He uses counterevidence to his advantage by stating the argument that it supports and explaining why it does not make sense to his larger argument of localized context of events motivated by political or economic gain. For example, on page 4 of the introduction, he begins to describe the implications of Cohn (noted Historian)’s argument and then explains in annotated bibliography on the same page that some Historians believe, “the struggle [of Christianity and Judaism] is not inevitable, necessary, or essential…it is only contingent…thus A. and H. Cutler, whose translation of Blumenkranz was just quoted that he could not agree more with these sentiments but proceed on the same page to argue that Anti-Muslimism was the primary factor in the revival of anti-Semitism during the High Middle Ages “. Nirenberg manages to discredit the argument of A. and H. Cutler hinting that his is likely to be better thought out and supported by greater amounts of evidence. Nirenberg’s argument is very well thought out and he even uses the archives of the Crown of Aragon in order to reconstruct his narrative of localized
He uses counterevidence to his advantage by stating the argument that it supports and explaining why it does not make sense to his larger argument of localized context of events motivated by political or economic gain. For example, on page 4 of the introduction, he begins to describe the implications of Cohn (noted Historian)’s argument and then explains in annotated bibliography on the same page that some Historians believe, “the struggle [of Christianity and Judaism] is not inevitable, necessary, or essential…it is only contingent…thus A. and H. Cutler, whose translation of Blumenkranz was just quoted that he could not agree more with these sentiments but proceed on the same page to argue that Anti-Muslimism was the primary factor in the revival of anti-Semitism during the High Middle Ages “. Nirenberg manages to discredit the argument of A. and H. Cutler hinting that his is likely to be better thought out and supported by greater amounts of evidence. Nirenberg’s argument is very well thought out and he even uses the archives of the Crown of Aragon in order to reconstruct his narrative of localized