Preview

Citizens United Vs Fec Pros And Cons

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
194 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Citizens United Vs Fec Pros And Cons
Citizens United v. FEC allowed for corporations and labor unions to spend as much as they wanted in order to convince the public either to vote for or against a candidate. They are protected by the First Amendment, which allows for them to have unlimited spending. However, the Supreme Court argued that it is illegal for corporations or labor unions to give money directly to candidate. The Supreme Court argued that if corporations or labor unions give money directly to a candidate, it could lead to corruption. Ultimately, I agree with the Supreme Court decision that it is illegal for them to do this and agree that they can persuade the public through other methods. For instance, corporations and labor unions can persuade the public through ads

Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Write A Case Brief. 38-1 Federal Election Comm N V Harvard
    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Write A Case Brief. 38-1 Federal Election Comm N V Harvard

    A unanimous court in National Right to Work did not think the regulatory burdens on PAC’s, including restrictions on their ability to solicit funds, rendered a PAC unconstitutional as an advocacy corporation’s sole avenue for making political contributions.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Case Essay: The Texas Vs. Cobb
    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Case Essay: The Texas Vs. Cobb

    In the Texas vs Cobb case a man named Raymond Levi Cobb was first arrested in 1994 and confessed to a home burglary. In this process he denied that he killed the woman and child in the home but later confessed to his father which his father then went to report this to the police. Even though Cobb later waived his Miranda rights and confessed he was still indicted and sentenced to death. Cobb argued to the Texas Court of Appeals that after his confession he was denied his right to counsel because his request for an attorney wasn’t renewed after the burglary case. The Court later said that the right to counsel carries onto the reason charged if any other offenses are closely related to the case. It was then declared with a five to four vote under…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Has Campaign Finance Reform in the Usa Proved Difficult?
    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Has Campaign Finance Reform in the Usa Proved Difficult?

    A way that the campaign finance reform proved difficult was that there were many loopholes to try and get under the law; the Supreme Court strengthened this in 1976, in the Buckley and Valeo Case, the Supreme Court ruled that limitations on what individuals could spend either supporting or opposing a candidate infringed the 1st Amendment rights of freedom of religion, speech, press and assembly and were therefore unconstitutional.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission: Case Study
    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission: Case Study

    Valeo and McConnell and Wisconsin Right To Life, independent expenditures mustn 't be touched by the government. Subsequently, corporate contributions and their requirements have also come under scrutiny by critics of the Citizens United ruling. This case deals solely, with independent expenditures as it upholds the previous rulings that corporations must disclose their contributions to candidates. It was written by Justice Kennedy during the Supreme Court 's hearing of Citizens United v. FEC, "Disclosure permits citizens and shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way." Donating to campaigns, therefore must be regulated in order to prevent corruption, but is still an effective way to communicate to voters and candidates. Most important, the verdict of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, upholds the ideal that corporations must be treated as…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Campaign Finance Reform
    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Campaign Finance Reform

    As one can see, campaign finance reform has been around for a while, not that many people were really aware of it until the Citizens United v. FEC case of 2010. Citizens United was founded in 1988 by a Washington political consultant, Floyd Brown who received major funding from the Koch brothers, industrialist who own the secondly largest privately owned company in the US (Mayer, 2010). They gained fame by suing the Federal Election Commission (FEC), leading to a notorious Supreme Court case which eliminated some restrictions on how corporations can spend money in elections. Back in 1971, the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was the main United States federal law that regulates political fundraising and spending. Its original focus was…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros and Cons of Article V of the United States Constitution
    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros and Cons of Article V of the United States Constitution

    The United States Constitution is one of the most significant documents in modern world history. Its official date of adoption was on the seventeenth of September in 1897. The Constitution itself represents the advent of democracy, justice and freedom in a once-was colony which thereafter gained its independence. It established three branches of government; the legislative branch, the judicial branch and the executive branch. Additionally, the Constitution outlined the relationship between the country’s citizens and the Federal government.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Corwin Amendment Pros And Cons
    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Corwin Amendment Pros And Cons

    Throughout the existence of the United States Constitution the have been many additions of new amendments to it. While most of them have succeeded the process and entered the Constitution, there are a few that failed to do so. Thomas Corwin, an Ohio Representative, proposed the Slavery Amendment, otherwise known as the Corwin Amendment. This amendment failed however, as only two states had ratified it.º…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons

    guarantee the honesty of the power allowed to Court Justices and protect them against unjust interference from either the legislative or executive branch. And also to protect our Supreme Judges from political pressure. But, I believe this can still be done by setting an specific time for the judge to leave the position and therefore, I believe it is unnecessary for judges to hold their position for lifetime.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Super PACs
    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Super PACs

    Although the Supreme Court was responsible for the Citizens United case that allows Super PACs to accept unlimited sums of money, Congress has the power pass legislation that would prohibit these organizations. Furthermore the Supreme Court has the power to reverse its previous rulings in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and Speechnow.org v. FEC. Lastly, the FEC has done a poor job of enforcing the rules that are in place regarding super PACs.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hyde Amendment Pros And Cons
    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hyde Amendment Pros And Cons

    and still have enough trouble as is, to their own (arguably limited) devices. Letting the weak struggle strikes ethical concern. Before the Hyde Amendment, Medicaid funded almost one-third of abortions in the United States, and after the Hyde Amendment the government funded just about none. However, another effect of the Hyde Amendment is that while federal funding was cut towards abortions, it did not bar states from taking on the issue. While the government would handle cases of rape, incest, and life endangerment to the mother, the states could decide to cover cases beyond that and fund them themselves.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Supreme Court Controversy: Roe V. Wade
    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page

    Supreme Court Controversy: Roe V. Wade

    A largely discussed topic and argument as we are in prime presidential election season is abortion. Are you pro-abortion or anti-abortion? Roe v. Wade is a decision that was made by the Supreme Court in the 1970's. Roe V. Wade allows women the right to privacy and the right to choose abortion, that is up until the third trimester. While Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia claimed that the Constitution does not grant women a so-called right to abortion many disagree with his claims. Scalia called Roe V. Wade an “absurdity,” he claims that the Constitution’s 14th Amendment doesn’t guarantee equal protection for women that allows abortion on demand. On one side of the controversy Roe V. Wade did not allow any states to prohibit abortion and…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Obergefell V. Hodges: Court Case Study
    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Obergefell V. Hodges: Court Case Study

    “It is better to be hated for what you are then to be loved for what you are not,” this was said by Andre Gide and there has never been a more true statement. In this paper the topic of Obergefell V. Hodges will be discussed. Obergefell V. Hodges is the court case that talks about gay marriage. Many are against the topic, but maybe they should open their minds a little more and accept that love is love.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis: The American Civil Liberties Union
    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page

    Analysis: The American Civil Liberties Union

    First, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is supporting multiple issues, but two issues stand out. The first of these issues is the death penalty, or capital punishment. Mainly, the ACLU is against the death penalty because of the lack of evidence in multiple cases and the isolated location of the death penalty. . For example, of the 1,392 executions, 995 occurred in the South. Furthermore, the ACLU is against the experimentation of drugs on other people. In fact, the execution process is far from perfect and occasionally fails, putting the prisoner in great pain and suffering.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    American Civil Liberties Union: Supreme Court Cases
    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    American Civil Liberties Union: Supreme Court Cases

    The American Civil Liberties Union was established to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to the people by the Constitution and laws of the United States. (ACLU) The rights that ACLU focuses on specifically include the fifth and first amendments, which give citizens the freedom of speech and the freedom to assembly. Founded in January of 1920, the American Civil Liberties Union was born amidst the Red Scare, where many people were being arrested without proper warrant. (ProCon) This of course led to the need for better understandings of the rights each citizen holds, and through that need the ACLU was born. The ACLU is a non-profit and non-partisan organization with its headquarters in New York. (ACLU)…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Citizens United
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Citizens United

    Almost a century ago, back to the time when the modern corporation was created, sprung the Progressive era that flourished with political reforms and social activism. Along with the corporations also came laws that have always prohibited or limited the use of corporate money in elections as a result of Progressive reform’s efforts to eliminate social and political problems, especially corruption. These specific laws have been in place up until January 21, 2010 during the landmark case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, when the Supreme Court ruled with a 5-4 majority that the government may not ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections. As a result, the court also overruled its 1990 case Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, which upheld restrictions on corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates, and partially overruled the 2003 case McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, which upheld the part of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 that restricted campaign spending by corporations and unions. The case formed when prior to the 2008 primary elections, Citizens United, a nonprofit corporation produced a 90 minute documentary entitled Hillary: The Movie. The movie conveyed opinions about whether Hillary Clinton, a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, was fit for the presidency. However, The Movie falls within the definition of "electioneering communications" under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, a federal act designed to prevent "big money" from wrongly influencing federal elections-which, as well as other things, prohibits corporate financing of "electioneering communications" and enforces “mandatory disclosure and disclaimer requirements on such communications.” The District Court for the District of Columbia denied Citizens United's preliminary injunction motion to enjoin the Federal Election Commission ("FEC") from enforcing these provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics