Creon and Oedipus are two very interesting characters. Their personalities, the way they ruled, forgiveness etc. was very unique to certain situations. In this essay I’m going to compare and contrast the two, and then decide whom I thought was the better ruler. Oedipus was seen as a good leader by the townspeople (Scene3.1468-1475). In the story he demonstrates the qualities any good leader possesses. For instance, when Oedipus learned the plague had spread through the town he instantly began trying to solve the problem before the town approached him with their fears. At the town meeting he notified them of his actions and re-assured them. Creon on the other hand, was seen as a poor leader. His ruling qualities are unlikable to say the least. Creon injects fear into his people starting with his first speech as ruler of Thebes. “Whoever refuses to adopt the soundest policies but fearing someone, keeps his lips locked tight, he’s utterly worthless. And whoever places a friend above the good of his own
Jaafar 2
country, he is nothing”. Additionally, Creon issues a decree to his subjects that anyone who gives Polynices with a proper burial would face death (Scene1.104). That decree proves Creon’s lack of sympathy for his town’s thoughts and beliefs. As you can see here Oedipus ruled Oedipus and Creon both had different leading styles too. Oedipus was honest, sympathetic, dependable, and determined. Creon on the other hand, as stated above, did not sympathize with his citizens. He ruled with fear and violence instead of Oedipus who ruled with honesty, sympathy, dependability etc. Despite their different ruling styles they did happen to share some similarities. They both ruled with pride, they were both proud of the way they ruled no matter if what they did was good or bad. Sometimes they were even so proud, that they were blind to the flaws in their leading. Oedipus and Creon also had a run in where Creon says “I am told that heavy accusations have been brought against me by king Oedipus” (Scene2.486). Oedipus and Creon both ruled Thebes with stubbornness. When they had an idea set in their brains they would not change it. They both had firm beliefs in their ideas. For instance, Creon sentenced Antigone to death, since she was the person who gave her brother, Polynices, a proper burial. Despite warnings from the townsfolk and Tiresias himself; Creon went through with the death sentence by sealing her in a cave. His stubbornness led to defiance of the gods, which eventually caused his downfall as King of Thebes. Oedipus on the other hand had good intentions. His goal was to save the people of Thebes from the plague by removing the murderer. Oedipus was stubborn though and refused the clues, which revealed where the plague came from. Later in the play Oedipus finally overcomes his stubbornness and accepts the truth that HE was the source of the plague and being the good leader he was remained true to his word and banished himself. As you can see Oedipus and Creon have their differences and similarities, but in my opinion I think Oedipus was clearly the better leader.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Creon’s tragic flaw, however, was his inability to bend or yield to the views and ideas of others, or the god’s. Creon’s inflexibility led him to be more of a tyrannical leader towards the city of Thebes. Towards the…
- 258 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Although Creon created the edict with good intentions for the people of Thebes, his failure to recognize the familial bond that ties Antigone to her brother Polyneices coupled with his newfound power as ruler of Thebes contributes to his tyrannical and delusional behavior which ultimately leads to his downfall. Looking back at “Oedipus The King”, Creon established himself as a rational individual, especially during his confrontation with Oedipus when clearing his name as culprit in a placid manner. However, Creon’s attitude shifts dramatically in “Antigone” after assuming the throne. Analysing Creon’s argument with oracle Tiresias reveals Creon’s transformation into a delusional tyrant. Tiresias offers his wisdom to Creon claiming he is responsible…
- 257 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The consequences at the end of each play relate overall back to the matter of denying a truth that is above man. Oedipus and Creon in Antigone and Oedipus Rex respectively portrait a character that would have traits like an average Greek would. Both have a lot of pride in their person and believe that they as men have a lot of power. Oedipus expresses his power in his quest for the murderer and Creon expresses his by inciting an ordinance that violates the spiritual beliefs of some. Both characters as well are warned by a prophet, meant to depict the spiritual world or ultimate truth, but still deny the truth and the consequences the prophet warns of. These together ultimately leading to their downfall. Socrates believed very strongly in the presence of a universal truth and it is mirrored very clearly in these works of Sophocles. With the many Greeks who would come to the theatre to watch these famous plays, it would seem illogical that none of the audience would be affected by the deeper message in the play. Although many people supported the views of people such as Socrates and Sophocles, the culture as a whole could have benefitted from the views being the most popular. Maybe, but just maybe, Greece would still be today as it was in the golden age if they would…
- 1992 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Consequently, Oedipus can no longer be called a tyrant, let alone a king, after being humiliated in this way, unable to see or even walk without assistance. His attitude toward Creon also seems dramatically altered when the new king approaches Oedipus, who implores the audience: "Oh no, what can I say to him? How can I ever hope to win his trust? I wronged him so, just now, in every way. You must see that-I was so wrong, so wrong". In this way, Oedipus, who greatly humbles himself before Creon…
- 90 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
While Oedipus was slightly innocent to his faith, and Antigone was trying to do the right thing, Creon had negative cause and effects. After Antigone was put into a prison, the blind seer Teiresias visited. He told Creon that his reaction to Antigone’s “wrong” is extremely rash and the gods have unleashed their fury. Creon takes no heed to the advice and inturn insults Teiresias and the Gods (232). His pride doesn’t allow him to see the future and understand his mistake. When he does acknowledge it, it is to late to save Antigone, for she had already died in her cell. The Gods, with their fury against Creon, made both Haimon and Eurydice commit suicide, asserting the point that pride causes downfall. If Creon had listened to the blind seer earlier and truly regret his mistake, or even better allow Antigone to bury her brother’s body, than this malediction wouldn’t have been placed upon…
- 389 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Creon purposefully tries to convey the message that he is all knowing and knows exactly how to run a kingdom. His one big decision is to instruct that no one’s gives Polyneices, son of the late ruler Oedipus a proper burial. To communicate this message, he first appeals to false authority, then uses sentimental appeals, and lastly by comparing Polyneices to his brother,…
- 671 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Oedipus left Eteocles and Polynieces with his power over Thebes but the did no handle this well. The brothers killed each other which is how Polynieces died. At King Creon's request, no burial will occur. Anyone who expresses sadness of Polynieces death or tries to bury him will be stoned to death.…
- 618 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
As a result of his uncertainty and lack of knowledge, Oedipus’s actions become brazen and unjust. Showing his lack of knowledge of all the facts, he accuses Teirisias and Creon of conspiring to dethrone him, even though they are innocent. Creon tells Oedipus, “If you think that stubbornness without sense is a good gift you are not wise” (126). Here, Creon points out Oedipus’s rash judgment and persistence, yet Oedipus continues to be stubborn. Oedipus’s refusal to stop and admit that he is wrong exemplifies his hubris and contributes to his…
- 691 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the powerful relationships that continuously develops throughout the play is that of Oedipus and Creon. This relationship begins when Oedipus becomes king and shares his power equally between his wife/mother, Jocasta, and Jocasta’s brother Creon. The conflict emerges between Oedipus and Creon when Oedipus brings in Tiresias to assist him in finding the murderer of Laius, and Tiresias tells Oedipus that it was in fact he (Oedipus) who killed Laius. One of Oedipus’s reactions towards what Tiresias tells him is that he says, “Creon! Is this his conspiracy his or yours?” (Sophocles, Ln. 431) Oedipus’s jump to reach this conclusion of blaming Creon, is what causes their relationship to deteriorate and is the reason that later on in the play, Creon and Oedipus get into a fight about this accusation. Once Oedipus has blinded himself, he actually begs for Creon’s forgiveness, for Creon to exile him and for Creon to take care of his two young daughters, Antigone and Ismene. “Drive me out of the land at once, far from sight, where I can never hear a human voice.” (Sophocles, Ln. 1571-1572) This is probably the most emotional relationship in the play, and it is a perfect example of why all people enjoy this play. Relationships such as this one have helped Sophocles’s play tremendously with regards to it being one of the most…
- 1231 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Creon had to face his niece, son and wife all dead as a catastrophe at the end of the story for enforcing the laws of execution upon Antigone. “O horrible… Is there no sword for me, To end this mister?” (Sophocles 16) This quote represent great magnitude and the result after the catastrophe of the death of his son and wife. It shows the feelings of Creon and how terrible he felt, to the point where he felt to commit suicide. Oedipus faced catastrophe but did not face the same amount of magnitude as Creon. Oedipus tried his best to avoid outcome of the prophet and tried to escape his fate my leaving his city, little did he know that they man he killed as the crossroads was his father. “At last the whole, terrible truth had come out. All the oracles had been right: Laius had been murdered by his own son.” (Bennet 2) When he found this out, they also realized that his wife was actually his mother causing her to kill herself. The catastrophe is really tragic though he abandons his kids and Creon faced greater…
- 864 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Creon's noble quality is his caring for Antigone and Ismene when their father was persecuted. Creon is a very authoritative person and demands control of others. When talking to the Chorus, Creon does not ask them to agree with the decree but demands that they follow it. Creon expects loyalty from others. It is apparent that Creon is very dominating and wants to be in control. "The man the city sets up in authority must be obeyed in small things and in just but also in their opposites"(717-719). Through this quote the reader realizes that Creon wants obedience in everything he decides even if he is at fault. "There is nothing worse than disobedience to authority" (723-724). Further supporting Creon's belief that everyone shall remain faithful to him even if he rules unfairly. This is proved true when Creon says, "Should the city tell me how I am to rule them?" (790).…
- 1446 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Both, Oedipus and Creon have similar characteristics and flaws. However, it was Creon’s hubris that eventually results in his inability to deal with situational conflicts. On the other hand, Oedipus, ironically, curses himself to his own miserable doom. They both behave with a shared trait of ignorance towards the reality of many situations. In addition to, hubris Creon and Oedipus share the character trait of arrogance. As well as arrogance, Creon and Oedipus react similarly to Teiresias’ visions of their future; “No doubt. Speak:/ Whatever you say, you will not change my will.” (5.73-74). As Teiresisas reveals Creon’s fate, it…
- 746 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
rapidly, it may not be indicated by the script that it has changed, and was most…
- 1033 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Oedipus, who was “sick at soul” eventually “tore the brooches from the robe of his dead wife and ground the pins into his eyes” (Bennet, Kerr, 3). As a result of this action, it is shown that Oedipus, filled with guilt and shame, imposes his own punishment on himself by abolishing his sense of sight. Through this, Oedipus clearly demonstrates how high the degree of remorse he feels is. On the contrary, when Creon becomes informed of the deaths of his own son and wife, he asks aloud “Is there no sword for me, to end this misery?” (Sophocles, 16). In this scene, Creon wishes to end his misery by killing himself as well, but as the story comes to a conclusion, it is speculated that Creon in fact, does not sentence himself to death. He imposes to only to be led away, to dwell for the remainder of his life in his own kingdom. It is here, that the true distinction between Oedipus and Creon shows. Oedipus, undeniably showing more remorse brings blindness and exile upon himself, compared to Creon, who only decides to reside within his home to live forever in sorrow. Unmistakably, through their self-imposed retributions, Oedipus demonstrates a higher level of remorse when compared to…
- 923 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In Ancient Thebes Oedipus and Creon are both appointed to be kings of Thebes at two different times. These men were both once great and highly respected rulers, but both make mistakes that cause them to have tragedy in their life. These leaders both contributed to the unfortunate events in their lives, but one of them for the disasters that meet them. Oedipus is more responsible than Creon for the tragedies in his life because of his quick temper, poor judgment, and his imperiousness that leads to destruction.…
- 856 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays