Clarence said “He didn’t think John did anything wrong by deciding to teach evolution to his biology students in school.
Clarence said “He didn’t think John did anything wrong by deciding to teach evolution to his biology students in school.
The allegations were contradicted by other people within the trial. The jury saw that there was not enough evidence supporting that it was a clear print mistake, and that it instead was a act of malice.…
Picture A. The scopes trial- A high school teacher by the name of John Thomas Scopes was charged and fined because he had started teaching his students of evolution theory. By teaching evolution theory, the idea that mankind had descended from apes and evolved throughout time, he was therefore denying the biblical stories of creationism. It doesn’t seem like a big deal at all except that at this time the Butlers Act was taking place which forbid exactly was Mr. scopes taught.…
Clarence was born into a family with different views than society making him a freethinker willing to fight the hard cases.…
Presiding as a juror in the case of City of Winesburg vs. George Willard, I present henceforth my written verdict. The City of Winesburg has charged the defendant, George Willard, as a grotesque living with an obsession of maturity. Having defined a grotesque as one who takes truth(s) and abides his entire life after them, Mr. Willard faced a serious allegation. Due to the defense’s witnesses providing evidence that aligned with the accusations leveled by the prosecution, I find the defendant guilty as charged.…
As we continue through Gideon’s Trumpet, Anthony Lewis continues to explain the complicated process that the Supreme Court takes in hearing a case. There are many instances in which Lewis shows how he is in favor of thick, procedural democracy. Lewis emphasizes the process of judicial review; the prejudice is the court system, the history of ones right to counsel, and how the court was changing at the time. Through these examples, Lewis shows how the Supreme Court is not a perfectly unbiased system; it is quite adequate in its process. However, as this book relates to American Creation, the time and place of the novel played a pivotal role in fate of Clarence Earl Gideon. Throughout this section of Gideon’s Trumpet, Lewis shows that the case of Gideon v. Cochran and later Gideon v. Wainwright was not as important as the time at which the case occurred.…
The Constitutional issue~ Robert appealed his conviction and argued that title 18 of the United States Code section 48 was unconstitutional because it violated his freedom of speech listed in the First Amendment. He also thought that he was innocent because title 18 of the U.S.C section 48 was mostly about animal “crushers”…
While many view the Scope’s Trial as merely a debate between creationists and evolutionists, it is far more complex than that. It has helped to reinforce stereotypes of both sides, shape how man is viewed, and led to a number of alterations in social and educational spheres. After the Butler Act was passed, the UCLA attempted to recruit teachers to take it to court in the hopes they would finally get their big break. A few citizens in Dayton Tennessee saw an advertisement in a newspaper and decided it would be a good way to gain some publicity for the small town. They asked all of the local Biology teachers, but could not find anyone willing to go to court. Then, they found John Scopes. John Scopes was a football coach who taught general science, who just happened to have filled in for a biology teacher for two weeks. They were able to convince him to go to court, and thus Dayton was put on the map.…
There were several people involved in the trial. They included John Scopes, William Jennings Bryan, and Clarence Darrow. They each played a very important role in the trial.…
He never gave up on his people, he wanted to show people that even though it was hard he worked and worked until his client prove non guilty. Darrow’s thoughts was to help inspire other lawyer to try their best to help clients gain their rightful innocence. He was considered a great and most powerful lawyer due to his belief in equality and education in law. Darrow’s speech was about “A Plea of Mercy” Darrow states “that young boys come to court charge with murder some safe and the others get set to their death. Young boys who are sent to war and learn to place a cheap value on humans life.”(Clarence Darrow A Plea of Mercy). His speech helped people realize that no matter if…
Religion was perhaps the biggest source of this tension in America. The most prominent of this conflict was that between fundamentalists, who interpreted the Bible literally, and modernists who were more readily willing to interpret the Bible more flexibly. The most notable of these conflicts was undoubtedly the Scopes Trial, in which high school biology teacher, John Scopes, was arrested for teaching the theory of evolution, rather than the bible. Document C shows Scope’s attorney, Clarence Darrow, skillfully cross-examining prosecutor and Bible expert, William Jennings Bryan. Darrow's cross-examination forced Bryan to explicitly state the incredible inflexibility and rigidity of fundamentalist beliefs. As a result of the trial, which was broadcast across the nation via radio and newspaper, many Americans were more readily willing to consider modernist religious interpretations. Another example of this fundamentalist idea was the WCTU's arguments against smoking, which is shown in Document G. Although the content of their message is unsurprising, the fact that the religious organization relied upon scientific evidence for its appeal represents the growing respect for science, even in religious circles. Other conflicts, however, also arose within religion. Aimee Semple Macpherson was simultaneously revered and criticized for her superficial, glamorous religious services, as detailed in part by Document I. Predictably, conservative religious groups condemned her non-traditional…
of Education. The case ended up making it all the way to the supreme court where…
Jesse L. Jackson Jr., a former U.S. Representative. He represented Illinois ' 2nd congressional district. He is the son of activist and former presidential candidate Jesse Jackson Sr. Elected to Congress in 1995 at the age of 30 from a district that includes a part of the South Side of Chicago, Mr. Jackson was one of the most prominent young black politicians in the country. He is most remembered for working on issues related to health care and education for the poor. Jackson and his wife, Sandra Stevens Jackson, pled guilty on Wednesday in a scheme to use $750,000 in campaign cash for personal use. In January 2006, Jackson personally opened a bank account under the name Jesse Jackson Jr. for Congress, according to the Chicago Tribune, Federal authorities allege that Jackson Jr. used campaign funds to purchase a $43,350 men’s gold-plated Rolex watch, $5,150 worth of fur capes and parkas, and $9,588 in children’s furniture. The purchases were made between 2007 and 2009, according to the criminal information, which authorities noted is not evidence of guilt.…
What makes this case standout is that it is such a high profile investigation, where Judicial Rhetoric is in used. Since it is fairly recent event not a ton of research has been done on this topic; which is partly why I chose it. Along with the fact that I’m generally curious about rhetoric used by lawyers.…
In July of 1925, John Thomas Scopes was put on trial in Tennessee for violating the Butler Act, which was a state law that prohibited evolution to be taught in state-funded schools. By using texts from famous scientists like Charles Darwin and new sources of literature from “Modernists,” which were people who claimed that evolution could be consistent with the bible, Scopes taught his students the theory of evolution. Due to the theory “challenging Christian faith,” Scopes was quickly dismissed from his teaching position, put on trial in Dayton, Tennessee, and fined $100. Even though Scopes was embarrassed and disheartened, he disagreed with the state’s ruling and had the verdict overturned due to the technicality that claimed it was not “science,” but it was part of a philosophical discussion. A few years after the incident, an Englishman named…
The Scopes Trial of 1925 was not simply a case to be tried, but a war to be fought on many fronts, set against the back drop of the hottest summer Dayton Tennessee had ever experienced. Along with the extraordinary temperature came the heat of passion emanating from those people involved in the trial. From the science to the theology, the fundamentalist’s folks to the flourishing flappers, and the suited lawyers to the appareled primates, everyone was prepared for battle, with the American public eagerly awaiting the outcome. While the moral implications concerning the roles of women that many traditionalists believed would follow an innocent verdict were significant to the trials progression, as were the likely subsequent academic affects…