He had a different perspective on the same issue. He believed that every man can reason. He believed the opposite of Hobbes. He wanted the King’s power to be limited and the same for the Monarch’s. He thought that people should be able to govern their selves without the King or Queen. He also believed people should be looked at as equal and the same. He was in favor of a monarchy and was not in favor of Divine Right. He wanted to protect the right of life, the right of freedom, and the right to property. He felt strongly about these rights. He wrote many things down, mostly about how the MEN are equal and making a new government would be the best for the
He had a different perspective on the same issue. He believed that every man can reason. He believed the opposite of Hobbes. He wanted the King’s power to be limited and the same for the Monarch’s. He thought that people should be able to govern their selves without the King or Queen. He also believed people should be looked at as equal and the same. He was in favor of a monarchy and was not in favor of Divine Right. He wanted to protect the right of life, the right of freedom, and the right to property. He felt strongly about these rights. He wrote many things down, mostly about how the MEN are equal and making a new government would be the best for the