2. Before this case took place, there had recently been many cases and laws that had been implemented regarding racial segregation and discrimination. In 1964, The Civil Rights Act passed which forbids racial discrimination in any program or activity receiving federal funding ((2)"Regents of the University of California v. Bakke."). The main law that was put into question and was used in the persecutor’s argument was the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. Bakke believed that his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment were being violated by UC Davis’s admission program.…
The Heart of Atlanta Motel, which discriminated in leasing its rooms on the premise of race, wanted a review of a judgment by attacking the lawfulness of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Heart of Atlanta Motel fought that in enacting the statue Congress surpassed its power to regulate commerce under the Commerce Clause, violating their Fifth and Thirteenth Amendments. “The Supreme Court decision was unanimous.” The Court supported the law. Justice Tom Clark was the justice who wrote for the Court. He pointed attention to that the Court had long supported Congress’s power to regulate interstate Commerce under the Commerce Clause. One of the cases referred to was Gibbons v. Ogden, decided in 1824. Starting with the 1930’s New Deal, Congress…
In constructive discharge an employee resigns when they have been subjected to unlawful discrimination. The employee in this case was employed before the change in policy in shift work. Before the policy change, the production shifts were Monday to Friday. With the new policy the production team works a rotating shift schedule where at times the schedule rotates to work on Saturday and Sunday. The policy then discriminates against this employee because he is required to work on a religious holy day. The other issue at hand is that there are positions with the office staff that continue to work Monday to Friday. The production staff is being singled out to change their shift work when others still maintain the Monday to Friday schedule. This is intolerable to the employee since they do have the right to not be discriminated on basis of religion. Not everyone in the company has had their schedule changed and due to the change the employee left the company right after the change in policy.…
An African-American teenager boy named Emmett Till decided to visit his family in Money, Mississippi. One day Emmett, his cousins, and friend were outside of a country store. He told his friend and cousins that he walk his white girlfriend home back in Chicago. His companions didn’t believe him, so they made him go to ask the white cashier for a date. Emmett went inside the store to buy a candy. At the way at the door Emmett told the white cashier “bye baby” then he left the store. The white cashier’s husband Bryant and her brother Milan went to see Emmett’s great uncle “Mose Wright” in the morning. After a few hour the two white men beat Emmett nearly to the death. They pulled out his eyes, and shot him. They…
In this discussion, I am going to discuss the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the influence this act has on healthcare today. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a Federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based on their race, color or national origin in programs and activities that receive Federal financial assistance (United States Department of Justice, 2014). As explained by Keers (2013), institutions or programs that may receive federal assistance include hospitals, Medicaid and Medicare agencies, alcohol and drug treatment centers, nursing homes and public assistance programs (p. 557).…
The Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1991 were both put into place to protect the rights of individuals who are subjected to unfair treatment. The protection granted by these laws were from the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. This particular law was considered a great achievement by legislature in regards to civil rights, however, individuals were still being retaliated against for initiating a law suits, thus the Civil Right Act of 1991 had to be implemented. The termination of the employees, which all happen to be African-American and over the age of 40 years old, may be interpreted by those employees as discrimination.…
In assessing the important role of Lyndon Baines Johnson in the battle for civil rights, the opinions of scholars and politicians differ enormously. Among his advocates he is viewed as “the foremost practitioner of civil rights to ever occupy the White House.” (“Civil Rights 116) Their appraisal is reasonably based on the legislative victories accomplished during his five-year presidency. His opponents on the other hand tend to question…
The Civil Rights Act of 1960 was not very effective in increasing equality for African Americans. It didn't provide African Americans with safe voting rights. The Act was weak and didn't help much with making voting equal for African Americans. Some states still protested the law because they thought it violated the states rights. Because the Act didn't help get more African Americans the chance to vote acts of violence increased. The act only helped increase voter registration by 3 percent. The Act didn't start any new laws for minority voters. The Civil Rights Act of 1960 did not get rid of poll…
The period 1945 to 1964 was where African Americans campaigned for their civil rights, and they aimed to improve the lives of black people, to some extent the federal government was involved in the improvement of the stays of black people including the presidents, the congress, the supreme courts and the FBI. However it was not the federal government alone who improved the status of black people because civil right campaigns such as the NAACP.…
When faced with pointing out the cons of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, one may feel there aren’t many if any. Or maybe that it’s a justified contradiction to the first amendment, which from the U.S. Constitution reads: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The 1964 Civil Rights act is just one of the many problems that arise from the civil rights act. When the Civil Rights Act was passed it permitted voting rights, injunctive relief against discrimination in public places, of public accommodation, desegregation in public places and public education, non discrimination in federally assisted programs, equal employment opportunity, and prohibited DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN. After reviewing it is apparent that the 1964 Civil Right act takes away an individual’s rights while attempting to apply new ones. The United States was built on freedom; the Civil Rights act prohibits one with opposite beliefs to act freely. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 gave the federal government unprecedented power over the hiring, employee relations, and customer service practices of every business in the country. The result was a massive violation of the rights of private property and contract, which are the bedrocks of free society. The federal government has no legitimate authority to infringe on the rights of private property owners to use their property as they please and to form (or not form) contracts with terms mutually agreeable to all parties. The rights of all private property owners, even those whose actions decent people find (abarent)abhorrent, must be respected if we are to maintain a free society. The Civil Rights act intensified segregation verses tearing down racial…
The modern civil rights movement has been affected by three very important Supreme Court cases. The first infamous case was the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision which dreadfully took away the rights of African Americans. Then the case of Plessy v. Ferguson was held in 1896 which had a major impact on the civil rights movement. This case decided that African Americans were “separate but equal”. Then finally the last infamous case was the Board v. the Board of Education which overruled the case of Plessy v. Ferguson. These cases made a huge dent on the civil rights movement and the equality laws we have instilled today.…
Simran Mistry 4/5/17 Reading response: Describe the successes of the Civil Rights movement from 1963-1965. Select one success and justify why it is the most significant victory for Black activists. The successes of the Civil Rights movement from 1963-1965 can be seen through the demonstrations in downtown Birmingham, the march on Washington, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The most significant success in this time period out of these three is most likely the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because it was done by the president immediately after he entered office…
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was one of the most extreme controversies in American history. Besides from being an important step to equality, it was also a glimmering beacon of hope for all of those who were victims of discrimination. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed on July 2, 1964 and was signed into law by President Johnson. The Civil Rights Act was first written in 1962 before President Kennedy's assassination.…
The 1960s saw unrest, antiwar dissents, and a social revolution. African American youth challenged taking after triumphs in the courts in regards to social liberties with road dissents driven by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and additionally the NAACP. Dr. King skillfully utilized the media to record examples of ruthlessness against peaceful African American dissidents to pull at the still, small voice of people in general. Activism took on effective political change when there were large gatherings that resulted in the mistreatment of the protestors. African Americans or women's activists or gay people, who felt the bite of appalling political strategies, and decided to direct long-range crusades of coming together to focus their challenge with the media.…
The Civil Rights Movement of the 20th century was a transformative period in history of America. Through methods of nonviolent protest, leaders like Martin Luther King, Jr. worked to challenge the segregation and discrimination facing African Americans. Through the success of the Civil Rights Movement, victories and advances in political, social, and economic equality have been made for not only African Americans, but also women, Asian Americans, and other minority groups in American society.…