Eurasian Empires, 500 BCE- 500 CE
Definitions:
Empire: A very large business or group of businesses under the control of one person or company.
Tribute: Something that proves the good quality or success of something
Imperial: Relating to or suggestive of an empire or an emperor
Commercial Exchange: Connected with trade or commerce
Absolute Monarchs: someone who wields unrestricted political power over the sovereign state and its people
Beuraucry: It’s a system of government in which important decisions are made by a state official and not by elected representatives
Infrastructure: the basic physical and organizational structures and services
Centralized: Means control under a single authority
Emigration: The act of leaving a country with the intent of settling permanently in another one.
Popular participation: A public participation or practice that may be also recognized as a right.
Democracy: A system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state
Debt slavery: A person’s pledge of their labor for a balance due or other obligation
Despotism: The use of absolute power in a cruel and unfair way
Dissemination: The act of spreading rumors or information widely
Cosmopolitan: Being familiar with many different countries and cultures
Assimilation: The process by which a person acquire the social and psychological characteristics of a group
Autocratic: Relating to a ruler who has absolute power
Republic: A state in which supreme power is held by the people and their representatives
Aristocracy: The highest class in certain societies specially those holding hereditary titles
Civil Service: The administrative service of a government of the armed forces
Eunuchs: A man who may have been castrated typically early enough in his life
Barbarians: A member of a community or tribe not belonging to one of the greatest civilizations
Regionalism: Interest in or loyalty to a particular region
Darius: The third king of the Persian Empire
Athens and Sparta: The two city-states that best represent each form of government were Sparta is oligarchy and Athens democracy
Alexander the Great: He was the king of ancient Greek kingdom of Macedon
Caesar Augustus: The founder of the Roman Empire and also became its emperor from 27 BC until his death in 14 AD
Pax Romana: The peace that existed between nationalities within the Roman Empire
Qin Shihuangdi: The king of the state of Qin who conquered states and united china
Legalism: Strict conformity to the law or to a religious or moral code
Mandate of Heaven: An ancient Chinese belief that Gods granted emperors the right to rule based on their ability to govern well and fairly
Wudi: He was the seventh emperor of the Han Dynasty of China ruling from 141 to 87 BC
Byzantine Empire: It was the Eastern half of the Roman Empire during the Middle Ages
Xiongnu: The Chinese name for the confederacy of Turkish-speaking peoples who were nomadic herders of horses, sheep, and camels in Central Asia
Aryans: Indo-European nomadic pastoralists who replaced Harappan civilization; militarized society
Ashoka: Grandson on Chandragupta Maurya; took Mauryan dynasty to its heights; converted to Buddhism and preached nonviolence
QUESTIONS:
1. What are the political characteristics of the Persian Empire? The Persian Empire had an absolute monarchy meaning that the ruler can make any decisions he wanted to and whatever he decided was final. They were mostly, run by kings and allowed a the satrapy system. A satrapy system was an administrative group. A satrap (governor) administered the region, a general supervised military, and estate secretary kept official records. The general and the state secretary reported directly to the central government. The Persian Empire had 23 satrapies and they used a silver and gold coinage system.
2. Compare Greek political organization to Persian political organization. What accounts for the differences? The government in Persia was relatively consistent over that time span. It had been a benevolent dictatorship, First under the Achaemenids, then the Parthian, and then the Sassanids. The Greeks, on the other hand, lack the unity of Persia. Yunanistan, at first, was a collection of diverse city states, ranging from the civil, cultured, and free Athenians, to the tyrannical regimes of Corinth and Argos. Later in, Sophists propelled the Greeks to accept Christianity, and from that point forth, Greece went down the toilet. The Byzantines, Christian heirs to the Greeks and Romans, had a tyrannical government and it paid for its foolishness when Ibn Khalid marched in and defeated them against all odds.
3. What were the political foundations of the Roman Empire? How did the foundations of Rome change over time? What stayed the same? The empire's foundations started out as a kingdom. It then switched to a republic because of tyrannical kings. Later, it became an empire due to the conquest of Julius Gaius Caesar. Thus, under the empire, the senate didn't have as much power. What stayed the same is giving the public a specific amount of voice in government.
4. Compare the political characteristics of the Roman Empire to Han China Two empires that were taking shape at the same time that the Greeks and Persians collided were the Roman Empire and China's imperial state. The Roman Empire was located on the far western side meanwhile China's imperial state was located on the far eastern end. They had some similarities such as their population size from 50 million to 60 million people. At their time they were the giant empires that's shaped the lives of close to half of the worlds population. Around 509 B.C.E the Roman aristocrats have thrown off the monarchy and established a republic. The republic was taken charge of the patricians which were known as the wealthiest class. They have as well created a written code of law that offered plebeians, a poor class, some protection from abuse. Romans took great pride in this political system. China as well adopted a political philosophy called Legalism, which taught clear rules and harsh punishments as a means of enforcing the authority of the state. Between 264 and 146 B.C.E Roman resulted victorious in the Punic wars with Carthage which extended Roman control over the western Mediterranean and made roman a naval power. Meanwhile China launched a military campaign to reunify China and in just ten years soundly defeated the other warring states. The Chinese process of empire formation was far more compressed than the Roman effort, but it was no less dependent on military force and no less brutal scholars who opposed Shihuangdi's policies.
5. What were the similarities and differences in the collapse of the Roman and Chinese empires? The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were two of the most powerful entities to rule their respective parts of the world. Both states controlled a large portion of the world population and produced political and cultural legacies.The Roman Empire became steeped in debt as emperors tried desperately to buy the loyalty of the army, and the moral condition of its subjects continued to spiral downward. They both fell because of weak leaders and power hungry individuals. The Han practice of concubinage led to much violence and strife in the royal family, causing disunity and internal conflict. Regents often attempted to seize power. Love of money led to the precarious situations of Rome’s later emperors, as soldiers demanded gold for loyalty. In both empires, corruption of government contributed to the bitterness of the common people. All of these things arise from the selfishness in the human heart. 6. What were the political characteristics of classical India? Why did India’s government differ from Rome and China? Indian plains divided into powerful regional states in India: some monarchies, others republics dominated by assemblies of priests’ warriors. China and India have followed radically different approaches to economic development. China's resulted from a conscious decision; India more or less happened upon its course.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Democracy: a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives.…
- 329 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
– A political system in which government is by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives…
- 759 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
2. Many of our terms for describing the distribution of political power are derived from the ancient Greeks, who were the first Western people to study politics systematically. A society in which political decisions were controlled by a small group was called an oligarchy, meaning rule by a few members of the elite, who generally benefited themselves. Another form of rule by the few was known as aristocracy, meaning rule by the most virtuous, the most talented, or the best suited to the position. Later in European history, aristocracy meant rule by the titled or the upper classes. In contrast to such a top-down form of control was the form known as anarchy, or the condition of no government. Anarchy exists when each individual makes his or her own rules for behavior, and there are no laws and no…
- 4516 Words
- 19 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Monarchy: single person is sovereign, vested with complete authority -- executive, legislative, and judicial powers…
- 541 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Emigration refers to the process by which a person leaves his place or country of residency, to relocate elsewhere. Immigration means to come to a country of which one is not a native, usually for permanent residence.Therefore, the difference between emigrate and immigrate relates to the point of…
- 792 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Crown – has ultimate power, beyond that held by any particular government at any particular time…
- 1141 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
On a deeper level – means to be fair and just; you may need to…
- 1161 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
* Generally interpreted to refer to a form of government where a legislature with significant decision-making powers is freely elected. It is also sometimes argued that representatives should reflect the social and gender composition of the electorate.…
- 508 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Both Sonja Tanner’s “On Plato’s Cave” and Margaret Atwood’s “The Writer’s Responsibility” focus on the juxtaposition between the real and the imagined; A, however, suggests that it is, in fact, society’s ignorance and willingness to ignore the relationship between the real and the imagined that leads to the writer’s responsibility to make the relationship clear, while T highlights that the relationship is strained and obscured and that the responsibility is on the individual to forge the connections between the real and the imagined.…
- 297 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
○ Stolen Generation - Mixed blood children where taken away from their families to be raised with new names and in a new culture (european).…
- 314 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In this essay I will be comparing and contrasting "Gracious Goodness", by Marge Piercy and "To Have Succeeded", by Ralph Waldo Emerson. Both these poem provided different meanings to be succeesful. Most people think having money or being famous is the key to being succeesful, but that's not the case.…
- 275 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The baker in “A Small Good Thing” by Raymond Carver caught my attention from the beginning of the story. He was abrupt with Ann, but it felt like there were reasons that would be explained soon why he was this way. The initial impression I got from him wasn’t likeable but as I got further into the story, there was a spark of compassion in this man that I could relate to. The bakers harassing tendencies and social isolation as a person are not traits I exhibit, where as his strong sense of compassion and emotion is where I can relate more to.…
- 583 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When comparing and contrasting the poem “What It's Like to Be a Black Girl” by Patricia Smith with the short story “Country Lovers” By Nadine Gordimer. The character in “What It's Like to Be a Black Girl” is based more upon recent time while “Country Lovers” is based in a older time frame. However, both stories are uniquely about wanting to be loved. The poem and the short story are both great examples of the difficulty of life between two different ethnic backgrounds. While one concentrates more on tragedy the other is faced more with acceptance that leads to tragedy. Love although can't be explained, has many explanations to how one can love. Whether your love goes as deep as loving through tragic times or looking for someone to love you at all times. Both of these stories focus on issues of racism, inner struggles, slavery, prejudice, and the pursuit of freedom as well as equality. At the end, everyone wants and needs to be accepted and will do whatever it takes.…
- 906 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
1. Democracy - a form of government in which all eligible people have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives.…
- 5943 Words
- 24 Pages
Powerful Essays -
| A system in which the political rights and interests of individuals are subordinated, usually by coercion, to the interests of the state.…
- 512 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays