Preview

Civil Justice System

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2219 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Justice System
University of London
Common law reasoning and institution

Essay title: ‘This is the Court of Chancery… which gives to monied might the means abundantly of wearying out the right; which so exhausts finances, patience, courage, hope; so overthrows the brain and breaks the heart; that there is no tan honorable man among its practitioners who would not give – who does not often give – the warning, “Suffer any wrong that can be done you, rather than come here”.’ (Charles Dickens, Bleak House, 1853, Penguin Classics 1971: 51)
To what extent, if any, does this warning hold true today in the civil justice process?

The civil justice system is designed to sort out disputes between individuals or organizations. One party, known as the claimant, sues the other, called defendant, usually for money they claim is owed or for compensation for a harm to their interests, like for example the victim of a car accident suing the driver of the car for compensation. But, however, filing a law suit or claiming damages has not been as easy as it theoretically seems, especially in the field of civil justice.
It can be easily observed from the history of English Civil Justice System how things used to and still work. It cannot be better explained in the following:
‘Jarndyce v Jarndyce drones on. This scarecrow of a suit has, in the course of time, become so complicated that no man alive knows what it means. The parties to it understand it least;….. Innumerable children have been born into the cause; innumerable young people have married into it; innumerable old people have died out of it….there are not three Jarndyces left upon the earth perhaps, since old Tom Jarndyce in despair blew his brains out at a coffee house in Chancery Lane; but Jarndyce v Jarndyce still drags its dreary length before the Court, perennially hopeless [Bleak House, 1853, Charles Dickens]. Holdsworth1 makes much of the fact that Dickens’s novel opens in physical fog and this fog is indicative of the



Bibliography: * 1: ibid,85 Geary, Adam, Morrison, Wayne and Jago, Robert “politics of the common law” pg 292 (2009) (book) * 2: Trade, ibid, 87 Geary, Adam, Morrison, Wayne and Jago, Robert “Politics Of the Common Law” pg 292 (2009) (book) * Slapper, Gary and Kelly, David “The English Legal System” 10th edt (book) * Civil Justice Quarterly 20 oct 2001 301-302,[ Westlaw UK] * judging civil justice system, Michael Zander qc ( Study Pack UoL) * Civil Justice System, Michael Zander, [Westlaw UK] * Solving Civil Justice System: what might be best?, Professor Genn, dame hazel [Westlaw UK] * Civil Litigation Reforms, 1999, LCD, p1

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Etma01

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Houston [1996] S.C.L.R. 943 Reading 3, W150 An Introductory to law in contemporary Scotland, Milton Keynes, The open University.…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The conditional fee arrangement was introduced by the Access to Justice Act (AJA) 1999, as an attempt to transfer legal funding from the treasury to the private sector. This occurred as a result of an increasing and ridiculous growth in the cost of legal aid, namely from a few hundred million to well over 2.1 billion pounds from the 1980s to 2000. Moreover, it was not because demand was growing. Rather, number of cases relying on legal aid had decreased. Due to the need to control budget, Conditional fee arrangements are used to fund many civil cases which legal aid now excludes, and the issues brought about by conditional fee arrangements have been debated over the last decade. The conditional fee arrangements are sometime known as ‘no win, no fee’ agreements, which are not used for family or criminal matters, but can be used in many types of civil action. The no win no fee concept was first introduced in the UK under the Solicitors Conditional Fee Agreements act in 1995. The primary reason for the no win no fee system was to make sure that individuals who did not qualify for legal aid could still make personal injury claims, regardless of their personal situation. Section 58 of the Courts and legal Services Act (CLSA) 1990 permitted the Lord Chancellor to introduce conditional fee arrangements. By 2000 legal aid was actually abolished for personal injury claims, resulting in the no win no fee personal injury claim system being the normal system that most claims work under. The beauty of the policy is that if you do not win your case, you are not required to pay any sort of fees to your no win no fee solicitor. Instead, the insurance will cover any costs and expenses of all parties involved, including your no win no fee lawyer. This allows you the safety and security of knowing that even if you are someone who is financially struggling, you still have the right to make a claim, and you will not have to pay if you for some reason lose your case. If you happen to…

    • 2700 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Common Law Dbq

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Equity was developed over centuries but initially as a reaction to the “harshness of the common law or lack of developments in common law”. Furthermore, the common law system went unchanged for centuries and was a system were petitions were presented to the King for his grace in some complaint where “the usual royal answer was let him sue in common law”. In addition, complainants often complained about officials in respect of misconduct and unfairness.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PACE

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1972, the murder of Maxwell Confait came before the courts. Two were convicted of the crime. A report was taken out by Sir Henry Fisher into the inquiry of system failures within the conviction process. The main issue was that of the police investigative processes which were put to blame for the miscarriages of justice this case (Newburn, Williamson & Wright, 2007). The Fisher report raised questions between administrative inquires and the judicial system, however, the report was not just an inquiry about facts of the law, but also a plan for change within the law (McBarnet, 1978).…

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Robbins Collections School of Law University of California at Berkley. (n.d.). The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Retrieved from http://www.berkley.edu…

    • 1862 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many believed that ‘broad discretion produced arbitrary and capricious decisions and that racial and other invidious biases influenced officials’ (Tonry, 1999). Considering that many of those involved in the sentencing and releasing of prisoners are not subject to review, Tonry has a valid point. There is no set standard for indeterminate sentencing, so judges had fairly free reign as to sentences. And it seemed to some, that criminals of different races and classes were often given vastly different sentences for committing the same crime, otherwise known as sentencing disparity.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stand Your Ground

    • 2777 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Westervelt, Saundra; Humphrys, John (2001, June 1). Wrongly Convicted: Perspectives on Failed Justice (Critical Issues in Crime and Society). Retrieved From:…

    • 2777 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The basic division in the structure of criminal courts is between the lower criminal courts – the local courts, Children’s court and Coroner’s court – and the higher criminal courts – the District Court and the Supreme Court. In observing proceedings at the Local, District and Supreme Courts over a period of three days a number of aspects of the criminal justice system were made apparent. The administration, processes and practices of the criminal trial are extremely varied dependent upon the level of criminal court being observed. The distinctions between the workings of the two courts revealed a number of the differences between summary proceedings and trial upon indictment. The cases observed served to provide evidence for the “two tiers of justice” argument. Also the role of the judiciary was perceived as being particularly interesting especially the high level of discretion that they held in the Local Courts and even to an extent in the District Court primarily when there was no jury present.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In using these language devices, Dickens conveys his opinion about the judicial system in England. He assesses the situation and works to convince the reader that the traditions need to be…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Systems

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This paper is about a court case, different types of federal and state courts, and new technology used in court cases.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    legal system

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Can the small claims court impose equitable relief (non monetary relief such as an injunction or specific performance)?…

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defense Attorneys

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fradella, H. F., Neubaubauer, D.W. (2011). America’s court and the criminal justice system (10th Edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court system and the different types of courts it has, have been created to take on different responsibilities and authorities. Each court has specific cases it can hear as well as appellate court, which reviews lower court decisions. An example of one of those courts is small claims court. Small claims court has been created to settle disputes involving small sums of money usually below 5,000 dollars. The movement to establish small-claims courts typically began in the early 1960s, when justice of the peace courts were increasingly seen as obsolete, and officials felt it desirable to have such a court to allow people to represent themselves without legal counsel. The basic reason for small claims court is to provide an inexpensive, fast and easy way for consumers to resolve disputes without the need to employ a solicitor. This is just one of the many courts that create the court justice…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays