Comparing Ed And Deb Sharpio's Hypothesis

Ed and Deb Sharpio’s hypothesis states that,” If your heart says that you should do or believe something, then you should do or believe it.” To me, this is wrong.
When you first hear their hypothesis, it doesn’t seem so far fetched. We were always told as kids and sometimes even now as young adults to “listen to you heart.” Countless songs, books, and stories convey this message, though I don’t think they meant it as literally as the Sharpios’s. If one were to take what Ed and Deb say literally and really think about what that means, you come to realize that it is morally wrong.
“A man goes to the supermarket once a week and buys a chicken. But before cooking the chicken, he has sexual intercourse with it. Then he cooks it and eats it”(Hadit,
Right? No. If the Shapiro hypothesis were true, the man would be doing no wrong as long has he is following his heart. This man having sexual intercourse with a dead chicken every week could easily spread diseases, potentially putting the man and whomever he encounters sexually at risk. Not to mention the chicken did not give consent, and you shouldn’t have sex with anyone unless it is consensual. Any sexual acts towards animals is a crime. But that isn’t the reason it is unjust. It is unjust; therefore there is a law against it. But, If the Sharpio hypothesis were to be true then if the heart desires something, it must be right. His heart desired to have sexual intercourse with the chicken, therefore the man is right. That statement is false. So, we shouldn’t believe the Shapiro Hypothesis. “Julie and Mark, who are sister and brother, are traveling together in France. They are both on summer vacation from college. One night they are staying alone in a cabin near the beach. They decide that it would be interesting and fun if they tried making love. At the very least it would be a new experience for each of them. Julie is already taking birth control