Preview

Coca Cola's Water Neutrality Initiative

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1088 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Coca Cola's Water Neutrality Initiative
Coca-Cola’s Water Neutrality Initiative 1. The public issue that the Coca-Cola Company was facing is this case was its impact on its water use in local communities. The company was depleting local water reserves and introducing dangerous levels of pesticides in its products in and around its global plants. I feel that the nonmarket stakeholders were the ones most concerned by this public issue in the beginning. The global leaders (government) understood that the depletion of the world’s water resources could have a profound effect on the world in the near future. The water shortage also had an effect on the rise in food prices, regional conflicts, and disease. This in turn caused concern in another nonmarket group the general public. The general public are on the front lines in these circumstances, especially in third world countries where there is little corporate regulation and law. Because Coca-Cola is a World Wide conglomerate the global leaders and the general public expect the company to lead the way in terms of corporate social responsibility. I feel that in the beginning of this issue that Coca-Cola was primarily interested in facilitating the needs of their market shareholders. However once the global leaders and general public began to take notice they soon began to sway their views in terms of more efficient and effective methods to resolve their water issues to satisfy both the market shareholders and the nonmarket shareholders. 2. I feel that the geophysical environment and the political environment are the two strategic radar screens that stand out in this particular case. The physical environment affects the behavior and development of the people, both children and adults, who live and work in it. The quality of the physical space and materials provided affects the level of involvement of the children and the quality of interaction between adults and children. Coca-Cola definitely had disrupted the water resources of the local communities


Cited: Lawrence, A. T., & James, W. (2011). Business and Society . New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Cited: McAdams, Tony. Law, Business and Society. 9. VitalSource Bookshelf. McGraw-Hill Learning Solutions, 2009, Wednesday, December 14, 2011. <http://online.vitalsource.com/books/0077587596/id/ch17lev1sec13>…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bus 250 Week 4 Disc1

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lawrence, A., Weber, J. (2010). Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy. New York, NY. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    You Decide

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: McAdams, T., Neslund, N., & Zucker, K. D. (2012). Law, business, & society. (10 ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mickey Brawl

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Lawrence, A. T. & Weber, J. (2011). Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy (13th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Lawrence, Anne (2010). Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy. 13th Edition. McGraw-Hill Learning Solutions, 2010. VitalBook file. Bookshelf.…

    • 4314 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. All of the stages in the issue management process were applied in this case. Coca-Cola used the identify issue in order to identify the problem of using too much water, in which they then used the analyze issue to determine what plants are using too much water and where can they improve in their operations to make them more efficient. After analyzing the situation they then generated options on how to cut down on their water usage and how to give back to help the communities that they have taken water from. They then proceeded to take action joining in reducing usage, recycling and replenishing. Coca-Cola decided to take action by supporting and participating in various water conservation projects and would only discharge water from their plants…

    • 519 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this social marketing plan is to guide the development and implementation of a Southwest Florida Water Management District (the District) pilot intervention program to reduce residential irrigation water use in three target neighborhood areas in Sumter, Polk and Charlotte counties. Specifically, the plan provides strategies to encourage residents in these pilot neighborhoods to:…

    • 6470 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    bus 682 sfsu

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bibliography: Lawrence, A. T., & Weber, J. (2011). Business and society: stakeholders, ethics, public policy (13th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lawrence, A. T., & Weber, J. (2011). Business and society: Stakeholders, ethics, public policy (13th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Steiner G.A., Steiner, J.F., Collins, D.L. (12th ed.). (2009). Business, Government, Society, A managerial Perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lawrence, A. & Weber, J. (2011). Business and Society: Stakeholders, ethics and public policy. (13 ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coke and Pepsi Case Study

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Number 2 Priority: Both Coca-Cola and PepsiCo dealt with this crisis very poorly this first time. Instead of taking action and accepting the fact that they were in the wrong, they choose to deny the allegations of CSE and IRC through the media. They should have explained to their customers the problem, why it happened, what they were going to do to fix it, and keep their customers informed of the progress. They did not do these steps but rather, they conducted their own tests within their companies and came to the conclusion that their drinks met demanding European standards. The two companies also tried to play the blame game and explain that other companies in India had high levels of pesticides as well. This is not the correct way to go about the crisis, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. needed to take responsibility for their actions and explain to their…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coke & Pepsi in india

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Q1) Identify the issues that are going on in this case with respect to issues management, crisis management, global business ethics, and stakeholder management. Rank these in terms of their order of priorities for Coca-Cola and PepsiCo.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Vidding

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lawrence, A. T. & Weber, J. (2011). Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy (13th ed.). New York:…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Williams, 2002 Case Study

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cited: Coval, Joshua, Robin Greenwood, and Peter Tufano. "Williams, 2002." Harvard Business School Publishing (2002): 1-17. http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu. Web. 21 Jan. 2013.…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays