Preview

Compare And Contrast Frankenstein And Martin Bryant

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
602 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Frankenstein And Martin Bryant
If society creates monsters then what are we
The year 1996 in The town of Port Arthur in Tasmania, Australia, A 28 year old man named Martin Bryant started a killing spree. The massacre ended with the death of 35 men, women, and children, and 18 more severely wounded. Society is easy to blame at first glance, though there are always more complex issues at play. Martin Bryant was born into a fairly good family, unfortunately their parenting style soon became a struggle of trying to force Martin to be “normal”. Martin Bryant is proof that Society did not cause Frankenstein's creature to become a monster, it was his lack of an upbringing that caused him to kill.

Frankenstein’s creature came into the world as an intelligent adult, but knowledge does not teach you how to deal with your emotions, experience does
…show more content…
Children in school didn't like Bryant and he often claimed they were bullying him and at first glance it would seem that society was to blame. As it turns out, like Frankenstein's creature they were scared of Martin, not for the same reason they were scared of Frankenstein's creature but regardless, their cruelty stemmed from fear. Martins iffy upbringing and the creature’s complete absence of one resulted in both of them responsible for the murders of innocent people. While martin never had a chance, frankenstein did, yes society was the last straw, but we all live in society and the majority of us don't murder so the idea that society creates a monster would make all of us a monster and yes we all have major problems whether we admit or even acknowledge them, they are definitely there. They don't make us monsters, There is always more at play, people are complex and there is never just one reason for our becoming a monster, though in Frankenstein's creatures case the major issue put in simple words was his lack of preparation for society, not society

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Chewy embodies a corporate ethos that resonates with me. For example, Chewy's initiative of supporting organizations that specialize in helping at-risk animals speaks directly to my ethical principles and philosophies. Chewy's refusal to forgo social responsibility is highly motivating, and I seek to propel this enthusiasm for the company forward in my work.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein is a book written in the early 1800’s that references technology that is just now being created. These technologies present the human race with a multitude of ethical issues that would not even have been thought of when this book was written. However, most are brought up throughout this book. Other ethical issues that have to do with this technology are also prominent in the story, although most of them originate from the creation of the monster. The monster is created by Frankenstein and it kills some of his close friends and family, but the retaliation by the monster stems from Frankenstein abandoning it after it was created.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One approach to this question would be to say that the creature in 'Frankentein' was himself the only monster. However, as we soon realise, the creature is benevolent at heart and only becomes monstrous due to the unjust way in which society treats him. The bleak, miserable world which Shelley portrays, full of hypocrisy, oppression and prejudice gains exposure through the depiction of the monsters 'fall from grace'. It is through the monsters suffering that he becomes truly monstrous. Shelley is suggesting that the creature's misdeeds are caused by the enormity of his suffering; at heart, he is essentially good. And, more importantly, essentially human. If he is monstrous, no one but Frankenstein is to blame. When the outraged creature demands of his creator, 'How dare you sport thus with life?' the question succinctly represents the sentiments of the reader, and perhaps even of the author as well. Frankenstein, in his hypocrisy, longs to murder a being who owes its life to him. If the creature is, paradoxically, both inherently good and capable of evil, then his creator is as well. The main cause of the monster's suffering rests with none other than Victor Frankenstein himself, whose actions at the monster's birth were surely monstrous also. To desert a newborn child is to defy one of the most fundamental elements of human nature. This shows Victor to be inhumane, and hence, monstrous. It is this inner monstrosity that is reflected in the creature's hideous visage. This exposes one of the novels key themes; Frankenstein is the monster's double. It becomes clear at this point that Shelley is making use both meanings of the word monster. In modern usage, the term 'monster' has come to mean 'something frighteningly unnatural of huge dimensions'. However at the time of 'Frankenstein's' writing its meaning was quite different. In earlier usage a monster is 'someone or something to be shown' Shelley uses both definitions in order to blur the fine line between what is…

    • 3698 Words
    • 106 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, people still recognize the ghastly, atrocious Frankenstein as a monster, but according to Deems Taylor’s Monster, Richard Wagner is the monstrous beast. Monsters are expected to be frightening like Frankenstein, but some monsters are real humans like Richard Wagner. Oddly, when comparing Frankenstein and Wagner--they certainly share some of the same grim features.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Murder is an act that is hated by all cultures, including the culture Mary Shelley lived in when she wrote Frankenstein. However, Shelley frames the violence the monster commits in a way that allows the reader to sympathize with the monster. This monster murders three people and causes the death of three others, but the reader retains sympathy for this monster due to Victor Frankenstein’s fault in the matter, his isolation due to society’s prejudice, and the fact that he begins his life inherently innocent, and repeatedly shows that he’s not just bad, but there’s also a good side to him.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Romantic era took place throughout the 19th century and held the belief that men demonstrate innate goodness, but civilization later corrupts them. Even in today’s society, many political figures, authors, celebrities, and athletes reinforce the Romantic idea of the natural goodness of man and the corruption of man by civilization as they initially exhibit pure values that succumb to the temptations civilization provides. Literature also reflects the belief of the innate goodness of man and the corruption of man by society. For example, Mary Shelley, entails these Romantic beliefs in her novel Frankenstein, in which both Victor Frankenstein and the Creature are born innately good but society later corrupts them. Victor’s,…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, she attempts to bring to light the dangers and the amount of responsibility a then new-found age of scientific exploration and discovery could bring to the table. When Technology and Power are used for self-beneficiary reasons, the process in which man tries to move forward with their pursuit of knowledge becomes complex, ending in the corruption of the self. In his attempt to make life, Victor unleashes a ‘Monster’ unto the world, oblivious to the responsibility it comes with. Being ignorant to this, and believing it to be a mere monster, he rejects any responsibility, sealing their fate in death.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -Frankenstein by Mary Shelley: Frankenstein’s monster is scared by outside society as much as they are of him, but in this way, the un-accepting nature of society is strengthened.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, misery and isolation compel the Creature to act rampantly against society’s moral standards. Despite being left in isolation, the Creature manages to hurt people while using misery as a justification for murder.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein and the monster that he creates are very similar. Frankenstein being a great man had his wants and needs even though he studied things that people thought to be ungodly and just wrong. Frankenstein creates the monster to be like himself although the monster has super human strength and is almost eight feet tall. Victor worked very hard trying to create the monster not noticing that he was creating the monster in his image.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No longer were monsters a product of supernatural forces, monsters were created. Yet, in order for a monster to become a monster, it cannot exist in isolation. Relating my idea of the connection between knowledge and morality in the Scientific Revolution/Enlightenment period to the monster and his body in Frankenstein, I argue that society’s knowledge of the monster is formed in one of two ways; one, through scientific creation or two, through social construction. Now, it is through (1) physical features which differ drastically from others or (2) immoral actions that one becomes a monster in their own society. In part, “monsters” are products of their own environment. What makes the creature in Frankenstein a monster is that he is both a scientific creation and his physical features and his actions of murder deviate from society’s expectations. Throughout the novel Frankenstein’s creation is never given a real name. Instead, he is called; a “demoniacal corpse, wretch, daemon, devil, monster, ogre, the being and creature” (36, 68, 102, 164, 165). Besides not having a name, Frankenstein’s creature is also described using the term deformity and monster. After society’s constant negative response to his physical appearance, the creature himself…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Humans are brought into this world with a clean slate some may say. They are untainted by impressions of hate, guilt, vengeance, or any other negative or positive human developed emotion. It is through social interaction and events that humans learn social behavior and how to cope with negative situations. The majority of the time, rejection, alienation, and abandonment will form negative emotions which can then lead to anger, hate and vengeance. Throughout Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein (1818), the theme of alienation through rejection and abandonment is presented continuously. The idea that violence, due to rejection and abandonment, to control Frankenstein is what the Monster tries to do. Not always is violence…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychologists have long debated the nature versus nurture issue in the shaping of our identities. Are we shaped by our biology or by our environment? This psychological debate is explored in Mary Shelly’s gothic novel, Frankenstein. The novel poses a simple question: Was Frankenstein’s monster inherently an evil creature, or was he made into a killer because of his environment? Shelly’s characterization of Frankenstein’s monster shows that the creature began as a clean slate, but was shaped into a monster by his experiences and isolation.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein’s monster is most frequently seen as, of course, a monster. He is fearsome naturally, but he has the mind and spirit of a developing human child. The creature’s youthful demeanor exhibits itself through many examples. The most prevalent childish behaviors he has are; the creature’s fear of being alone and seeking attention and love, being completely unbiased and not judgmental at the dawn of his creation, and his lack of knowledge of the world around him.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Frankenstein, he worked on his project so devotedly, and with such fever, that he fail to fully grasp what he was doing. In the end, he was horrified of what stood in front of him at the end of it all. He rejected it as a monster, and left it to fend for itself. In turn the creature, rejected by people and rejected by its creator, truly became a monster. This brings up an important question: How would things have turned out if Frankenstein had taken responsibility for his creation? Would it have killed at all if he had shown it love? Is there a chance it could have been accepted if he had taught it how to behave and integrate? At the time of its writing, this story urged us to use the processes that we discover responsibly, and take care of them. Nowadays though, it can be translated into an even more literal meaning. As the possibility of truly sentient machines is on the horizon, we should look to Frankenstein as an example on how to treat the life we create. We, not just as individual inventors, but as a society must be ready to take in our creations, and be responsible parents for our creations. We should show them love, and teach them what it is to be sentient in this world. If we are not, we risk what we make being the end of…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays