The Odyssey, is a legendary tale written by David Adams Leeming. This epic tells the story of a wise man named Odysseus who struggled to return back to his homeland, Ithaca, after the fall of Troy. In comparison to the text, the movie "O Brother Where Art Thou," has a similar plot and is based on The Odyssey. In the movie, Ulysses Everett McGill is the main character played by George Clooney. Everett and Odysseus both encounter different struggles in their journeys throughout the movie and the book; however, both characters ' main goal was to be reunited with their families back home.…
Knocked Up presents the audience with real life issues that society does not speak about in most cases, and this is not a bad thing. It raises awareness, and allows the viewer to examine and question the themes brought up in the film. Although screwball romantic comedies are continuously watched by older generations, they are a thing of the past, and Knocked Up, and other similar films, are now taking center stage in the genre of romantic comedy--whether older generations accept them or…
Another big difference between the two movies is that in the first movie, "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner", is that the fiancé never lied to the parents, about his job, his career, and so forth. While in the opposing movie, "Guess Who", the fiancé Simon Green lied since the first moment that he arrived at his future parents-in-law's home. For example, Simon lied about having a…
In the first scenes of both films it becomes quite apparent that both female protagonists’ husbands face some sort of trouble. This hinders them from playing the role of the breadwinner for the family. Qiu Ju’s husband is injured as he was kicked in the groin by the village’s political head. The injury not only cost him his health but also prevented him from working which incremented to the medical fees. Ermo’s husband, who is impotent and sick; cannot work due to physical problems. As you can see both males would stay at home while, the females would go out and try to earn some money. This shows how the gender roles in both films contrast the traditional ideals of men and women. As you may have already noticed, the similarities are beginning to show for the protagonists; they will face many hurdles throughout the film. One concrete similarity is how the protagonists’ names are in the titles of the films.…
Another aspect that both movies have in common is that they are much more true when it comes to showing the reality of African Americans in the 50s and 60s. The scenes where the journalist travels through hitchhiking are very intense because they show the attitude of white men towards black men, their perverse fascination over the subject of Afro American men lust after “their” women. It unmistakably pictures how they…
In the play when Betty finally wakes and calls for her mother, Abigail says that she is dead but seems calm and nice when she says it, but in the movie Abby tells Betty that her mother is “dead and buried” by yelling at her slapping her when betty yells back. This shows us how cruel Abby is really supposed to be. Another difference from the characters is that all of the girls gang up on Mary Warren in a separate room and then come to accuse her after while in the play they just start to accuse her during court. These differences allow us to see the true natures of the Characters in the play than just reading and misinterpreting how they are supposed to be when they say certain…
I have recently watched a movie called High Noon and just read a short story called "The Most Dangerous Game." High Noon came out in theaters in 1952 and is about a Marshall who has four criminals who want revenge on him for putting one of them in jail. It has cowboys and gun fights in the Old West. "The Most Dangerous Game" came out in 1924 and is about hunting and the main character surviving all by himself. Both of these stories are very well told and partly have suspense. They might have a lot of similarities but they also have many differences in the two main characters, conflict, and the theme.…
Usually Hollywood portrays the inequities of classes by having the rich class being portrayed as good people and the ragged, poor people as being portrayed the bad people. For the movie “Treasure Island” is a perfect example of that, they had the rich class supposedly “discovering the treasure” and the poor people supposedly “stealing the treasure”. But in Michael Parenti’s interpretation of inequity classes of “Pretty Woman” the rich man was obliviously from the rich class, but he was also not really that good of person because he already had a girlfriend and still managed to scoop up a prostitute for his short business trip, and the prostitute was obviously low class and doing her job, whatever prostitutes do, she was portrayed as bad person as well because she was a prostitute and low class. The two were destined to be together because they both had issues, neither was really pointed out as good or neither was portrayed as bad.…
“Hello, Dolly!” and The Matchmaker are different because they have different characters and a couple of different places where the scenes take place. In the play there is Malachi Stack, Miss VanHuysen, Joe the Cabman, and the cook. In the movie none of these characters show up. Then they also go to Miss. VanHuysen’s house in the play but…
Yet looking closely, we can see how the girl has changed her perspective. Her intentions seem to be completely different than the man. We can assume that the couple have not settled down because of the girls statement about what they do, “That’s all we do, isn’t it- look at things and try new drinks”(116). We can also suggest that they travel quite frequently when the narrator claims, “He did not say anything but looked at the bags against the wall of the station. There were labels on them from all the hotels where they had spent nights”(118). Through the remarks of the girl we can assume that by keeping this baby instead aborting would allow her to settle down with the man. She also began to stand up for herself as she repeatedly tells the man if he can please stop talking.…
But as they talk about it, the woman becomes more disheartened and basically concedes to her boyfriend. Showing how that woman didn’t really have a say in their relationship. At which we could infer that they were going to go their separate ways even if they had the operation or not. As she struggles with her relationship with him trying to be happy with him but can’t come to terms that their relationship has already ended that it was a matter of time before she decides to leave. As such both show similarities how woman face limitations on how what they can or cannot do in their day and…
Bridesmaids is a terrifically funny, smart, and emotional ensemble comedy. Some may say it’s the female version of The Hangover, while others may think it’s quite similar to Bride Wars. This movie pulls off the amazingly uncanny trick of being both brutal and gentle at the same time. I highly recommend this movie to all audiences over the age of 17. The unexpected truth of being a bridesmaid is revealed, but in the end, Kristen Wigg (Annie) persuades you that there is a greater light at the end of the tunnel. Despite the chaos, lifelong friendships end up being what truly matters.…
The father and son relationships in "Penny in the Dust" by E. Buckler and ""The Father" by H. Garner, have many contrasts and similarities.…
Call it The "Bridesmaids" Effect: Ever since the R-rated 2011 comedy became a runaway hit … a rash of female-written comedies are enticing viewers with provocative new characters who are more like women we know.…
Both are set in the distant future, in a community devoid of color, feelings, and choice. The plot is recognizable, but it has been changed quite a bit. Of course, some action needed to be added to the movie, since the book had almost none, but all of that action took away from the book's original ambiguous, philosophical feeling. It is understandable, though, since this movie appealed to a mostly teen or young-adult audience, that staying one hundred percent true to the book would not work. Also, most of the changes in the movie had a reason. For example, during their ceremony, Asher and Fiona were assigned Pilot and Nurturer, as opposed to Assistant Manager of Recreation and Caretaker of the Old. Asher and Fiona's new jobs would be useful later in the movie. When Jonas needed to take Gabe from the Nurturing Center, he would need a Nurturer who worked there to help him. Also, when Jonas was escaping, a pilot would be asked to find and get rid of Jonas. Jonas's escape in general had a lot more tension than it did in the book. Jonas and the Giver planned Jonas's escape for a while in the book, and only mildly altered the plan by taking Gabe. In the movie, Jonas's escape was spur-of-the-moment. Jonas's escape in the book was thrilling because of our built-up compassion towards him and our uncertainty of whether or not he and Gave would live. In the movie, that thrill was generated by the close call between Jonas's escape and Fiona's almost-release. Both methods were effective. But the reason that the latter method worked was because of the relationship between Jonas and Fiona. In the book, Jonas's feelings for Fiona were minor and not mentioned very much; rather, they were used to help the reader realize what the Community took away. In the movie, those feelings were blown up into a full-on love story. These feelings were useful to the movie's plot: The fact that Jonas and Fiona had…