Howard Zinn A Peoples History of the United States Chapter 1: Columbus, the Indians and Human Progress Can historians avoid emphasis on some facts and not others? Historians are selective, they simplify and they emphasize what they believe is important and gloss over other things they view as less important. “This distortion is ideological; it is released into a world of contending interests, where any chosen emphasis supports (whether the historian means to or not) some kind of interest, whether economic or political or racial or national or sexual.” p.8 This emphasis assumes that everyone has the same goals and viewpoints.…
In Ward Churchill’s “History Not Taught is History Forgot: Columbus’s Legacy of Genocide”, depictions of the European’s genocide and greed are numerous. Christopher Columbus nearly caused the extinction of the native Taino’s people. He used slavery as the premiere method of extinction. Upon his arrival, the Taino’s population ranked eight million. When he departed, that number had dwindled to 100, 000. His successors carried on his policies, and the natives were further decimated to a mere 22, 000 in the year 1514. By the year 1542 they were reduced to 200 individuals, rendering them virtually extinct. The consequences of Columbus’ policies indirectly led to an absolute extermination of an entire culture.…
While Paul Johnson focuses on the accomplishments of the colonists, Howard Zinn’s work is more focused on the atrocities the colonists committed. Howard Zinn starts out his novel with the innocent Arawaks greeting Columbus with a bountiful amount of gifts to which Columbus responds selfishly by demanding they show him where the gold is located. After that, things rapidly decline. Zinn proceeds to highlight the enslavement and harsh treatment of the natives by Columbus and the ruthless genocide of the Indians.…
Not all scientists introduce the exact same conclusions in a specific research. Although Zinn talks about Christopher Columbus committing a genocide, Schweikart and Allen think otherwise. Some people, including Schweikart and Allen, believe that “native health was on a ‘downward trajectory long before Columbus arrived’” (Schweikart/Allen P.1 Paragraph 3 Line 2-3). Considering this statement, Schweikart and Allen’s response to Zinn is very opposed and unrelated. Schweikart and Allen both believe that Columbus did not commit mass murder. They both believe that we should honor Columbus. They talk about what Columbus did was recognizable and in the title Schweikart and Allen refer to Columbus as a patriot which is a very positive…
“Columbus, The Indians, and Human Progress” from A People’s History of the United States. By Howard Zinn…
Native American history taught in school usually is based around Indians traveling across the Bering Strait and living in minor, secluded tribes. Evidence now suggests that these teachings are not entirely true. In Charles C. Mann’s “1491”, Mann writes about Native Indians advancement in agriculture and its population, as well as how the Amazon rain forest might actually be a human artifact and how Native Indians are the reason behind it.…
In chapter one, "Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress" the reader is informed about early Native American civilization in North America and talks a little bit about the Bahamas. Zinn talks a great deal about the genocide that Christopher Columbus and his crew committed along the way. In this chapter we also discuss Pizaro and Iroquois. In this chapter the author quotes Columbus numerous times and I personally think that shows that his opinions rest in the hands of Columbus. I think that In Zinn’s writing you can see the biased opinions that he has. When I read this book I get the feeling that Howard Zinn believes his opinions are the only ones that matter; it seems to me that he is very cocky in his writing. Zinn’s views on things like Columbus are very different from the average writers.…
Native Americans had a significant impact on Europeans as early as America's discovery in 1492 (Kennedy, Cohen, and Bailey 14), during which time, the Columbian Exchange occurred. This initial exchange had a larger influence on Native American life than European, as the Old World explorers introduced diseases to which the Indians had no natural immunity (Yazawa, Melvin 46). According to Kennedy, Cohen, and Bailey (15), in the Centuries after Columbus' landfall, as many as 90 percent of the Native Americans perished.…
In David A. Stannard's book, American Holocaust: Columbus And the Conquest of the New World, Stannard discusses the cruelty he says Christopher Columbus inflicted upon Native Americans and how it was comparable to the genocidal acts of World War II. This debate arose roughly thirteen or so years ago, and before then people thought Columbus could not have possibly done something so horrific. However, there is evidence to support the claims, and the idea that Columbus may have been crueler than previously believed is becoming less and less taboo.…
Europe was a continent emerging from the darkness of the Middle Ages. The people had endured a long period of war, disease, and general strife. Europe was emerging from the Middle Ages with a new sense of confidence and self-worth. Europe’s achievements, however, led to ever increasing confidence. Christopher Columbus’s “The Journal of Christopher Columbus” documents his actions taken in the Americas as well as insight into his thoughts at the time. When Christopher Columbus came into contact with the Native Americans, he would unknowingly perpetuate a European attitude of superiority. Even out of kindness, Christopher Columbus believed that the Native Americans were like…
Whatever their numbers, the Indian population suffered a catastrophic decline because of the contact with Europeans and their wars, enslavement, and especially diseases like smallpox, influenza, and measles. Never having encountered these diseases, Indians had not developed antibodies to fight them. The result was devastating. Indians would engage in the ritual sacrifice of captives and others, sometimes thousands at a time. This practice reinforced the Spanish view of America’s native inhabitants as barbarians, even though in Europe at this time, thousands of men and women were burned at the stake as witches or religious heretics, and criminals were executed in public spectacles that attracted throngs of onlookers. Hernán Cortés was the first explorer to encounter a major American civilization. It was the Aztec empire. Cortés conquered the city. A few years later, Francisco Pizarro conquered the great Inca kingdom centered in modern-day Peru. Soon, treasure fleets carrying cargoes of gold and silver from the mines of Mexico and Peru…
Columbus forced labor on them, which led to unsanitary conditions, killing many (Source 4). Those who could not handle the harsh conditions of Columbus’s labor were killed, and those who survived lived to suffer another day. Columbus harmed the health of hundreds of Native Americans, and should not be held up for it. Not surprisingly, Columbus’s forced labor caused many health conditions as well. Malnutrition was common in the people (Source 4). Because of Columbus’s harsh labor conditions and little food, the native peoples suffered from insufficient diet illnesses. These horrible health circumstances were horrendous, and Columbus is not worthy of appreciation for it. Continuously, Columbus’s greatest health impact on the Natives was what he brought with him from Europe, disease. Because the Native Americans had not adapted to European culture, lifestyle, and environment, when Columbus came bearing all these attributes, the Natives were highly affected and suffered for it. The diseases that Columbus and his men were somewhat immune to had an effect on the Natives and caused various health problems, diseases, and death. Specifically, the contagious disease known as smallpox, was spread, and “killed millions of of Native Americans” (Source 2). The diseases caused by Columbus should not be praised, which is what America is doing by celebrating Columbus Day, and that day should therefore cease to exist.…
The European nations all had at least one thing in common when they came to the Americas and that was to increase their wealth. The Europeans thought of themselves as bold, fearless, and heroic explorers that sailed across the Atlantic Ocean to discover a new kind of world. The Native Americans believed the Europeans were ruthless marauders. The truth is that both the Europeans and Native Americans’ viewpoints were right. The Americas were unknown and nonexistent to Europeans until their courageous explorers braved the crossing of the Atlantic to find it.…
The first Native Americans to arrive in North America arrived twelve thousand years ago. 1 They traveled across what scientists and historians call the “land bridge” that spanned the distance between modern day Russia and Alaska. The natives separated into many different factions and fanned all over North America; some tribes became nomadic roaming wherever their food supply went while other natives learned to grow and sew crops. The Native Americans lived in mostly peaceful societies until 1492, when Columbus landed on what is now the Bahamas2 The natives greeted Columbus and his crew with open arms only to be met with harsh treatment, slavery, rape, and death. When the Europeans arrived, they forever changed the lives of Native American’s by trying to transform religion and law that violated Native American customs. When Columbus, a Roman Catholic, landed in the Bahamas in 1492, he was received amicably by the friendly Arawak tribe. The Arakwak people were a largely peaceful society; they had settled in the Caribbean hundreds of years before European explorers found them. In Columbus’ private journal he wrote of the Arawak “ they willingly traded everything they owned...they do not bear arms, and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance...with fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want” 3. These natives were known for their hospitality and friendliness; they openly traded all of their goods with the white men. This was especially odd to the Europeans. They had just left a continent ruled by kings and popes all in a mad scramble for power and money. Columbus’ notes their hospitality as a weakness and openly writes about enslaving the natives that only wanted peace with the European explorers. Columbus’ first order of business with the natives was to take “some of the natives by force in order that they might learn…
In " A People's History of the United States ", Howard Zinn approaches his view on history in a more opinion based way. Howard Zinn beings by retelling the encounter between the natives and Columbus. Zinn's view of this is different from the traditional encounter most historians talk about. Howard Zinn points out that the Europeans came to the Americas in search of slaves and gold and brutally killed almost all the Indians, who according to many other people were a peaceful people. This shows that Zinn is subjective and doesn't view Columbus as an "enlightened " explorer but rather a brutal one that would do anything such as torture others to get what he wants. Then Zinn gives his opinion on how history is usually told from the Elite groups point of view. Zinn points out that Columbus thought the Natives were weak and wouldn't be able to defend themeselves. Howard Zinn does give facts about the encounter such as using Columbus own journal as evidence but he does become biased in certain parts of the first chapter. In other words , Zinn wanted to tell the Natives pov because he…