Compare And Contrast Iroquois Constitution And Us Constitution

In the modern world, both the Iroquois Constitution and US Constitution pertain to many areas regarding personal and government affairs; however, one has almost been abandoned while the other is still alive and thriving. Both Constitutions are controversial; moreover, one can find many similarities and differences among them through the features of human equality, personal rights, and security of self and state. Each document has more to it than what meets the eye, therefore, by comparing and contrasting, an understanding is pursued through deep analyzation of the principles. The Iroquois Constitution fulfills a belief that all humans have the ability to become equal, at least if you affiliate with one of the clans. Within the Council of the Five Nations, several clans were assembled, each containing an abundance of policies and standards to withhold. Anyone was permitted to join if
Constitution describes defensive standards and protection towards the country as a whole. The 2nd Amendment states that the security of a free state must include a regulated militia and the right to bear arms for bearing arms (The Constitution of - U.S. 2). Individuals are allowed to own weapons for self defense purposes and when enlisting into a military branch, but do not necessarily have the right to construct an offensive attack on someone who has done no such harm to them. A secure nation can only be slightly guaranteed with strong soldiers and defensive weapons such as knifes, guns, bombs, etc. Although there are many rules that limit the people to what they are allowed to do and not do, security of the state(s) and people is drafted through the constitution itself. The amendments are a safeguard from the government; moreover, they are kept from gaining too much power and having the ability to strip freedoms from the people. Instead, foundation is provided for the government to keep things running