Preview

Cola Wars: Porters 5 Forces

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1842 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cola Wars: Porters 5 Forces
Michael Porter developed five different forces in a framework he felt influenced industries. This framework was designed to help companies find ways to off-set a rival company and to help develop a more solid business plan. It has been known over the years a rivalry has existed been two of the biggest soda companies, Coca Cola and Pepsi. Three of Porter’s forces that are exemplified in this “coke war” are buyer power, barriers to entry, and rivalry which will be explained and elaborated on in the following essay.

Buyer Power The retailers have a low to moderate buyer power over the consumer soft drink industry, due to the producer’s ability to forward integrate, the sheer number of buyers, and the buyer’s ability to forward integrate. Buyer power is the degree of influence customers have on the producing agent. Soft drink companies such as Coca Cola and Pepsi have used forward integration to take over their channels of distribution. They created contracts that gave them the ability to set concentrate prices for their bottlers; in turn bottlers would respond to price fulgurations by adjusting retail pricing. In 2000, when Coca Cola raised concentrate prices by 7.6%, bottlers raised the retail prices by 6 to 7%. This demonstrates that buyers have limited control over the price changes. Coca Cola has also made great efforts to take over the bottling of their product, by establishing the independent subsidiary Coca Cola Enterprises. They began by acquiring bottlers to produce one third of their volume during 1986 which increased to 80% in 2004. This gave Coca Cola more control over retail pricing, and distribution of their products to retail stores. Since there are so many retail stores that carry products that consumer soft drink, CSD, companies make, it is hard for buyers to create a collaborative effort to resist price increases. Buyer power also suffers if retailers are fragmented and are not concentrated to a single type. Almost any type of store will

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    For this reason the Coca-Cola organization uses a duopoly type strategy in order to maximize profit potential. With the duopolies type strategy Cola-Cola can increase product prices without the concern of customer decrease. It also will give them the advantage of other market competition. By keeping product prices below of new market competitors, it can force out other competitors when they are unable to keep up product demand. Once the competition has been run out the market, Coca-Cola can increase product prices to normal (Henry…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Coke Wars Case Study

    • 3862 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The rivalry between Coca-Cola & Pepsi can be deemed as legendary, “the top soft drink competitors in the world spend millions of dollars yearly to try and convince you that their version of soft drink is better” (Dotson pg 1). Over the past century, it seems they have feuded over everything from who has superior taste, to the pursuit into space, and more recently over NASCAR and the social media race. Regardless of who is ahead in the competition, the battles between Coca-Cola & Pepsi demonstrate important strategic adaptations that the corporations must execute so as to thrive in the constantly changing realms of customer satisfaction, business environments and technology. This paper will: 1) review the strategic issues presented in the “Coke Wars” case through the use of the Strategic Management Model as applied to both Coca-Cola & Pepsi; 2) highlight fundamental strategies & tactics so as to analyze the inherent competition between both corporations; and finally 3) discuss implications of concepts presented in the case for the middle manager so as to grasp lessons learned for future application.…

    • 3862 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Michael Porter, an authority on competitive strategy, contends that a corporation is most concerned with the intensity of competition within its industry (Wheelen and Hunger pg110). The level of this intensity is determined by basic competitive forces (Wheelen and Hunger pg110).…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola War

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages

    For over a century, carbonated drink was introduced to mankind. Two major contenders in the industry stand Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. The two soar in the industry as they compete with each other. There were amazing monopolistic behaviors found in their doings. Have you ever wondered why such drink without any redeeming health benefits, but rather sublimely known as one of the causes to sugar and fat related diseases, can be so profitable? By setting the health benefits aside, have you ever wondered why such drinks are so popular yet a lot of competitors are unable to imitate and stand up to beat them? The secret lies…

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars Case

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Using Porter’s Five Forces analysis for the CPs industry, we determined that the Bargaining Power of Buyers was low. In 1987, Coke’s Master Bottler Contract granted Coke the right to determine the concentrate price based on a pricing formula that adjusted quarterly and stated a maximum price for the sweetener used in the production. Pepsi’s Master Bottling Agreement required that top bottler purchased its raw materials from Pepsi on terms and conditions determined by Pepsi. These agreements limited the opportunity for price negotiations between the buyers and the CPs.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Five Forces (Coke Wars)

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The barriers to entry in this market are fairly high. Both Coke and Pepsi have franchising agreements with existing bottling companies. These agreements prohibit the bottler’s from taking on new soft drink companies. This makes it very hard for a new soft drink company to find a bottler willing to distribute their product. Coke and Pepsi have also been able to develop loyal customers through their brand image, which would make it hard for a new soft drink company to find consumers.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cola wars continue

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the 5-forces model, each industry’s profitability can be assessed considering the five forces that influence the market – The rivalry among existing competitors, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of new entrants, and threat of substitute products or services. Considering the rivalry among existing competitors, the rivalry is very intense. Among national concentrate producers, Coke and Pepsi claimed a combined 72% of the U.S. CSD market’s sales volume. The Cola war has begun in 1950s and the competition is still ongoing. Also, the competitions in other sectors of drinks and between small concentrate producers were harsh.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Porter’s framework describes an industry as being influenced by five forces: buyer power, supplier power, threat of substitutes, threat of new entrants and the degree of rivalry between existing firms within the industry. A strategic business manager can use Porter’s model to more clearly understand the industry environment in which its firm operates and to therefore develop a competitive edge over rival firms. After analyzing the carbonated soft drink, ready-to-eat breakfast cereal and specialty coffee industries using this framework, I found that the three industries were very similar in their degree of bargaining power among suppliers, threat of substitutes and most importantly, the degree of rivalry among existing firms. However, the three industries varied in their degree of buyer power and threat of new entrants.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The existing players in the soft drink industry have much advantage relative to new entrants. First, supply-side economy discourages new entrants by forcing them to enter the market in large scale. CSD’s demand side benefits of scale also makes it difficult for new entrants to be accepted by the public. In 2002, a survey found that 37% of respondents chose a CSD because it is their favorite brand, while only 10% said so about bottled water. This demonstrates CSD customers’ high brand loyalty and their lack of desire to buy from new entrants. In terms of capital requirement, concentrate manufacturers only requires $25~$50 million to set up a plant that can serve the entire United States of America. Yet, new entrants may have difficulties competing with major players’ well-established brands and their large scale unrecoverable (therefore, hard to finance) spending on advertising. There is also unequal access to bottlers and retail channels for newcomers. Most bottlers are in long-term contracts with major CSD brands; also, the largest distribution channel, supermarkets, consider CSD a “big traffic draw”, thus provide little to no shelf space for newcomers. In addition, strong fear of retaliation from major players also makes newcomers hesitate to enter.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Demand for Coca-Cola supplier’s products is low because the ingredients used for soft drinks are commodities. In addition, materials such as cans and plastic bottles are also commodities that can be purchased from any chosen supplier because it has a low switching cost. Therefore, the bargaining power of suppliers is weak.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola War

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Soft drinks are profitable because it is a $60 billion industry in the United States alone. Not only is it profitable in the United States, but both Pepsi and Coca-Cola have expanded their franchises internationally and both have become competitive brands. It is estimated that the average American can consume about 53 gallons of carbonated soft drinks a year. According to the article, Americans drink more soda than any other beverages on the market today, such as sports drinks, juices, and beers. This makes carbonated soft drinks more profitable than the other beverages because it has a higher consumption rate. Another reason why carbonated soft drinks are profitable is that it is easy to make since it is made up of a flavor base with added sweetener and carbonated water. These main ingredients are relatively cheap compared to the bottling process. Since 1970, the growth of carbonated soft drinks continues to rise 3% per year for the next 30 years because of diet carbonated soft drinks and other flavored drinks. Soft drinks are also found in supermarkets, convenient stores, vending machines, and restaraunts. This makes the soft drinks more accessible to their customers. Soft drinks are also consumed by cans, plastic bottles, glass bottles, and fountain drinks.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pepsi vs. Coke

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The rivalry of Coca-cola and Pepsi is extremely widespread. In order to remain competitive in a two-person race it is important to analyze the way a company does business. This article gave a competitive analysis between Coke and Pepsi by looking at both the industry structure and at the individual competitors. As it looks at the industry structure, it refers to Porter’s Five-Force model to determine Coke and Pepsi’s strengths and weaknesses. Secondly, at the individual competitor level, it analyzes how Coca-Cola and Pepsi position themselves, in external markets, to sustain a competitive edge.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Interdependence- Less number of firms results in greater interdependence. Any change in price or output by a firm has a direct effect on the rival, which then retaliates and changes its own price or output. So, the oligopolist not only considers the market demand for the industry’s product but also the reaction of other firms in the Industry and more than one reaction pattern is possible from the rival’s side. This phenomenon is evident in soft drink as well. Since their inception in Indian market every time there has been some specific price setting it h was a simultaneous move and not a sequential move. Coke was a company ruling the markets before Pepsi entered. Earlier the price of coke was cost based i.e. it was decided on the cost which was spent on making the product plus the profit and other expenses. But after the emergence of other companies especially the…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crown Cork & Seal

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Due to consolidation in the soft drink bottling industry there were four main buyers: Coca-Cola Company, Anheuser Busch, PepsiCo Inc., and Coca-Cola Enterprises. They established relationships with multiple can suppliers so they had significant bargaining power over them. If a supplier charged unreasonable prices or provided poor customer service, buyers would reduce their order sizes or take their business elsewhere. There was no…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Cinco Forças de Porter

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Michael E. Porter é uma figura essencial do Marketing Estratégico. Autor de quase duas dezenas de livros e artigos, sobretudo nas áreas da Estratégia e da Competividade. As Cinco forças de Porter são pela primeira vez mencionadas e estruturadas no seu artigo “How competitive forces shape strategy” para o Harvard Business Review na edição de Março-Abril, onde em dez páginas esboça os princípios do que define como as cinco forças da competitividade.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays