1. what is meant by the term agreed ways of working ? These are your policies and procedures based on sector standards and guidelines and individuals' care plans. To implement agreed ways of working you follow the care plan.…
Then the great compromise was reached on June 29, 1787. This was a combination of the New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan Connecticut Compromise, which stated that there would be two houses (bicameral). One house would have equal representation and the other would be based on population. It was called the Connecticut Compromise because Roger Sherman, who had offered a compromise dealing with the issues of slavery and representation, was from Connecticut. Members of the House of Representatives (lower house) would be appointed among the states according to population and would be elected by the people. Members of the Senate (upper house) would be chosen by the lower house and would have an equal number of representatives for each state. The House has the power to originate all bills for raising or spending money (they write the bills to be passed) and the Senate favors the smaller states with two senators for each state. This compromise also included the Three-Fifths Compromise which tackled the issue of slaves being…
The great compromise was an agreement between the states that government should be split into the two houses, House of Representatives and Senate. Document D, a section of the Constitution, explains what each of the two houses can do. In article 1, section 2, about the House of Representatives, it states, “Representatives...shall be apportioned... according to…(population)”. Later in article 1, section 3, this time about the Senate, it writes, “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two senators from each state, chosen by the legislatures thereof for six years…”.…
A compromise that was made was the Great Compromise. The Great Compromise was an agreement that small and large states made. This compromise stated the representation and legislative structure each state should have under the U.S. Constitution. The outcome of the Great Compromise was that each state would have two representatives in the upper house.…
Patrick Henry and Benjamin Franklin both knew that success sometimes requires persistence along with compromise. Compromise is defined by The Oxford Dictionary as an agreement or a settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions. By using this definition and analyzing these speeches, it is obvious to readers that both politicians were willing to make compromises. There are however many differences as to the extent and what type of concessions these gentlemen were willing to make.…
The Great Compromise is also known as the Connecticut Compromise. The Great Compromise saved the Constitutional Convention, and probably the Union too. It called for proportional representation in the House, and in the State. The Great Compromise was held at the Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia. There were many disputes over the proposals of being small and large states between the North and South. This was all an idea so the lower house would be treated equally as to the upper house. The lower house was the House of Representatives, and the upper houuse was the Senate. The Virginia and New Jersey Plan led up to the Great Compromise. The Great Compromise rose leading up to the new plans and actions of the United States. It also stated that the more people the state had, then the more representatives they would have in the…
Even though Asians came to America voluntarily and African Americas were brought involuntarily as slaves (a significant difference), both share similar discrimination experiences at the hands of White Americans fighting to maintain their dominance.…
Compromise is a “lose-lose” approach. It is when everyone gives something up that they value (Wright State University, u.d.). The compromise approach requires individuals to cooperate with one another, but it is an easy way out if each individual has an equally important goal, when collaborating could have been a better solution for the group of individuals.…
In Steven L. Taylor’s report Americans Want Their Leaders to Stand and Fight he states, “Nearly half of America—including nearly two thirds of Republicans and 53 percent of independents—admires political leaders who refuse to compromise” and, “The survey found 49 percent of all respondents admire political leaders who stick to their positions without compromising.” His report goes on to state how no compromise in a democracy is impossible due to all interests and needs being impossible to fill. Taylor’s report clearly states a lack of any compromise will maintain the status quo and nothing would be accomplished. I agree with Taylor’s report that compromise is sometimes needed or the status que will be what we are left with. But, this is only because of the current process of creating, presenting, and voting Congress is currently using. If Congress is one political party heavy the only way anything can be accomplished in the current system is through compromising. This is not what the voters want based on what was stated by the voters in Taylor’s report. The voters are clearly looking for their representatives to stand up for them and their needs with little to no compromise. The issue with not compromising in today’s system is nothing will occur, so what needs to change is the process so compromising everything is not needed to accomplish…
Compromising 101- The course I would create would be designed after the age old question of "Why can't we all just get along?". Nearly everybody at least in the United States have heard this common saying, and nearly all who have heard it have implemented it now and then. The question shows us, as humans, our biggest downfall. Too many people can not put their differences aside for the greater good of humanity. They cannot make a compromise to create a safer world for the rest of us.…
U2Q3T6 In Federalist Papers 2 and 3 Publius asserted that “nothing is more certain than the indispensable necessity of government.” Publius recognized that the basic nature of government, consistent with Locke’s natural rights philosophy, is compromise; regardless of how “it is instituted, the people must cede to it some of their natural rights in order to vest it with requisite powers.” Publius saw benefits to the delegates creating compromises that “would conduce more to the interest of the people” since the many delegates, “being convened from different parts of the country...brought with them and communicated to each other a variety of useful information.” Each delegate, coming to the convention, “carried into it their accumulated knowledge…
In my experience as a psychological therapist and attorney, individuals who are resistant to compromise do not need more pressure to compromise, but instead more support for their resistance. The use of compromise is a common solution to resolving disagreements in negotiation and discussion processes. While it may produce an agreement, compromise does not always resolve problems that contain underlying interpersonal or organizational conflict. This is because compromise is frequently a "settled" resolution to a problem and not typically the optimal solution sought by either party. It may generate a functional or material solution but not resolve emotional or behavioural issues associated with the disagreement. As a result one or both parties in the dispute may continue to harbour ill feelings or other dissatisfaction that can surface again if the parties continue to have contact with each other.…
There was a situation between two students in which they had a disagreement on which approach to take on a team project. There were names called and a lot of agree between the two. I went with the negotiation method. I wanted to hear both sides’ arguments and see what we can do to pull this project all together. I want to make sure I was being fair in resolving this conflict and to make sure both sides input was a part of this project. Working with a team is not always easy for students, but the outcome of the project was all worth it.…
Every conflict will resolve but I don't believe that there's always a winner. If your positive that…
Nursing as a career is chosen for many different reasons. Some are interested in the human body, and others want to help those in need. The nursing experience is one not easily forgotten, but often taken for granted. Nurses and their value have been weighted more heavily in the past 10 years for its relevance to the survival of medicine. The nursing shortage has created a national outcry for the need to encourage nursing as a career. “As the nursing shortage peaked nurses who were left at the bedside found working conditions unacceptable and many left the profession in search of other work”.(Allen, Jan-Feb 2008, p. 35) The shortage gave rise to the nurse being recognized as a valued and need professional. The RN to BSN programs now available to all working RN’s helps development nurses behaviors and skills as trained professionals. Before this course my nursing practice was on auto polit. I arrived to work, and started my assignment the same way every day. I start by assessing all patients assigned to me, then review their medication, and last administer prescribed medication. I would give education when it was warranted. For instance, if a patient had received a new Foley catheter and was going home with the catheter I would education them on home use. After my transition to professional nursing I recognized the legal responsibility to safe guard the patient. After this class I increased the need to make evidenced based practice (EVP) guidelines applicable to every aspect of my nursing care. My interactions with patients during this class involved how I could use EVP to safe guard my patients and provide a high level of professional nursing care. The RN-BSN program is helping me mature and develop my nursing practice as a professional learner who uses EVP to provide the best nursing care possible.…