Preview

Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
504 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
Consider the CSD industry. Have Coke and Pepsi’s profits historically been high? Do you consider it surprising or not surprising given the product they produce?
In the CSD industry, the highest net profit-sales ratio of Coke and Pepsi are 21.1% and 14.3%, and the steadily growth is also surprising.so the profits are high. The content is water, Coke syrup, CO2, and additives, which cost about 10 cents per can, nearly next to nothing.
What are the primary barriers to entry and how important are they?
The barriers are high. They can be up-front advertising, R&D cost, bottling lines equipment, and brand awareness. Firstly, megabrands such as Coke and Pepsi already take about 60% market share, left fierce competition to the other brands. Secondly, On supply-side economies of scale, the megabrands such as Coke and Pepsi already take about 60% market share and the larger volumes of products to spread fixed cost over more units. Thirdly, on demand-side benefits of scale, the impact of brand reputation is huge, for customers are more willing to buy products of megabrands. Coke and Pepsi spent $244,000 and $140,000 on average each year in 2008 and 2009,which could be an unaffordable up-front cost for new entrant.
Who are Coke and Pepsi’s buyers and suppliers? How much power does each have?
①There are two kinds of buyers, one is the bottler, and the other is the retailor. The power of bottler is huge cause they have large numbers of products, while the bargaining power of retailor can be different among the channels. Among the 7 channels, Super-markets and Fountain& Vending have more power, while Mass retailers and Drug stores have relative low power considering the low share.②The suppliers are numerous, such as caramel coloring, phosphoric or citric acid. Coke and Pepsi are mature companies, so the suppliers have little budgeting power. Sweeteners are suppliers to bottlers, and they have low power.
How large is the threat of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    The income statement of PepsiCo’s COS to sales percentage slightly rose from 43.31% in year 2004. Coca-Cola’s five-year average COS to sales percentage was only 35.26%, much lower than PepsiCo. Coca Cola was able to achieve a higher gross profit margin with lower COS to sales percentage. PepsiCo is the consequence of its tougher pricing…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By reducing the threat of backward integration and substitute inputs, and by implementing favorable contracts, concentrate producers exercised control over buyers and increased profits.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Coca-Cola Company has been serving their product since May 8, 1886. They have over 3,500 products worldwide with a large range of options. Products range from water and orange juice to the soda drinks that made the company (“Coca-Cola Journey,” 2014). Out of the top 20 brands, 19 of them have low or no calorie options, or they are low or no calorie. Coca-Cola has approximately 250 bottling partners and nearly 900 plants worldwide. They have over 24 million retail customer outlets, which means they reach a lot of people. Coca-Cola is willing to invest in their company. They have invested over $50 billion in new facilities and distribution infrastructures, equipment, and retail…

    • 3012 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coke and Pepsi

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Coca-Cola has been more efficient than Pepsi in producing a greater net income in two out of…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coke and Pepsi are two big players in the market. The competition in the market has been such in which one company goes ahead with some new product and other company adopts a proactive approach and it comes up with something new that no one takes the advantage, Because of the customer base and the market share they affect the profit of the…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | A large amount of customers are key to ensuring that Coco-Cola have high profits. This means that Coca-Cola will want to make sure their products are of a good quality to ensure business in future. Coca –Cola will want to ensure customers choose them over their nearest rival for example, Pepsi. So they would try to stand out from other rivals.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Industry Analysis Csd

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The industry of Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSD) is highly concentrated. The three major companies, Coca Cola, PepsiCo, and Cadbury Schweppes accounted in 1998 for more than 90% of market share by case volume –Exhibit 1-.…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coke and Pepsi Case Study

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1. Identify the ongoing issues in this case with respect to issues management, crisis management, global business ethics, and stakeholder management. Rank order these in terms of their priorities for Coca-Cola and for PepsiCo.…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The existing players in the soft drink industry have much advantage relative to new entrants. First, supply-side economy discourages new entrants by forcing them to enter the market in large scale. CSD’s demand side benefits of scale also makes it difficult for new entrants to be accepted by the public. In 2002, a survey found that 37% of respondents chose a CSD because it is their favorite brand, while only 10% said so about bottled water. This demonstrates CSD customers’ high brand loyalty and their lack of desire to buy from new entrants. In terms of capital requirement, concentrate manufacturers only requires $25~$50 million to set up a plant that can serve the entire United States of America. Yet, new entrants may have difficulties competing with major players’ well-established brands and their large scale unrecoverable (therefore, hard to finance) spending on advertising. There is also unequal access to bottlers and retail channels for newcomers. Most bottlers are in long-term contracts with major CSD brands; also, the largest distribution channel, supermarkets, consider CSD a “big traffic draw”, thus provide little to no shelf space for newcomers. In addition, strong fear of retaliation from major players also makes newcomers hesitate to enter.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The retailers have a low to moderate buyer power over the consumer soft drink industry, due to the producer’s ability to forward integrate, the sheer number of buyers, and the buyer’s ability to forward integrate. Buyer power is the degree of influence customers have on the producing agent. Soft drink companies such as Coca Cola and Pepsi have used forward integration to take over their channels of distribution. They created contracts that gave them the ability to set concentrate prices for their bottlers; in turn bottlers would respond to price fulgurations by adjusting retail pricing. In 2000, when Coca Cola raised concentrate prices by 7.6%, bottlers raised the retail prices by 6 to 7%. This demonstrates that buyers have limited control over the price changes. Coca Cola has also made great efforts to take over the bottling of their product, by establishing the independent subsidiary Coca Cola Enterprises. They began by acquiring bottlers to produce one third of their volume during 1986 which increased to 80% in 2004. This gave Coca Cola more control over retail pricing, and distribution of their products to retail stores. Since there are so many retail stores that carry products that consumer soft drink, CSD, companies make, it is hard for buyers to create a collaborative effort to resist price increases.…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Favorite Brand Paper

    • 1366 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Coca-Cola Company has offered consumers “delicious and refreshing” (The Coca-Cola Company, 2014) beverages for over 100 years, beginning at a soda fountain in 1886 located in Atlanta, Georgia (The Coca-Cola Company, 2014). Coca-Cola has since grown to over 100 brands, $48 billion dollars in net operating revenues, and $9 billion dollars in net income as of 2012 (The Coca-Cola Company, 2014). Their beverages are available in more than 200 countries around the globe and North American accounts for 21% of their unit case volume world-wide (The Coca-Cola Company, 2014).…

    • 1366 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coke vs. Pepsi

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Looking at the historical trends of Coke and Pepsi in terms of EVA we find Coca-Cola's…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Threat of new competition: Barriers to entry in the CSD industry are extremely high and there are various factors to support this. Firstly, both C&P spend gargantuan amounts of funding of advertisement. According to Exhibit 8, in 2009 alone, both C&P spent $234 million and $145 million respectively in advertising expenditure. Therefore, while the actual initial capital investment needed to start up a CSD company is relatively economic, the amount required by new entrants to continually push their brand and gain visibility is extremely high. Due to these extreme levels of expenditure on marketing and brand awareness, the two cola companies have accrued exceedingly high levels of brand equity and consumer loyalty worldwide. As such, even with sufficient funds for start-up and subsequent advertising, new entrants are unlikely to sway persisting consumer tastes. Because of the sheer scale of both CSD companies, both C&P have pre-existing contracts with their bottlers, thus limiting their bottlers’ ability to produce similar products with rival brands. Additionally, through the use of extensive consolidation through the use of acquisitions and re-franchising of their bottlers, both C&P have made it essentially impossible for new entrants to find bottlers for the distribution of their drinks. In the event that the new entrants decide to build their own bottling plants (which is quoted to potentially cost…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola Wars Continue

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Soft drink industry is profitable because the industry has concentrated revenues between 2 major players and it is virtually impossible for a new player to compete with the key players. The industry giant's wield power over the retail outlets. Convenience stores, vending machines, fountains are widely distributed and hence they don't have the power to bargain over pricing issues and they also contribute to about 80 of the sales. This ensures that the companies quote a maximum price and still have the final say in the matter.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Energy Drinks

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The competition in the alternative beverage market was strong. Pepsi and Coca-Cola were competing for the top spot in the production and distribution of their beverages. The strongest competitive force was bargaining power and leverage of buyers. Most stores were negotiating for lower prices since they bought the beverages in large quantities. Since Pepsi and Coke had an established brand, their alternative beverages found automatic shelf space in most stores and wholesale clubs. The weakest of the five competitive forces was the bargaining power and leverage of suppliers. The reason is that the packaging from different suppliers was similar, thus it was easy to substitute the packaging from most suppliers, and thus they had weak bargaining power. The competitive force that seems to have the greatest effect on industry attractiveness is competition from substitutes. This is why there were many substitutes to alternative beverages that were sold at lower prices. The competitive force with the greatest effect on profitability of new entrants is a threat of entry.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays