The year 1996 in The town of Port Arthur in Tasmania, Australia, A 28 year old man named Martin Bryant started a killing spree. The massacre ended with the death of 35 men, women, and children, and 18 more severely wounded. Society is easy to blame at first glance, though there are always more complex issues at play. Martin Bryant was born into a fairly good family, unfortunately their parenting style soon became a struggle of trying to force Martin to be “normal”. Martin Bryant is proof that Society did not cause Frankenstein's creature to become a monster, it was his lack of an upbringing that caused him to kill.
Frankenstein’s creature came into the world as an intelligent adult, but knowledge does not teach you how to deal with your emotions, experience does …show more content…
Children in school didn't like Bryant and he often claimed they were bullying him and at first glance it would seem that society was to blame. As it turns out, like Frankenstein's creature they were scared of Martin, not for the same reason they were scared of Frankenstein's creature but regardless, their cruelty stemmed from fear. Martins iffy upbringing and the creature’s complete absence of one resulted in both of them responsible for the murders of innocent people. While martin never had a chance, frankenstein did, yes society was the last straw, but we all live in society and the majority of us don't murder so the idea that society creates a monster would make all of us a monster and yes we all have major problems whether we admit or even acknowledge them, they are definitely there. They don't make us monsters, There is always more at play, people are complex and there is never just one reason for our becoming a monster, though in Frankenstein's creatures case the major issue put in simple words was his lack of preparation for society, not society