Preview

China's position on disarmament POSITION PAPER

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
413 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
China's position on disarmament POSITION PAPER
Background:
Disarmament is an important and also an unresolved problem that needs to be taken more in count. We have called for the abandonment of terrorism and violence of all forms, closer regional economic cooperation and the realization of common development and prosperity.
United States and Russian arms control and arms reduction treaties such as the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty are considered to be positive steps, but it is also acknowledged that the road to the ultimate goal remains tenuous and full of difficult twists and turns.
In rhetoric if not in substance, China is no stranger to the idea of nuclear disarmament. China’s 2008 Defense White Paper reiterates the position that “China holds that all nuclear-weapon states should make an unequivocal commitment to the thorough destruction of nuclear weapons, undertake to stop research into and development of new types of nuclear weapons, and reduce the role of nuclear weapons in their national security policy.” In addition, China has always advocated peace talks and it has also played a unique role in facilitating the Middle East peace process.

Country’s Position:
Beijing called for complete prohibition and thorough destruction of all nuclear weapons on the very same day it conducted its first nuclear test on October 16, 1964. China has always closely followed the situation in the Middle East, attached importance to advancing its peace process, and actively supported the efforts for the establishment of a nuclear-weapon free zone.
Nuclear disarmament should stick to the principles of maintaining global strategic balance and stability and undiminished security for all. The development of missile defense systems that undermine global strategic balance and stability should be abandoned.

Justification and Summary:
China is willing to work with the international community to make continued efforts for and contribution to the restoration of peace in



Bibliography: NTI: Nuclear Threat Initiative. 2013. Nuclear Disarmament China | NTI. [online] Available at: http://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/china-nuclear-disarmament/ [Accessed: 15 Oct 2013]. Saferworld.org.uk. 2013. Details - Safer world. [online] Available at: http://www.saferworld.org.uk/expertise/staff-details/29-china-arms-control-and-disarmament-association-%28cacda%29 [Accessed: 16 Oct 2013]. Fmprc.gov.cn. 2013. Fact Sheet: China: Nuclear Disarmament and Reduction of. [online] Available at: http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/wjb/zzjg/jks/cjjk/2622/t93539.htm [Accessed: 16 Oct 2013].

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    In both cases, protagonists were influenced by the particular events, their domestic and geo-political state of affairs and the signals delivered and counter offers made from parties involved. This essay analyses the scenario, role of actors, and description of the outcomes of the two crises. The paper argues that the advent of the nuclear age, following World War II in 1945, shaped contemporary international relations. What makes the Cuban Missile Crisis fundamentally different was precisely because it occurred during nuclear age. This essay will outline some of the concepts such as deterrence, mutual assured destruction doctrine, and the concept of balance of terror to justify why the nuclear age has shaped events after World War II. The essay concludes by affirming the need to rethink and revisit the role of nuclear weapons in the 21st century.…

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cited: Hanley, Charles J. "Abolishing Nukes: Flicker of Hope to Global Cause." Msnbc.com. The Associated Press, 2010. Web. 10 Aug. 2014.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    I clearly recognize that defensive systems have limitations and raise certain problems and ambiguities. If paired with offensive systems, they can be viewed as fostering an aggressive policy, and no one wants that. But with these considerations firmly in mind, I call upon the scientific community in our country, those who gave us nuclear weapons, to turn their great talents now to the cause of mankind and world peace, to give us the means of rendering these nuclear weapons impotent and obsolete.…

