When working with clients in today’s society it’s extremely important to take into consideration the specific needs of each individual. Serious contemplation is given to the approaches and methods regarding the client’s need and presenting matters. Trauma appears in many forms in society, even from the 1960’s due to the impact on returning soldiers from war. Since this, trauma has been categorised and widely researched leading to numerous theories. Psychotherapies were one of the first approaches to be founded in the 1970’s, which were the foundations to counselling approaches, Cognitive behavioural therapies are a more recent adaptation of behavioural therapies.
Throughout this assignment cognitive behavioural treatment and psychodynamic approaches will be analysed to therefore compare and contrast. This will then lead to an evaluation of which approach would be the most appropriate when working with a client with post traumatic stress disorder. As for most individuals seeking treatment, it is extremely important to know that there is a distinct difference between both counselling approaches. Even though both approaches will lead to the same output it’s the road they take to get there that would be different and to each individual it is essential that the correct route is taken.
Posttraumatic stress disorder is an anxiety disorder that can develop after exposure to any occasion that would result in psychological trauma. During a lifetime, it is the early stages in life that basic psychodynamics of the person are established of psychosexual development. The role of following experiences is determined by the motivational patterns established in early childhood (Mischel, 1971).
The first researched counselling approach developed from Freud’s traditional psychoanalysis is psychodynamic.
References: 1. Alexander, P. C. (1993). The differential effects of abuse characteristics and attachment in the prediction of long-term effects of sexual abuse. Journal of interpersonal violence, 8, 346-362 2. Allen, J. G. (2001). Traumatic relationships and serious mental disorders. New York : Wiley. 3. Clarkin, J. F., Yeomans, F., & Kernberg, O. F. (1999). Psychotherapy of borderline personality. New York : Wiley. 4. Diamond, D., Clarkin, J., Levine, H., Levy, K., Foelsch, P., & Yoemans, F.(1999). Borderland conditions and attachment: A preliminary report. Psychoanalytic inquiry, 19, 831-884. 5. Fonagy,P., Steele, H., & Steele. (1991). Maternal representations of attachment during pregnancy predict the organisation of infant mothers attachment at one year of age. Child development, 62, 891-905 6. Green, B. L., Goodman, L. A., Krupnick, J. L., Corcoran, C. B., Petty, R. M., Stockton, P., et al. (2000). Outcomes of single versus multiple trauma exposure in a screening sample. Journal of traumatic stress, 13, 271-286 7. Harvey, M. R., & Harney, P. A (1997). Addressing the aftermath of interpersonal violence: The case for long-term care. Psychoanalysis inquiry, 29-44 8. Kessler, R. C., Sonnega., A., Bromet, E., Hughes, M., & Nelson, C. B. (1995). Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of general psychiatry, 52, 1048- 1060