Movies and books are always different; in a movie you can show multiple characters, and in most books you're stuck in one character's narrative. For instance in the book The Giver the character Fiona doesn’t care about Jonas as deeply as she does in the movie. In the movie she stops her injections, and she starts to love Jonas. However in the book she only “enjoys having Jonas’s company”. In the movie she also helps Jonas steal Gabe before he is killed, and she is put in the community jail for helping him. Before she is going to be released she talks about how she has felt things. That she knows what it is like to truly feel, and in the book she isn’t this unorthodox.…
for instance in the book color is something the people of thier town had to give up and in the movie it was mostly black and white until jones got his seeing beyond also in book and movie.…
The theme of freedom is examined in both texts, the giver, and Harrison Bergeron. The giver shows us that freedom is critical to learning and to happiness. We see the consequences of sacrificing freedom for perfect equality. For example, Jonas is selected and forced to become the receiver of memory. He receives a range of memory from the giver and this enables him to question the structure of his community and ultimately the lack of freedom. In comparison to Harrison Bergeron, we see a different way in which the authorities restrict freedom. George has been given an ‘ear radio' that eject uncomfortable sounds every time he has critical thoughts. In both texts, their freedom of choice has been taken away from them.…
The Giver is a book about a totalitarian government that controls its people by outlawing colors, pets and many things we take for granted today. In the dystopian society of “The Giver”, there are many differences from our modern society, some being the age system, the “family units”, and the economy and employment…
Would your actions be changed based on the community you live in? The Giver by Lois Lowery, The Last Dog by Katherine Paterson, Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut and The Monsters are Due on Maple Street by Rod Serling, all shows characters in hard situations being affected by their community. There is no rule book for running a community, so when making decisions, it is hard to keep everyone happy. Restrictions, rules and suggestions of others may lead someone to react in a certain way when in a difficult state. With strict rules to follow in many of these stories, characters rebel, revolt, or attempt to leave, after having enough of the community around them.…
Imagine a word with no love, no affection, and no biological families. Well in the dystopian society in The Giver by Lois Lowry. This is their everyday life, which makes the protagonist Jonas wonder why is this the case. Jonas’ society and modern day society have close to nothing in common. While Jonas’ society is emotionless, experiences sameness, and does not have choices, Modern day society consists of love, celebrates individuality, and has freedom to choose.…
In The Giver, the citizens in Jonas’ community are living in a dystopian world due to the fact that they do not possess any freedom nor rights as a human in the community for the greater cause.…
“No one in the community was starving, had ever been starving, would ever be starving.” (Lowry 89). The Community in The Giver is called a utopian society, what is a utopian society? Webster Dictionary says, “an imaginary place in which the government, laws, and social condition are perfect...” Even though they may be “perfect”, utopian societies never really work out, and usually people have to take risks in order to change the society. In the novel The Giver by Lois Lowry, Jonas takes risks by, helping family members, doing what he thinks is right, and helping friends see the truth.…
Just imagine a world where everything was the same all the time. Every day, the weather as plain and ordinary as the clothes you wear. This is the world perceived in The Giver. The Giver is a story of a boy named Jonas living in a dystopian society where everything is the same; the people, the homes, the weather. Though they have eliminated all fear, pain, war, and hatred, they have also eliminated choice. But when Jonas is chosen as Receiver, he must fight to bring choice, passion, joy, and love back to the hearts of his community. This type of society differs from modern society. The culture of current-day varies from the novel’s as well as its structure and values.…
The sledge knocked in the hill and Jonas was jarred loose and thrown violently into the air. He fell with his leg twisted under him while he could hear the crack of his bone. His face scraped along sharp edges of ice when he lay shocked with fear. Then he felt the first wave of pain. It was like a hatchet lay lodged in his leg, cutting through each nerve with a hot blade. He tried to move but couldn’t because the pain grew. He screamed and turned his head and vomited on to the frozen snow.…
Dragons, witches, princesses and knights. These are the imaginary friends in so many children's lives. For young adults, those fairy tale characters give way to darker characters and more realistic situations. However, what do they all have in common? The live in short stories. Two short stories that are interesting are "The Cask of Amontillado" by Edgar Allen Poe and "The Giver" by Lois Lowry. They seem like very different stories, but they have more similarities than you think.…
Freedoms of hair color, religion, sexuality, where they live, the career they want to pursue, etc.. In ‘The Giver’, they don’t have any of that. Every person is more or less the same. They have no self-think, self-worth, or individuality. Everything they do is an instruction starting as early as birth. As said by The Giver in the book, “It’s the choosing that’s important, isn’t it?” Jonas was frustrated that he didn’t have the choice of whether or not he would wear a blue tunic or a red one. The strange thing was, it didn’t really matter to Jonas would color of tunic he wore. It was more important to him about having options to choose from. The freedom of choosing gives one empowerment. The government should not create a society where individuality and the right to choose freely is stripped away. It goes against the constitution, and everything that this brass country symbolizes. America is looked upon by other countries as a free land; a free land with opportunities. By conducting such communities with restrictions on everything, the country won’t be looked upon in a positive manner. Other countries may start something similar because of our country's bad example. This is yet a reason why constructing such communities would…
I have recently read the novel The Giver, by Lois Lowry, and watched the movie Pleasantville. These works focus on making perfect societies. The Giver is about a boy named Jonas who lives in a community with many rules. He is assigned the job of the Receiver of Memory and goes through great amounts of pain and happiness during his training. Pleasantville is about David and his sister Jennifer who goes into their TV to a show called Pleasantville. This town is supposedly peaceful and pleasant. Although The Giver and Pleasantville are both about perfect societies, their characters, setting and the symbolism establishing their greater involvement.…
“If work and leisure are soon to be subordinated to this one utopian principle- absolute busyness- then utopia and melancholy will coincide: an age without conflict will dawn, perpetually busy- and without consciousness.”-Gunter Grass. Living in a perfect world is not worth giving up your choices. Without our choices, there would be several necessities missing from our human lives. Having a perfect world would eliminate a true family unit, a graduation, and a job.…
2. It is difficult for us to imagine a world without color, personal freedoms, and love, but in the giver, the society relinquishes these things in order to make room for total peace and safety. Consider the pleasures and experiences that our own society discourages in order to preserve the public good (certain recreational drugs, for example.) In the context of the lessons Jonas learns in the giver, explain why we should or should not sacrifice an orderly community in order to allow individuals more spiritually or sensually satisfying experiences. Where do you think the line between public safety and personal freedom should be drawn?…