In the Seven Guidelines for Civil Disobedience, Howard Zinn presents civil disobedience as an act of deliberately violating a law for a societal purpose (Zinn 1). Therefore, civil disobedience is completely justified when society is threatened by a regime that practices absolute sovereignty. It is justified because absolute sovereignty only serves the interests of the state, not ours. Zinn perfectly uncovers the agenda of absolute sovereignty by stating: “We must never forget that we and the state are separate in our interest, and we must not be lured into forgetting this by the agents of the state. The state seeks power and wealth…[while] the individual seeks, health, peace, creative activity, and love” (Zinn 2). Consequently, absolute sovereignty…
Of course how John Gilbert viewed this flattering reward by the NSW government is unknown suffice to say his good natured character and quick wit and theatrical disposition would cause him much merriment and would make him one of the most intriguing of the gang who were to take the western and southern districts of NSW by storm. John Gilbert as such however, and unlike his compatriot Ben Hall who’s foray into lawlessness could be derived from a number of self-perceived and self-inflicted brushes with the police, particularly Sir Frederick Pottinger, a merciless enforcer of the law and one officer whose suspicions of Hall’s fraternization with the lawless element including Gardiner and Gilbert had much foundation, whereas Gilbert from his early…
In The Case Against Civil Disobedience the unknown author claims in his very first sentence that “the most striking characteristic of civil disobedience is its irrelevance to the problems of today” and that it is “the resort… exercised because the subject cannot or will not take up the rights and duties of the citizen.” What he fails to realize is that the rights and duties of a citizen is to keep an eye on the laws that rule the land and to revolt when those laws become unjust. It’s all part and parcel to the social contract thought up by Locke and heavily leaned upon by Thomas Jefferson. As Henry David Thoreau says in Civil Disobedience, “a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscious.” Civil disobedience can never become irrelevant because corruption will forever attempt to corrode even the best intentions of a government and so there will always be a need to revolt when unjust laws get pasted.…
Pollock, I interviewed Sharon Reeder. When the Vietnam War began, Mrs. Reeder was nine years old. She was too young to really understand what was happening with the war, so she didn’t have any feelings towards it at the beginning. One of her family friends, Donny Cook, fought in the war, but none of her family members took part in the war. When asked what she remembered from seeing on tv, Mrs. Reeder supplied a bunch of information. She remembered footage of the Vietnamese citizens/children getting killed, and the usage of agent orange, which harmed a lot of the US soldiers, and had many deadly after effects. The news also covered the protests going on, but Mrs. Reeder did not happen to know anyone personally who had been protesting. Because the news of the war was so new, teachers did not talk really talk about it in school. Sometimes it was brought up in history class, but there were not any huge lectures on it. Towards the end of the interview, Mrs. Reeder was also asked questions about the more political side of the Vietnam War. She was uncertain on how she felt towards the war. There were some points that made America’s involvement in war seem okay, and other points that made it seem foolish that America would even consider taking part in the war. Mrs. Reeder didn’t particularly agree with the idea of drafting, as she called it a “necessary evil”, but she knew that if it wasn’t for the draft, they wouldn’t have had anyone to fight in the war. When asked…
There are many misconceptions about the anti-war movement, one being that it was the reason the Vietnam war ended. On the contrary, the movement was more social and cultural than it was political. As a single organization it had little impact, but as a whole movement, it was able to influence on a broader level the politics in America. Even the Johnson and Nixon administration insisted they would ignore the anti-war efforts yet still, they adapted their policies to those who dissented.(456) Those in opposition to the anti-war wave tried with great effort to discredit the movement.…
A 21-year-old man by the name of Tom O’Brien was drafted into the American War in Vietnam merely one month after graduating from college. Tom speaks of his journey of living with the shame of events that took place the summer of 1968. War to Tom is sickening and revolting; there was no unity or purpose. The 1960’s were a period of social disturbance with both the feminist and the civil rights movements occurring. In addition, the United States’ was divided by those who agreed and those who did not agree with the US’s involvement in the Vietnam war. When he received his inauguration, Tom was trapped and felt hopeless. “All around me the options seemed to be narrowing, as if I were hurtling down a huge black funnel, the whole world squeezing in tight. There was no…
David Henry Thoreau, through his writings, influenced the Martin Luther King, Jr. in his quest for equal rights. Not only is this evidenced in King’s actions, but King partially attributes his methods to the inspiration of Thoreau. In “Civil Disobedience,” Thoreau promotes resisting unjust government actions. Although not opposed to violent solutions, Thoreau encourages less aggressive measures. Specifically, Thoreau gave the example of refusing to pay certain taxes. Following this idea, King writes in detail about nonviolent resistance in his first book, Stride Toward Freedom. King describes how one of Thoreau’s works was his original inspiration for his peaceful approach explaining, “. . . I read Thoreau’s Essay on Civil Disobedience for…
King believes that certain preparations should occur before one participates in direct civil disobedience, including attempting to first negotiate; “In ANY non-violent campaign there ARE four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine if whether injustice exist, negotiation, self-purification and direct action”. These steps serve as a framework for correctly practicing civil disobedience, failing to abide by this framework neglects the alternatives to creating civil unrest. Mindful of the importance of negotiation in constructively breaking the law, Socrates forms his MAIN argument off of the inability to control the ensuing chaos if he WE re to break the law after failing to negotiate. While personifying the law, Socrates speaks for…
All Through the Vietnam War, draft avoidance and resistance came to a peak, nearly crippling the Selective Service System. Joined with the rebellion inside the military and the greater civilian antiwar movement, draft resistance became yet another shackle on the government’s ability to wage a war in Vietnam, and brought the war home in a very personal way for a generation of young men. Many draft resisters filed for conscientious objector status, didn’t report for induction when called, or attempted to claim disability to preserve their rights while many others refused service to win the rights they were never given .…
Disobedience causes the right things to happen, it is like the key to good things, well sometimes. In past historical events, there was many issues involving disobedience; rebellions were a major impact of the happenings too. For example, Rosa Parks, she refused to give up her seat on the bus, so people started boycotting buses and due to that, blacks were able to get rights. Even though Rosa Parks had to serve jail time, she was the main cause of those rights today. Rosa Parks was not the only person who did something like this and served jail time as well, Martin Luther King Jr. He fought for equality, rebelled in order to accomplish what he started and believed in. For the blacks and the whites to be one nation, to be mixed all together…
With World War II not being over long, and already being back at war with the Soviet Union, America’s involvement with the Vietnam War became a highly controversial topic. The draft system was being used again and it had a good portion of America’s population on edge. However, the fear of communism and its possible spread to other places kept Americans willing to fight during both the Cold War and the Vietnam War. America’s involvement in the Vietnam War spanned six presidencies. The average age of a solider that left to fight in Vietnam whether they were drafted or volunteers was between 19 and 21. The United States involvement brought up many important questions, “such as should they stay out of other countries business?” “Should the draft…
“Civil disobedience is a form of protest in which protesters deliberately violate a law” (suber). It is a way for society to reform itself to reflect its current values while maintaining its fundamental ideals. Some may argue civil disobedience is a “slippery slope” leading to anarchy or it cannot be justified in a democracy. Civil disobedience, while not optimum, is a way to accomplish change with the intent of reform and stabilizing communities.…
Civil disobedience is a vital and necessary part of life in a democratic system of government. It serves to keep the government from overstepping its bounds. There are times in the history of countries where the governing body has become complacent and has begun to violate the rights of their citizens. Civil disobedience is an effective way of discouraging and preventing such transgressions. Without the threat of dissidence from the public, there is nothing to keep governments honest except for the honor of those governments, which is highly questionable even in the noblest of nations. The role of elected officials in the United States is to represent their constituents, be they from their district, state, or party. If there is nothing to hold these politicians to this purpose, can we truly be sure they are ruling in a representative way and not in self interest?…
In 1849, Henry David Thoreau disgusted by slavery and the injustices of the Mexican-American War wrote “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience”, where he states that civil disobedience is the deliberate defiance of a law to in order to change government policy or enact social reform. Civil disobedience was a major proponent in the women’s suffrage movement, Mohandas Gandhi’s campaign for independence in India, the civil rights movement in the USA, and the abolition of apartheid in South Africa. However there is a school of thought that sees civil disobedience as a major problem due to it seemingly advocating disorder. In most cases peaceful resistance to certain laws can have a positive impact. Civil disobedience has been the platform in which…
Henry David Thoreau was arrested for his refusal to pay a state tax in support of the Mexican-American War. He was opposed to the war because it was intended to expand the slave states. Thoreau not only engaged in civil disobedience, but in his essay “Civil Disobedience”…