Compare And Contrast Daoism And Confucianism
They began fashion fibers made out of hemp, bark, and textile fibers to create paper. Artisans used iron to create agricultural tools, swords, and some iron armor. They then made silk that became a prized commodity throughout the world. Technology in this age caused china to become one of the most bustling and prosperous economies
Silkworm farming was a technology they used for silk.
There was an expansion of iron metallurgy. Used for superior weaponry and tools that increase food production.
Daoism was a belief that one should be "at one with nature and the universe". It did not teach its followers that activism in political situations would change anything. It taught that one should let things be the way that they were and it would all come together eventually. Confucianism on the other hand, taught its followers that they should be active in political affairs. It also taught that one should be respectful to their elders, and that propriety was a necessary trait. Daoism is passive. Confucianism takes action. Legalism is to take control and do what you can do. More violent and corrupted than the other 2. Legalists burned all other philosophical books. Killed scholars that didn’t do what they wanted. …show more content…
Legalism made the government sort of corrupted. Legalists burned down books and executed those who oppose them. This caused people to be angry with them. Nomads like the Xiongnu constantly attacked China making Qin Shihuangdi to start the great wall. Qin centralized laws, currencies, weight and measures, and sing language scripts.
Xunzi took the virtues of Confucian and went into work with the government.
There is the Confucian educational system. There was a university that was for students that wanted to work for the government. It wasn’t for people that like to study their whole
Silkworm farming was a technology they used for silk.
There was an expansion of iron metallurgy. Used for superior weaponry and tools that increase food production.
Daoism was a belief that one should be "at one with nature and the universe". It did not teach its followers that activism in political situations would change anything. It taught that one should let things be the way that they were and it would all come together eventually. Confucianism on the other hand, taught its followers that they should be active in political affairs. It also taught that one should be respectful to their elders, and that propriety was a necessary trait. Daoism is passive. Confucianism takes action. Legalism is to take control and do what you can do. More violent and corrupted than the other 2. Legalists burned all other philosophical books. Killed scholars that didn’t do what they wanted. …show more content…
Legalism made the government sort of corrupted. Legalists burned down books and executed those who oppose them. This caused people to be angry with them. Nomads like the Xiongnu constantly attacked China making Qin Shihuangdi to start the great wall. Qin centralized laws, currencies, weight and measures, and sing language scripts.
Xunzi took the virtues of Confucian and went into work with the government.
There is the Confucian educational system. There was a university that was for students that wanted to work for the government. It wasn’t for people that like to study their whole