    • 5226 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The advent of nuclear weapons dawned a new and terrifying era in human history. The destructive power of the atomic bomb, demonstrated at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, ushered in a global climate of fear. Emerging from the rubble of the Second World War, the U.S. and Soviet Union became the two most dominant economic, political, and military superpowers in the global arena. Upholding fundamental ideological differences, the U.S. and Soviet Union became entrenched in their respective camps of capitalism and communism. Having acquired nuclear weapons, and illustrated their ability to use them, the U.S challenged the Soviet Union’s military might. The Soviet Union promptly accepted this challenge by successfully acquiring nuclear capabilities on par with the U.S. In effect, a nuclear arms race ensued and the Cold War began. Fear of nuclear annihilation ultimately swept across the globe and into the homes of American citizens.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Non Proliferation act of 1968 was created to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. 85 percent of the world’s countries signed it. Non nuclear countries agreed to not make or accept nukes from anyone. Countries that had them could not build or share them. The International Atomic Energy Agency was created by the UN to inspect countries to ensure nuclear facilities were operating under peaceful terms but the NPT hasn 't been entirely successful. India and Pakistan tested nukes in 1998 and Israel 's nuclear capability is an open secret. None of those countries signed the NPT in 1968. North Korea did sign the treaty in 1970 but violated it in the 1990s when it started developing nukes and more recently in 2006 when they tested one.…

    • 3654 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The long-term effect of nuclear weapons has primarily been deterring their use, but its use in short-term strategies have been…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Sanger, David E., Baker, Peter. “Obama Limits When U.S. Would Use Nuclear Arms”. The New York Times. The New York Times Company, April 5, 2010. Web. January 23, 2014.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iran’s nuclear program and nuclear weapons have grown exponentially since 2003 threatening Middle-Eastern countries and America. Iran has had a nuclear program since the 1950’s when the U.S. helped launch it as part of the Atoms For Peace program. But since then, the program has grown with out regulation from the I.A.E.A.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bush Doctrine Unethical

    • 2703 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Protocol and withdrawing from the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) treaty send a signal to the rest…

    • 2703 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear weapons have only ever been used once in human history, and that was during World War II when The United States deployed missiles on Japanese territory, in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. At the time of bombing in 1945 only the USA had developed nuclear weapons, whilst today the pool of states consisting of nuclear weapons is still extremely small, with only nine states laying claim to nuclear technology and weaponry. This nuclear proliferation is explained by Darryl Howlett who explains this as the worldwide spread of nuclear weapons. For Howlett states are nuclear driven because of the ‘strategic, political and prestige benefits’ attached to nuclear weapons[1]. In the modern world the mass media are often critical about nuclear weapons and the threats they pose for society, but this begs the question; why have nuclear weapons not been used in conflict since 1945? To answer this question the issues of taboo and deterrence and the arrival of virtual nuclear arsenals must be called into question, as well as theoretical ideas such as rationality from proliferation optimists and proliferation pessimists. I will also look at whether we currently live in a non-proliferation regime, and look at the alternatives for peace and nuclear non-usage.…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Haile Selassie

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Disarmament has become the urgent imperative of our time. I do not say this because I equate the absence of arms o peace, or because I believe that bringing an end to nuclear arms race automatically guarantees the peace…Disarmament is vital today, quite simply, because of the immense destructive capacity of which men dispose.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Nuclear Paradox

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages

    60 years and some 23,000 nuclear warheads later, since the bombing of Hiroshima, the question that faces the U.S and their allies alike “is less how a nation might array its nuclear forces and more how to stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons from spinning out of control”. The very nuclear weapons created to deter attack and ultimately bring about peace are also the cause for ambiguity among world nations, the hole in which millions of tax payers dollars are cast, and the heart of unease felt worldwide by those who fear their amazing destructive power in the wrong hands. The national vision of peace has been misconstrued and wrapped the Americas in a paradoxical ideology of safety that has allowed us to live in “a peace that is no peace”, trapped in the middle of a world wide “Mexican Standoff”.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Recently, A.Q. Khan, the father of Pakistan’s nuclear bomb, has revealed that he has been selling nuclear weapons technology to Libya and other rogue states. This revelation added more fear with the attack of 9/11, envisioning nuclear destruction. President Bush had many thoughts on how to help eliminate nuclear proliferation and treated it as a very important subject. “Our message to proliferators must be consistent and must be clear. We will find you, and we’re not going to rest until you’re stopped.” Many believe a plan of attack is the best way to stop nuclear proliferation. It is true, that if men like A.Q. Khan are eliminated, the threat of proliferation will be greatly reduced. However, experts are more concerned with the safety of our own nuclear weapons.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays