Compare how these texts explore ambition and identity.
Ambition; an earnest desire for some type of achievement or distinction, as power, honour, fame, or wealth, and the willingness to strive for its attainment * Al Pacino’s production as an art-house vanity project * Promotes himself – manipulating the audience through cutaways, specific and timed edits. The medium of film allows for one to manipulate and force audience attention to a specific area, scene. * His honest ‘love’ for William Shakespeare
* Richard III – Ambition for power and the crown (Buckingham, Richard, Richmond) * Tudor Myth displayed * Strive for power
Identity: * Through the collective works and connections established one forms an opinion on identities and how actions shape and define a person and their identity. * Pacino may be displayed as a egocentric, Hollywood star fulfilling his own purpose of promoting himself unto the world. This profile also creates a heroic and insightful connotation to Pacino who comments to the audience that his objective is to make Shakespeare more accessible to a modern day audience. * Identity and the role of identity in acting. Does Al Pacino become like Richard III? Can one divorce themselves from the character traits they are presenting? * Richard III – does conscience, acting and deception shape identity? Is Richard merely a creation of God’s divine will, or is he a cold hearted villain? * Nature V Nurture * Was Richard born horrific or was it a skill he acquired? * Was it due to the deformities and possible prejudices he suffered “dogs bark at me as I pass” * Pacino evokes sympathy from the audience in the ending scenes opposing interpretations in the play and impacts of context ie. Divine Justice and Elizabethan claim to the