Preview

cola wars continue

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
395 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
cola wars continue
Cola wars continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 (HBS 9-711-462)
a. Use the 5-forces framework to explain why the soft drink concentrate industry has been so profitable.
The soft drink concentrate industry has been very profitable for over 100 years. The reason can easily be found by analyzing the concentrate industry using the 5-forces model.
According to the 5-forces model, each industry’s profitability can be assessed considering the five forces that influence the market – The rivalry among existing competitors, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of new entrants, and threat of substitute products or services. Considering the rivalry among existing competitors, the rivalry is very intense. Among national concentrate producers, Coke and Pepsi claimed a combined 72% of the U.S. CSD market’s sales volume. The Cola war has begun in 1950s and the competition is still ongoing. Also, the competitions in other sectors of drinks and between small concentrate producers were harsh.
Next, regarding the bargaining power of suppliers, it was relatively low. The concentrate producers blend caramel coloring, phosphoric or citric acid, natural flavours, and caffeine. Since they do not require many inputs, the suppliers of concentrate producers remain profitable.
The bargaining power of buyers – the bottlers - was relatively low. The main costs components of bottlers are concentrate and syrup. However, ever since the concentrate producers such as Coke and Pepsi built a nationwide franchised bottling network, the bottlers were put under their control. Also, after the 1987 Master Bottler Contract, the concentrate industry had the right to determine concentrate price and other terms of sale. As the concentrate companies of CSD expanded into different categories, the concentrate producers bottled some products on their own.
The threat of new entrants was also relatively low. Since Coke and Pepsi had extremely high market share, it was not easy for other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Coca-Cola and Pepsi have an agreement with their own bottler who specializes in this field. Moreover, the agreement restrains the bottlers to carry other brand. For instance, Coke bottler could not carry Royal Crown Cola.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) Franchise agreements between bottlers (buyers) and concentrate producers locked bottlers into exclusive deals and made switching costs high, compelling bottlers to accept pricing and promotion schema.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Coke & Pepsi have chosen to operate primarily on the production of soft drinks syrup,while leaving independent bottlers with more competitive segment of the industry.The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the possible strategies that can be applied, in order to expand the overall throat share in the future. History revealed that a highly competitive strategy that was utilized in the past by both companies resulted in cannibalization. Because of this, the report is described from the perspective of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi. This report focuses on increasing the overall share and finding new opportunities in the unrevealed markets.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coke and Pepsi are two big players in the market. The competition in the market has been such in which one company goes ahead with some new product and other company adopts a proactive approach and it comes up with something new that no one takes the advantage, Because of the customer base and the market share they affect the profit of the…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola War

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages

    For over a century, carbonated drink was introduced to mankind. Two major contenders in the industry stand Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. The two soar in the industry as they compete with each other. There were amazing monopolistic behaviors found in their doings. Have you ever wondered why such drink without any redeeming health benefits, but rather sublimely known as one of the causes to sugar and fat related diseases, can be so profitable? By setting the health benefits aside, have you ever wondered why such drinks are so popular yet a lot of competitors are unable to imitate and stand up to beat them? The secret lies…

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars Case

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Using Porter’s Five Forces analysis for the CPs industry, we determined that the Bargaining Power of Buyers was low. In 1987, Coke’s Master Bottler Contract granted Coke the right to determine the concentrate price based on a pricing formula that adjusted quarterly and stated a maximum price for the sweetener used in the production. Pepsi’s Master Bottling Agreement required that top bottler purchased its raw materials from Pepsi on terms and conditions determined by Pepsi. These agreements limited the opportunity for price negotiations between the buyers and the CPs.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Two of the major competing companies that manufacture drinks are Coca-Cola, and Pepsi. They both produce regular water, flavored water, and soft drinks of many kinds. While this essay will explain what vertical and horizontal analysis is, it will also explain each company’s vertical and horizontal analyses. Also the ratios for each company will be given, and several examples as to how each company can improve in their financial status. The financial analysis of both companies is very important so both businesses can understand how they are being managed.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ①There are two kinds of buyers, one is the bottler, and the other is the retailor. The power of bottler is huge cause they have large numbers of products, while the bargaining power of retailor can be different among the channels. Among the 7 channels, Super-markets and Fountain& Vending have more power, while Mass retailers and Drug stores have relative low power considering the low share.②The suppliers are numerous, such as caramel coloring, phosphoric or citric acid. Coke and Pepsi are mature companies, so the suppliers have little budgeting power. Sweeteners are suppliers to bottlers, and they have low power.…

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The existing players in the soft drink industry have much advantage relative to new entrants. First, supply-side economy discourages new entrants by forcing them to enter the market in large scale. CSD’s demand side benefits of scale also makes it difficult for new entrants to be accepted by the public. In 2002, a survey found that 37% of respondents chose a CSD because it is their favorite brand, while only 10% said so about bottled water. This demonstrates CSD customers’ high brand loyalty and their lack of desire to buy from new entrants. In terms of capital requirement, concentrate manufacturers only requires $25~$50 million to set up a plant that can serve the entire United States of America. Yet, new entrants may have difficulties competing with major players’ well-established brands and their large scale unrecoverable (therefore, hard to finance) spending on advertising. There is also unequal access to bottlers and retail channels for newcomers. Most bottlers are in long-term contracts with major CSD brands; also, the largest distribution channel, supermarkets, consider CSD a “big traffic draw”, thus provide little to no shelf space for newcomers. In addition, strong fear of retaliation from major players also makes newcomers hesitate to enter.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The retailers have a low to moderate buyer power over the consumer soft drink industry, due to the producer’s ability to forward integrate, the sheer number of buyers, and the buyer’s ability to forward integrate. Buyer power is the degree of influence customers have on the producing agent. Soft drink companies such as Coca Cola and Pepsi have used forward integration to take over their channels of distribution. They created contracts that gave them the ability to set concentrate prices for their bottlers; in turn bottlers would respond to price fulgurations by adjusting retail pricing. In 2000, when Coca Cola raised concentrate prices by 7.6%, bottlers raised the retail prices by 6 to 7%. This demonstrates that buyers have limited control over the price changes. Coca Cola has also made great efforts to take over the bottling of their product, by establishing the independent subsidiary Coca Cola Enterprises. They began by acquiring bottlers to produce one third of their volume during 1986 which increased to 80% in 2004. This gave Coca Cola more control over retail pricing, and distribution of their products to retail stores. Since there are so many retail stores that carry products that consumer soft drink, CSD, companies make, it is hard for buyers to create a collaborative effort to resist price increases.…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Demand for Coca-Cola supplier’s products is low because the ingredients used for soft drinks are commodities. In addition, materials such as cans and plastic bottles are also commodities that can be purchased from any chosen supplier because it has a low switching cost. Therefore, the bargaining power of suppliers is weak.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola War

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Concentrates are more profitable than bottling cola because concentrates are made by blending the raw ingredients together before it gets shipped to the bottler. On average a concentration plant can cost anywhere between $25-50 million and could serve the whole population of the United States. Also, with concentration plants, there is little capital investment spent on machinery, manufacturing, overhead and direct labor. Most of the concentration plants spend their money on building their trademarks and advertising. Concentration plants negotiate with the bottlers’ major suppliers to encourage a reliable supply of concentrates, faster deliveries and lower prices, which leads to…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Cola Wars

    • 2269 Words
    • 10 Pages

    There are two well known beverage companies, Coco-Cola and Pepsi. They have competed considerably and distributed the beverage market profit for several decades. In the open market, it is difficult to exactly tell which one is the winner within the perfect competition, since both companies use different style of promotion and product to expend their markets.…

    • 2269 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola War

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Already a mature market, coke & pepsi spent a lot of money, time & effort on all things e.g. networking, manufacturing…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Five Forces Model establishes five forces that create the degree of rivalry-industry concentration and switching costs etc- in a certain industry inother words determining the profitability of that industry. The four constitutes thatlead to rivalry are barriers to entry- absolute cost advantage and governmentpolicy etc, supplier power- supplier concentration and differentiation of inputs etc-, buyer power- brand identity and threat of backward differentiation etc-, andlastly threat of substitutes- buyer inclination to substitute etc.The CSD industry is a very profitable industry and has a large presence inglobal markets. However, there are several factors that make it very difficult for the competition to enter the market. For example, both Coke and PepsiCo havefranchise agreement with their existing bottler¶s who have rights in a certaingeographic area. These franchise agreements strictly prohibit the bottler fromtaking on business from new competing brands. Furthermore, if a concentrateproducer wanted to build their own bottling plants due to the inability to bottlefrom the existing bottling plants as prohibited by Coke and Pepsi; the newbottling plant would require an extensive capital expenditure on advertising,building brand image and loyal customers, and paying retailer for shelf space asPepsi and Coke pay retailers 15-20% for putting their beverages in the front of the shelves.Second of all, suppliers have no power as compared to the CSD industrybecause most of the ingredients needed to produce the concentrate are basiccommodities such as sugar, carbonated water, caffeine etc. Suppliers don¶t havemuch pricing power over these commodities therefore making the suppliers inthis industry weak.Third of all, the major channels for the CSD industry are supermarkets,convenience stores, vending machines and fast food fountain. The…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics