Preview

Civil Strife in England: The Ambition of Richard of York and the Incompetence of Henry VI

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3134 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Strife in England: The Ambition of Richard of York and the Incompetence of Henry VI
How Far was the ambition of Richard of York the key cause to the civil strife (unrest) in England between 1450 and 1461?
It can be argued that the civil strife in England during the years 1450-1461 was the consequence of Richard of York’s ambition to be king of England. Although this is an important cause to the civil strife’s occurrence it is however not the most significant or key cause to the civil strife as the personality, actions and incomptenance of Henry VI as king of England is the major reason to why the civil strife occurred as Henry can be seen as the centre and basis of the all the factors that could arguably of caused the civil strife supported by Alison Weir: “at the centre of this bloody faction fight was the pathetic figure and the mentally unstable Henry VI whose ineptitude in government and mental incapacity gave rise to political instability, public discontent and dissensions between the great landed magnates that in turn led ultimately to war and a bitter battle over the throne itself” in her account of the civil strife, Lancaster and York: the wars of the roses in 1995.
Despite Henry VI feuding and escalating Richard of York’s ambitions to be king, York still played a key role in the cause of the civil strife. York’s personal ambition to be a part of the king’s council was stimulated from his desire to be a significant figure in England and to be recognised as a great leader; not only this but that he was indeed a magnate of the royal blood and as a rightful heir he ultimately believed he should be on the king’s council. This highlights Richard of York’s ambitions from the outset of Henrys reign. However York’s expectations of a prominent position in the counsels was soon overseen as Henry dismissed York; appearing not to accept and acknowledge his birth right. Therefore it is clear York was ambitious yet all he originally wanted was to be given the place in the King’s Counsel he was entitled to not to be king and usurp the throne. Henrys

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Edward IV died in 1483, a dispute began between to major factions – the Woodvilles and Richard of Gloucester. The Woodvilles were the family of Elizabeth Woodville, Edward’s wife, with whom he shared many children. Edward V, the heir to the throne, was the son of Elizabeth Woodville, and so this put them in a good position. However, Richard of Gloucester was Edward’s brother and had shown himself to be a very useful and successful man to Edward during his reign. They both had their various strengths and weaknesses, and they both wanted the same thing. Control of England.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Edward VI died in 1483, there was debate as to who was most suited to take up his position on the throne. It has been argued that Richard, Duke of Gloucester had himself set on usurping the throne from the rightful heir Edward V, as soon as his brother died. Others argue that it was never the case that his immediate wishes were to seize the throne; actions after his brother’s death led him to this decision. There is evidence for and against to support the principal statement.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How successful was Henry VII in dealing with challenges to his royal authority in the years 1489 to 1499?…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far did Richard III demonstrate the capacity to be a good king 1483-1485? (24 Marks)…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legitimacy is the key to a successful kingship. If you can be perceived as an effective and legitimate ruler by the nobility, you will remain in power. This was especially important in the early period of the reign of Edward IV because the son of Henry VI, Edward of Westminster, was still alive until he was killed at the Battle of Tewkesbury on 4th May 1471. If Edward IV not establish the legitimacy in the minds of the nobles, then they could easily justify overthrowing the usurper because the son of the rightful king, Edward of Westminster, was still alive. Our extract shows us this attempt to legitimise Edward IV by delegitimising the overthrow of Richard II by saying that Henry IV took the throne through illegal…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lucille Laydon- In what ways was dynastic marriage important in Henry VII’S relations with foreign power in the years 1487-1509? (12 Mark)…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the battle of Bosworth field, Richard seems to have had a larger number of fighting men than Tudor and also held the higher ground, however many contemporaries stated that the battle was largely a stalemate, suggesting that Tudor’s preparations for battle had been successful, at least for the fact that he was able to hold his own against an opponent with greater numbers and a more preferable geographical position. It was not until Richard’s fateful “suicide charge”; a charge with the aim of directly attacking the oppositions leader, rather than being explicitly suicidal. Thanks to the Swiss-trained French mercenaries in Henry’s garrison and their tactics never before seen on English soil and Thomas, Lord Stanley’s last minute decision to support Henry, Richard was killed and Tudor took his crown. Thus Henry’s success in replacing Richard of York as king of England, would not be as we know it had Richard not made the dramatic charge that resulted in his death, but whether the success would ever have occurred is still yet to be explored.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The removal of dynastic threats and the stability of the monarch was the key cause to the decrease in rebellions. Before hand there were numerous noble led dynastic threats, including Simnel in 1487 which was only a year after Henry VII had managed to secure the crown after the battle of Bosworth, and it contained much yorkist support a group which it can be argued that Henry should have dealt with sooner like Elizabeth did in destroying any potential threats as soon as she could. Simnel was passed off as Earl of Warwick who was rumoured to have died, he managed to get the support of 2000 mercenaries sent by Margaret of Burgundy and the rising became a real challenge and although Henry was eventually successful it did…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1470 Edward IV’s rule was challenged by the former monarch that he had usurped, Henry VI, and one of the key reasons as to why he was able to overcome this challenge was due to his popularity as king. Edward had proved to be an able king who was also young, strong and handsome, which is severely juxtaposed to the monarch he had usurped, as Henry VI was old, a less than capable ruler and thought to be insane. This meant that not only his original usurpation of Henry in 1461 was considered more acceptable to England’s population as it was most likely going to better the country; it also meant that Henry’s usurpation of Edward in 1470 was especially unfavourable with the population. Another reason why Edward was able to overcome his challenge of usurpation was at that time France was very unpopular with England, which is unsurprising as it is said that ‘England’s national hobby was going to war with France’, and Henry VI’s wife, Margaret of Anjou was the French kings niece. This marriage alone would be enough to make Edward appear more favourable with the general population; however it seemed likely that if Edward had not usurped, an alliance between the two countries would proceed, which only served to support Edward’s campaign to get back on the throne. Nonetheless, the most damaging factor to the position of the opposition is most likely the circumstances that the Lancastrian house found themselves in as with the deaths of both their key supporter, the Earl of Warwick, at the Battle of Barnet and of the Lancastrian heir, Edward, Prince of Wales at Tewkesbury, the Lancastrian position was no longer considered viable. The popularity of Edward IV was not repeated with Richard III however, and this combined with the fact he usurped a king that was showing great…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is clear that many of the origins of this 'crisis' have their roots in the reign of Henry VIII. He left a very difficult legacy to his successors, but it must be remembered that Somerset provoked the problems already in existence and Northumberland and Mary I then had the difficult task of resolving them. Henry VIII was only one contributing factor to the crisis.…

    • 1997 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the rule of Henry VI, certain nobles had increasing amounts of power, which angered some of the other nobles who felt they were being ignored. It is certain that they had too much power at the time, and that this was a contributing cause for the outbreak of the conflicts, however it was catalysed by things like bastard feudalism These sources show various views linked to the statement that “the problem of an over-mighty nobility was the main cause of the outbreak of the wars of the roses”. In this essay, I will put the sources in context using my own knowledge and see how far they support or disagree the statement, and to what extent it is true.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A deeper understanding of ambition and identity emerges from pursuing the connections between King Richard III and Looking for Richard.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tudor dynasty experienced differing uncertainties throughout their reigns on the throne of England. From politics and war overseas, to succession difficulties. Each Monarch throughout early modern England faced conflicting challenges and hardships, nevertheless Henry VIII stands out among them all. Henry’s turbulent years on the throne presents an evolution throughout English society, culture, religion and politics, to name a few. Henry was not expected to become King, being only the third child of Henry VII, himself also an unexpected King, winning his throne on the battle field against Richard III in 1485. His early youth was not that of the first in line to the throne, due to the unexpected death of this elder brother Arthur, Henry…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Level

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There were three main rebellions in Henry VIII’s reign as king; The Lincolnshire Rising, The Pilgrimage of Grace and Cumberland Rebellion. These rebellions were all connected because each one triggered off the next one. The three main factors that set off the rebellions were the economic state of the country, the political state and the religious activities at the time.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays