Preview

Compare And Contrast Gandhi And Martin Luther King

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
246 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Gandhi And Martin Luther King
A COMPARISON OF TWO GREAT LEADERS: MAHATMA GANDHI AND MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.?
© Lori Woitalla

Suggested Grade Levels: 2-4 Suggested Curriculum Areas: Social Studies and Language Arts Goals: To study M.L.K. and Mahatma Gandhi’s use of nonviolent protest. Objectives: Students will read about the life of Martin Luther King Jr. Students will view a slide show about the life of Mahatma Gandhi. Students will compare and contrast the lives of M.L.K. and Gandhi using a Venn diagram. Background information for teachers on Mahatma Gandhi: Please check out the Center for South Asia’s website http://www.wisc.edu/southasiaoutreach/lessons/figures/figures.htm

Lesson Outline Activities: 1. Read to the children one of the books on the suggested reading

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Two different writers, Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, argue that society is not at its finest and that every man has the responsibility to impact change and every many has the power to do so, only if man is an extremist for the greater good. King was a reverend but more importantly he was a dominant voice for thousands of persecuted people during the civil rights movement. From King expressing his knowledge and acting on them, he was obliged and jailed (he was obliged to jail?) within King's cell he composed a letter entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. (transition?) Thoreau was a philosopher who contained all the qualities of a transcendentalist. Much time before King’s letter, Thoreau fabricated a response to when…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chris McCandless was an ambitious soul, hitchhiking through life alone, moved by the beauty of nature. Mahatma Gandhi was an independence movement leader, and through non-violent civil disobedience, moved the world (“Mahatma Gandhi Bio”). Through the eyes of others, these two men were worlds apart, born for different purposes, with no clear connection between their actions. One man lived a lifestyle of solitude while the other constantly surrounded himself with family, friends, and followers. Although many would not string the two together, Chris McCandless and Mahatma Gandhi share their similarities through their journeys living outside the bounds of society.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Martin Luther King and Cesar Chavez came from very different backgrounds, their success as leaders of the Civil Rights Movement bears many similarities in its historic development. One major similarity between King and Chavez is that they were both great orators and made a number of notable speeches, which contributed to the social advancement of the minorities. King, who was ordained as a Baptist minister at the age of 27, was often put in the position to preach about what he believed in to large numbers of people. As a result, he was quite comfortable speaking to thousands at gatherings such as the historic March on Washington. Chavez, on the other hand, came from a poor migrant family and initially worried that he wasn't a good speaker. At the meetings he organised, Chavez often ended up doing more listening then speaking. However with time, his confidence grew as he found people listening and agreeing with what he had to say and so made many great speeches as did King. Their lectures and remarks made clear their selfless devotion to their causes and gave the blacks and Chicanos a new sense of worth and dignity which made them want improvements and change even more.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When you think of the past you might think about unfairness. During slavery and inequality of colored people fight for freedom,equality,and human rights. But two people stood out, Cesar Chavez and Mahatma Gandhi.They fought for two different things. Although they have a thing in common, they have both fought for human rights. Both of these people have made a huge impact in what they had believed in. Gandhi fought to relive his country of Great Britain. Cesar Chavez has fought for farmers right using non-violent approaches. They both fought for human rights but one of these men have fought better and made more of an impact on the world is Mahatma Gandhi. He has freed the whole country of India…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Williams and MLK had different opinions on how to deal with racism and segregation in America at the time. Williams thought did not agree with the pacifist approach to racism that MLK promoted. Williams wrote that “nonviolence is a very potent weapon when the opponent is civilized, but nonviolence is no match or repellent for a sadist.” On the other end of the scale, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee Statement of Purpose preached that love was what binds all people together and that love “goes to the extreme; it remains loving and forgiving even in the midst of hostility.” Then there was MLK who said a violent approach “will mislead Negroes into the belief that this is the only path and place them as a minority in a position where…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With many different views it is difficult to remember Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were both fighting the same war for the same people. King and Malcolm X fought the same battle using different methods. Both wanted to end racism and discrimination. King agreed with Malcolm X that Blacks had to love themselves. Both were instilled with a hope for a better day, society and world. King dreamed of a society of peace, freedom, justice, and equality. They became role models for African-American youth and achieved much with their efforts. They introduced self-pride to their people. Both methods were effective. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were both great men who died trying to make their home and country better but in the end both men’s…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction- This essay is going to be on the greatness of Martin Luther King Jr. and how he was part of civil disobedience. I am going to compare Martin Luther King Jr. to Booker T. Washington.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Malala and Dr. King Malala and Dr. King, though different in age and gender, were both enormously brave and persistent. Both Malala and Dr. King were threatened by death, but they stood strong and continued on with their crusades. Malala was threatened by the Taliban for speaking out against a girl’s right to go to school, and Dr. King was threatened for speaking out against racial inequality. Though they both fought for the same general idea of freedom, Malala and Dr. King did approach the idea of equality differently (blogging versus speeches), even though both were inspirational. These individuals are so inspirational, in fact, that both have a day named after them!…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Malcolm x and Martin Luther King Jr. are both powerful leaders. Malcolm X believed in violence and Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence. These two leader shared belief and hopes but they also had their differences. Malcolm X was born in Omaha, Nebraska on May 19, 1925. Malcolm did not believe in nonviolence or advocate integration. (Harold 610) He attracted black people’s attention and was eloquent, passionate, and a courageously out spoken champion of black people and a critic of American racism.…

    • 562 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mohandas Gandhi’s methods not only led to India’s independence from Britain but also had victories over racial discrimination in South Africa. Gandhi saw, upon his return to India from South Africa, that Britain had run India’s people into poverty and subordination. Indians were not allowed to manufacture or own their own salt. This affected the poor population most because of how often they used salt. Gandhi began by writing to the English Governor in India describing his plan to “convert the British people through nonviolence and [to] make them see the wrong they have done to India” (Document 1). He felt that the “British rule [was] a curse”. Even though Gandhi spent a total of 2.338 days in prison, he “did not feel the slightest hesitation in entering the prisoner’s box” (Doc. 7). People followed Gandhi in his protests and many followed him into jail feeling “firm in [their] resolution of passing [their] terms in jail in perfect happiness and peace” (Doc. 7). While he was in jail, Mme. Naidu, an Indian poetess, filled in his position in leading protests. She encouraged the protesters by reiterating that “[they] must not use any violence… [they would] be beaten but [they] must not resist…not even raise a hand to ward off blows” (Doc. 4). The author felt that “the western mind finds it difficult to grasp the idea of nonresistance”, but…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and the three thousand dead from 9/11, these two major events have drastically changed, not only American history, but as well as the lives of many Americans themself. Both King and the Trade Center can be seen as symbols of a new hope and peace for many Americans but tragically, the fall of both these symbols results in chaos for this progressing nation. With the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. in the Guardian’s “After the death of Martin Luther King: chaos or community” and the collapse of the World Trade center in Ian McEwan’s “Only Love and Then Oblivion”, the ideas of chaos and unity play essential components in each piece of writing through the aftermath of these senseless acts of destruction.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While MLK and JFK both had very nice, well put together speeches, they used different strategies and tactics. This was to fit the types of people they were soliciting their speech to. Generally speaking, MLK had a black or civil rights supporting audience. Since many of his audience members were black, many had low morale and were discriminated against. MLK spoke knowing this is how his audience was. JFK on the other hand, had a handful of different groups of people to please, being the president of the United States. He had to talk to the whole country and make sure that what he was saying would apply to everybody, in an official way. In regard to these facts about their audiences, both the president and MLK showed difference in the methods and tactics they used in order to appeal in the way they liked to their differing audiences. The first thing that is apparent in MLK’s speech, is the fact that in the very beginning, he tailors his words to fit what the “negroes” are happy to hear. He says, “We come here today to dramatize a shameful condition” (I Have a Dream Speech page 1 top half). His audience loved him before this speech for everything he had done with civil rights. Letting people know after the opening statement that he was going to address what was on every black man’s mind in the audience, was a smart tactic he used. He goes on to say even more of what people want to hear in order to rally them. One of his most famous statements in the speech was, “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character” (I Have a Dream Speech page 2 bottom half). This excerpt connects to many of the black audiences’ lives. These statements are tactful ones that were crafted to fit the audience. Continual rally of his supporters was the greatest effect of…

    • 1398 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    and understand which allowed him to build a rapport and gain their trust also led to the connection with Dr King and the audience. The audience members felt like they knew him even though they did not recognize him personally all these traits combined with the powerfulness in the compassion of his voice you could literally feel the Holy Spirit. All of these things combined allow Dr King the ability to move the audience in a way no one has ever been able to manage it.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    who was well-known in their area of Atlanta, while Malcolm X was a virtual nobody. One could probably say that Martin Luther King enjoyed the best that…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King had one statement that people connected with the African American people, the punch line stated, “I have a dream.” Not relating the two people because they are very different and all Americans unlike Trump hold King to the highest integrity. That being said, they are and were both prominent figures in society. Both prominent speakers had a message that they used to define their makeup. Trump has used his own rhetoric to the same effect and connects himself with the voters. Trump has used distinct message, which is “Make America Great Again.” During his campaign so far Trump has used, the language of the people. Malansky states, “Trump has a clear narrative, a master story that he sticks to”. He also goes on to say “He speaks…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays