Preview

Industry Analysis Csd

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2342 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Industry Analysis Csd
Mohan Shiv
Section #1
Boston College
Carroll School of Management

MM 720 Management Practice I

STRATEGIC ANALYSIS
Professor MCCLEELLAN

Case: Cola wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the 21st Century

September

INDUSTRY ANALYSIS OF THE CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS INDUSTRY
Description of the Industry
The industry of Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSD) is highly concentrated. The three major companies, Coca Cola, PepsiCo, and Cadbury Schweppes accounted in 1998 for more than 90% of market share by case volume –Exhibit 1-.
Generally, there are 4 participants in the market, involved in the process of production and distribution, namely, concentrate producers, bottlers, retail channels, and suppliers. Porter's 5 forces analysis reveals the following characteristics of the CSD industry:
1- A fierce competition exists among very few players: The industry is an oligopoly, or even a duopoly, given the intense rivalry between Coke and Pepsi, with a combined market share exceeding ¾ in 1998 (44.5% and 31.4%, respectively).
2- The threat of substitutes is reduced by the expansion of products portfolio: CSD have many alternative beverages, such as bottled water, juice and tea, which became more popular. Coke and Pepsi responded, either by launching new non carbonated soft drinks, or by acquiring new brands.
3- Suppliers have less bargaining power: The primary ingredients of CSD are sugar and packaging, which have many substitutes. For instance, sugar can be replaced by corn syrup or other sweeteners, and packaging can be processed using glass, plastic or metal cans. All these commodities exist in excess in the market and are provided by several suppliers. Coke and Pepsi negotiated, on behalf of their bottlers, contracts with suppliers and maintained lasting relationships with them.
4- Different levels of bargaining power exist among the groups of buyers: The retail channels basically include food stores, convenience stores, fountain outlets, and vending. Exhibit 2

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The case study “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006” focuses on describing Coke and Pepsi within the CSD industry by providing detailed statements about the companies’ accounts and strategies to increase their market share. ‘ Cola war’ is the term used to describe the campaign of mutually targeted television advertisement & marketing campaigns between Coke & Pepsi. Furthermore, the case also focuses on the Coke vs. Pepsi goods which target similar groups of costumers, and how these companies have had and still have great reputation and continue to take risks due to their high capital.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola War

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages

    For over a century, carbonated drink was introduced to mankind. Two major contenders in the industry stand Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. The two soar in the industry as they compete with each other. There were amazing monopolistic behaviors found in their doings. Have you ever wondered why such drink without any redeeming health benefits, but rather sublimely known as one of the causes to sugar and fat related diseases, can be so profitable? By setting the health benefits aside, have you ever wondered why such drinks are so popular yet a lot of competitors are unable to imitate and stand up to beat them? The secret lies…

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Marketing Plan Paper

    • 4475 Words
    • 7 Pages

    of soda. With new trends emerging from the carbonated soft drink industry we see our…

    • 4475 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars Case

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Concentrate Producers and Bottlers were two of the four major participants that were involved in the production and distribution of Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs) in the United States.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cola wars continue

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the 5-forces model, each industry’s profitability can be assessed considering the five forces that influence the market – The rivalry among existing competitors, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of new entrants, and threat of substitute products or services. Considering the rivalry among existing competitors, the rivalry is very intense. Among national concentrate producers, Coke and Pepsi claimed a combined 72% of the U.S. CSD market’s sales volume. The Cola war has begun in 1950s and the competition is still ongoing. Also, the competitions in other sectors of drinks and between small concentrate producers were harsh.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The retailers have a low to moderate buyer power over the consumer soft drink industry, due to the producer’s ability to forward integrate, the sheer number of buyers, and the buyer’s ability to forward integrate. Buyer power is the degree of influence customers have on the producing agent. Soft drink companies such as Coca Cola and Pepsi have used forward integration to take over their channels of distribution. They created contracts that gave them the ability to set concentrate prices for their bottlers; in turn bottlers would respond to price fulgurations by adjusting retail pricing. In 2000, when Coca Cola raised concentrate prices by 7.6%, bottlers raised the retail prices by 6 to 7%. This demonstrates that buyers have limited control over the price changes. Coca Cola has also made great efforts to take over the bottling of their product, by establishing the independent subsidiary Coca Cola Enterprises. They began by acquiring bottlers to produce one third of their volume during 1986 which increased to 80% in 2004. This gave Coca Cola more control over retail pricing, and distribution of their products to retail stores. Since there are so many retail stores that carry products that consumer soft drink, CSD, companies make, it is hard for buyers to create a collaborative effort to resist price increases.…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Demand for Coca-Cola supplier’s products is low because the ingredients used for soft drinks are commodities. In addition, materials such as cans and plastic bottles are also commodities that can be purchased from any chosen supplier because it has a low switching cost. Therefore, the bargaining power of suppliers is weak.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Background: The Atlanta–based Coca-Cola Company controls about 65 per cent of the soft-drink market. Pepsi-Cola has about 15 per cent. The rest belong to other soft-drink products.…

    • 3630 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Global beverage companies such as Coca Cola and PepsiCo had relied on such beverages to sustain in volume growth in mature markets where consumers were reducing their consumption of carbonated soft drinks.…

    • 3089 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The soft drink industry in the United States is a highly profitably, but competitive market. In 2000, carbonated soft drink retail sales were estimated $60.3 billion, however, soft drink consumption growth has slowed in recent years. There are three major companies that hold the majority of sales in the carbonated soft drink industry in the U.S. They are the Coca Cola Company with 44.1% market share, The Pepsi-Cola Company with 31.4% market share, and Dr. Pepper/ Seven Up, Inc. with 14.7% market share. These three companies market the top ten brands account for 73% of soft drink sales in the U.S. Dr. Pepper/ Seven Up, Inc. owns two of the top ten brands: Dr. Pepper and 7UP.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola Wars Continue

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Soft drink industry is profitable because the industry has concentrated revenues between 2 major players and it is virtually impossible for a new player to compete with the key players. The industry giant's wield power over the retail outlets. Convenience stores, vending machines, fountains are widely distributed and hence they don't have the power to bargain over pricing issues and they also contribute to about 80 of the sales. This ensures that the companies quote a maximum price and still have the final say in the matter.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3 main substitutes include alliances/contracts, and product innovation. Pepsi-Cola and Coca-Cola continually battled for fountain usage at fast food restaurants, bottler companies, sweetener pricing, and various territories.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rivalry: Revenues are extremely concentrated in this industry, with Coke and Pepsi, together with their…

    • 3389 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola War Case

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Production and Distribution of CSD involved 4 major players: Concentrate producers, bottlers, retail channels and suppliers…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abl Case Study

    • 2789 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Non-alcoholic beverages industry is in mature stage. The industry tends to focus more on introducing different products (milk drink, sports drink, ready to drink coffee/tea and energy drink) other than carbonated soft drinks that experiencing declining consumption, which shows in Table 1 the total CSDs market share had been declining since 2001 (62.80%) to 2011 (51%).…

    • 2789 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays