At the Exposition, Native Americans served a dual purpose, albeit a contradicting one. While they were showcased as objects of civility and Christianity, Native Americans were also portrayed in the exact opposite manner of civility and Christianity: barbarity and savagery. Rydell’s argument, while effective, loses some of the nuance of the reactions by government agents regarding the deliberate contradiction of the Native American presence at the Exposition. Some government agents, particularly those connected to military affairs, appear to have reacted indifferently towards the apparent contradiction and in fact seemed more concerned with menial issues than the stalling of Native American “progression.” Yet, other government agents, particularly those more invested in the advancement and assimilation of Native Americans, expressed similar concerns to those suggested by
At the Exposition, Native Americans served a dual purpose, albeit a contradicting one. While they were showcased as objects of civility and Christianity, Native Americans were also portrayed in the exact opposite manner of civility and Christianity: barbarity and savagery. Rydell’s argument, while effective, loses some of the nuance of the reactions by government agents regarding the deliberate contradiction of the Native American presence at the Exposition. Some government agents, particularly those connected to military affairs, appear to have reacted indifferently towards the apparent contradiction and in fact seemed more concerned with menial issues than the stalling of Native American “progression.” Yet, other government agents, particularly those more invested in the advancement and assimilation of Native Americans, expressed similar concerns to those suggested by