Cloning Argumentative Analysis

Making a replica of an organism, sperm, egg, or anything else sounds pretty crazy. There will be those that will think cloning can be a great idea. The thing is that taxpayers will have to pay a certain amount of money to the government to fund therapeutic and reproductive cloning. However, any type of cloning should not be accepted. Many people believe that cloning can be beneficial, but it won’t be beneficial because humankind can actually handle life without making a replica. Some people would actually come to the point where they will take part of their bodies for granted, or another reason is that there will be those who won’t get the chance to experience life the natural way.
Somehow people have survived life without the people or things that they thought they couldn’t live without. Veterans or people who have cancer can be an example as to those who have survived life. Veterans have either lost a limb or perhaps needed an organ. Some veterans are still living with an organism they lost or possibly didn’t make it. Those who are for
Reproductive cloning on the other hand won’t be good as well. In the article's reproductive cloning arguments pro and con it is mentioned that “Reproductive cloning would diminish the uniqueness of an individual.” Reproducing a child is the most beautiful moment you can experience. Mostly because your partner (that you love) and you have created a human being that won’t look similar to any other person. Cloning yourself to have a “child” will ruin the perspective of bearing or raising an actual kid. Having a clone as your “child” wouldn’t be a great idea. Hhaving a kid is a major difference than having a kid that looks exactly like you in every way. Those who can’t bear children because of multiple reasons have the opportunity to adopt a child. Why want more when you can get a kid without going through so much