Christopher simmons primarily had been trialed in the District Court of St. Louis in the same year of the crime which was 1993. The District Court of St. Louis had sentenced Christopher Simmons to death row. After the sentence Christopher Simmons had several appeals to the federal courts that had been rejected numerous of times. In 2002 the Supreme Court of Missouri had finally reviewed the case of Christopher Simmons. The Supreme Court of Missouri had stayed the death sentence primarily, finding the punishment completely normal. After the court had stayed the sentence; Christopher Simmons …show more content…
With many successful actors, singers, painters, entrepreneurs, make their everyday decisions by themselves to get to they are today. Giving the fact that unless you need help mentally, everyone should be in control of their actions, and control who you associate yourself with. I personally wouldn't ever try to do that when I was younger, nor if I’m older as in right now. He had motives, he had planned it out for months, and he even knew people who'd assist him with such crime. Yes there are facts that show that the male brain is more likely to be persuaded and being taken advantage of in these type of situations, but no one has been taking advantage of Christopher Simmons nor forcing him to do anything. This is all on his personal opinions, morales, logic, and his own mindset. That is why I think that Christopher Simmons should've been sentenced to