treaty where their land was sold for $5 million dollars and the tribe had to move beyond the Mississippi River. Due to corrupt government and the demands of President Andrew Jackson and President Martin Van Buren in 1838, the Indians were “rounded up” and forced off their land and moved to other states.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Overview of Indian Removal Act 1830
    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Overview of Indian Removal Act 1830

    When the Native Americans lived east of the Mississippi river, they didn’t want to follow the law and be part of U.S. government and wanted to govern their own people. Andrew Jackson being a president of United States didn’t want the group to ignore the government therefore, proposed to move them west of the Mississippi river. In order to justify and keep threats away from the U.S. settlers, the U.S. government promised them bigger land, money, pay for their needs and support for one year as said in the excerpt from Indian Removal Act 1830 (source 1). This act should be justified because it resolved the conflicts between the U.S. and the Indies were given comparable land and support. In Source 2 Andrew Jackson makes a speech about if the Indians movie it will benefit the U.S. and make Alabama and Mississippi stronger.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Was Andrew Jackson Hero Or Misfit?
    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Who Was Andrew Jackson Hero Or Misfit?

    America, the nation started on the idea of a nation free from oppression has a dark often shameful history. The Trail of Tears following the Indian removal act is a perfect representation with direct legislature to prove it. Now I have to say that former president Andrew Jackson was a person I greatly admired and often visited the hallowed statue in New Orleans that stands ever vigilant as a visual tribute the man who stood with few to fight the many and came out victorious. Some historians view Jackson as a very controversial President, However historians will often agree that the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was not popular until, later on in retrospect but at the time seemed to be a viable option.” This area was home to the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw and Seminole nations. These Indian nations, in the view of the settlers and many other white Americans, were standing in the way of progress. Eager for land to raise cotton, the settlers pressured the federal government to acquire Indian territory”.(pbs) The Indians being moved, had already been pushed out of the coastal regions now claimed by the new Americas and were now being moved again,…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Indian Removal Act Of 1830 Analysis
    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Indian Removal Act Of 1830 Analysis

    The Indian Removal act of 1830 was in short; an act made law by Andrew Jackson relocating many Native American tribes west of the Mississippi river to unsettled lands. This would open up safer territory for those looking to colonize further west than the original thirteen colonies. Here are four men’s messages regarding the act that gives further insight into it all.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee Removal Book Review
    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Cherokee Removal Book Review

    The Cherokee Removal is a brief history with documents by Theda Perdue and Michael Green. In 1838-1839 the US troops expelled the Cherokee Indians from their ancestral homeland in the Southeast and removed them to the Indian Territory in what is now Oklahoma. The removal of the Cherokees was a product of the demand for land during the growth of cotton agriculture in the Southeast, the discovery of gold on the Cherokees land, and the racial prejudice that many white southerners had toward the Indians.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Did The Highlight The Nullification Crisis
    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did The Highlight The Nullification Crisis

    Following a discovery of gold in northern Georgia and a recommendation from President James Monroe, Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830. In the Supreme Court case Cherokee Nation vs Georgia in 1831 the court ruled in favor of Georgia, however in Worcester vs Georgia in 1832 the court ruled in favor of the Cherokees. Jackson ignored the rulings and instead enforced the removal. The U.S. government used the Treaty of Echota in 1835 as leverage to justify the indian removal. The treaty, signed by about 100 Cherokees, gave up all land east of the Mississippi in exchange for land, livestock, money and other goods in Indian…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Cherokee Indians
    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page

    Dbq Cherokee Indians

    President Andrew Jackson made a stupid decision. An Indian tribe called the Cherokee were forced to move from their land so that the U.S could expand. They had a choice to move to the Indian Territory or stay but live under the Georgia law. Although the Cherokee had some caused trouble, they shouldn’t be kicked out because they had Georgia first, fought on the U.S side during the war of 1812, and were treated poorly by the Americans.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act DBQ
    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Indian Removal Act DBQ

    The Indian Removal Act was a passage brought into play in the mid-1830s. At the time, Andrew Jackson was the President of the U.S. who was responsible for signing the law into action. After a mere two days of discussion, Jackson signed the law. In Layman's terms, Jackson was about to go into the territory controlled by the Indian tribes in the south and essentially force them to vacate and transition to land that was located near the Mississippi River. One must understand that they territory controlled by these Indian tribes as aforementioned was their ancestral homeland. This was not an area that was recently occupied. It was in the control of the Indian tribes for decades upon decades. This is the land that they had grown up on and had called…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson's Encroachments To Native Americans
    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson's Encroachments To Native Americans

    During Andrew Jackson's presidency, there was many encroachments to the Native Americans including the Indian Removal Act of 1830, Trail of Tears, and the Black Hawk War. All of which were a conflict or feud with the Natives and the Americans. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was put into place when Cherokee Indians, living in the states, were learning the language and culture of the Americans. In response to this, Andrew Jackson issued the Indian Removal Act. This act sent for the removal of all Indian tribes living within US borders, including the Cherokee, Creeks, Choctaws, Chickasaws, and Seminole Indians. All these Indians were uprooted and ordered to relocate to Indian Territory that was west of the Mississippi River. The journey of the…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act And The Trail Of Tears Analysis
    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act And The Trail Of Tears Analysis

    In 1830, Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act. The Indian Removal Act was a law that authorized the president to remove southern Indian tribes out of their homes and to travel to the federal territory west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their lands. The Trail of Tears was the forced relocation trail for the Native tribes. The multiple sources regarding the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears help shape the reader's understanding of the event because you get different perspectives on the situation.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Essay
    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Indian Removal Act Essay

    “Like rain, the tears of anguish fell, sad moments locked in time …. Where each tear fell, as some will tell, will be seen a Cherokee rose,” (“A Cherokee Rose” by Rick Brown), tells that thousands of Cherokees were forced out of their homes and start heading west, during the trip to Oklahoma at least 4,000 Cherokee died. Many Cherokees died suffering through cruel and unfair government. In 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act, which was a law that forced Native Americans out of their land. In 1838 to 1839, 16,000 Cherokees were forced to walk 600 miles from Georgia to Oklahoma. The Cherokees did try to rebel against the United States government but it didn’t go as well as planned. President Jackson…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics