Preview

Comparing Hobbes, Locke, And Rousseau's State Of Nature

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
714 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Hobbes, Locke, And Rousseau's State Of Nature
What does it mean to be in state of nature? The idea state of nature has no definite meaning because it is perceived differently by different philosophers. Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau each discussed state of nature and why political societies had to established. To understand the views of each philosopher about the state of nature we first have to understand what they think about human beings in a natural state. Hobbes believes humans to be fearful of death, wretched and in constant war with one another. Locke believes humans to be perfectly free and have morals. Thus, people in Locke’s state of nature have some kind of rights called natural right whereas, Hobbes believed beings in the state of nature to be a moral, meaning there is no right or wrong. Rousseau believes human beings to be “Noble Savages” and free and equal. Rousseau is the …show more content…

Locke believes the state of nature to be a place of equality and justice because everyone has the same power, no one has more than someone else and everyone has the same advantages of nature. People have perfect freedom in the bounds of laws of nature. There is a governing force in Locke’s state of nature preserves liberty, life, and possession. Laws of nature are in place to ensure everyone is able to practice perfect freedom and anyone who tries to break the boundaries they are punished. Locke says to have perfect freedom does not mean to have license. Thus humans have the capability to reason they want to improve their lives and they do that by obtaining property. Anything that is previously unclaimed can be can be improved by one’s efforts then that becomes the person’s property. Locke states a rational person will try to do the right thing and wont disturb else. Also when an individual acquires property they should leave some for other because unlike Hobbes he doesn’t think people are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For the past many years, people have been trying to figure out the relationship between the government and nature of man. The theories of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau about the connection between nature of man and the government have been debated for many years. These three philosophers have remarkably influenced the way our system works today. Although each theory had its flaws and merits, Jean Jacques Rousseau’s theory is superior in comparison to Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After analyzing how Locke and Hobbes understand the state of nature it is evident that they share many ideas but they also show essential differences in their ideas. Hobbes regards the state of nature as a state of war, in which natural law is established only after a process of reasoning. This process leads men to the conclusion that they must somehow find…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Also Locke thought that people share the same natural rights, which are life, liberty, property. Life is referred to people fighting to survive. Liberty means that people want to be as free as possible to make their own decisions. Property represents the fact that people want to own things that help them survive, such as land and food and tools.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke begins his argument with the point that if property is to be used, then it must be appropriated and “…another can no longer have any right to it…” prior to the property being able to “…do him any good for the support of his life.” (p.19, $26) For a person to survive, one must have his or her own private property to obtain the necessary resources for survival. The common property of all mankind becomes private property when it alters from the state of nature where the property is naturally occurring. The next question pertains to how common property removed from the state of nature is private property.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Locke’s’ piece, Of the State of Nature Chapter II, he emphasizes the positive views of human nature. Locke supports a no-government form of rule. He believes that man can rise above injustice and keep a fully functioning society without rule or as he puts it they can have “A State of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit…..” (Locke). If you give man the freedom to make his own decisions and choices he will make the correct ones. Freedom of choice is what is needed to keep a society intact and functioning, individuals in a society need to feel as if they are in charge of their own destiny. The natural rights of life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness are backed up by the notion of freedom and choice of…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Locke believes that before we form civil society by consenting to establish government, we live in a State of Nature. He describes this pre-political state as,...a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending on the will of any other man. (Locke, 1980, p.81)The State of Nature is ruled essentially by human nature. Liberty, equality, self preservation, reason, and property are the most prominent principles that Locke feels are innate to humans. Locke explains how nature intended for all men to be equal,...creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same facilities should be equal amongst another... (Locke, 1980, p.8)Locke comes to the conclusion that humans are self preserving in the State of…

    • 4014 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many philosophers, such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, have discussed over the years if he human race is naturally good or evil. People than choice their side of the argument, one side believing that humans have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society, while the other side believes that humans have a bad nature that is kept in check by society. As John Locke believes that the human race is good, it is reasonable to accept as true because we are born neutral, with free will, and fear of a higher power.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When it comes to State of Nature, Locke writes in his Two Treatises of Government,“...a state of perfect freedom of acting and disposing of their own possessions and persons as they think fit within the bounds of the law of nature...The natural state is also one of equality in which all power and jurisdiction is reciprocal...” (Lonang Institute; State of Nature §4). Men are freely allowed to do whatever is necessary as long as there are justifications for their actions and to see that everyone around them is just as equal as themselves. Along with his State of Nature is Locke’s belief of Social Contact: “individuals in a state of nature would be bound morally, by the Law of Nature, not to harm each other in their lives or possession… individuals would agree to form a state that would provide a "neutral judge"...an impartial, objective agent of that self-defense, rather than each man acting as his own judge, jury, and executioner...”(Social Contract-Wikipedia). In other terms, man must form a government that they entrust their lives with by giving them support and power, and in return, the government must protect the people from hurting one another by being the objective factor in the justice system. Finally, in the State of Man, Locke claims that “at birth, the mind was a blank slate or “tabula rasa”... born without innate ideas, and that…

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assuming command of any Army organization presents a number of challenges a commander must be prepared to confront. Leaders must be cognizant of the “mental shift” required when moving into the position, and how he may execute the principles of mission command. Furthermore, commanders must fully appreciate the need to accurately assess the organization he’s been charged to lead. It so happens, history provides numerous examples of senior officers succeeding and failing in these endeavors. A critical analysis of LTG Matthew Ridgway’s command of the Eight Army and their success during the Korean War highlights these two concepts.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper, I will analyze both Hobbes’ and Rousseau’s view on the Nature of Man. Through my analysis of both, I will show contrast and comparison between both philosophical views. I will identify and explain the central aspect of the Nature of Man as identified by Hobbes and Rousseau and will make connections through a series of explanations and examples that were presented by Hobbes and Rousseau.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke was an English philosopher and is believed to be one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers. 17th-century Locke introduced the philosophy that humans agree to a social contract that allows the government to efficiently conduct society in harmony with natural law. He believes that without the control of the government, people would not behave in an acceptable manner and corrupt society. On contrary to the government, he felt the people should have the right to remove the government if they felt their natural rights were being threatened. Under natural law are natural rights. “Natural rights hold that because individuals are human beings capable of rational thinking and moral behavior, they are due all the rights one would have in the natural state.” Therefore Locke believed that all individuals are inherently good and created equally. This means individuals should innately be given natural rights which include: life, liberty, and property.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first sight, Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government, seemed quite similar to Hobbes’s Leviathan. They both believed that a state of nature is a state that exist without government. They believe that men are created equal in this state, however Hobbes argues that because of self-preservation, man possessed the desire to control over other man. Locke, on the other hand, reasons with a more peaceful and pleasant place.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “In the blink of an eye everything can change.” These words perfectly describe the short story “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin. In this short story, Mrs.Mallard’s world is turned upside down when she finds out that her husband has died. Within that hour Mrs.Mallard’s life continues to drastically change as she comes to realize that she is free to live her life how she wants. Mrs.Mallard only grieves the loss of her husband for a little while then she can’t help but say over and over that she is free. Although Mrs.Mallard was going to be sad at Mr.Mallard’s funeral she was looking forward to the coming years where her years would belong to only her. Despite the fact that Mrs.Mallard quickly got over her husband’s death her life changed…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 103 Final

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1D. The state of nature is Hobbes’ description of what human beings lived like prior to the existence of a state or civilized society. In this existence, all humans were equal in that they all wanted to achieve their ultimate end and they all had the right to do what they thought necessary for survival…

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hobbes credits to each person in the state of nature a liberty right to preserve herself, which he terms “the right of nature”. This is the right to do whatsoever one sincerely judges requiring for one's protection; yet because it is at least possible that virtually anything might be judged necessary for one's protection, this hypothetically limited right of nature becomes in practice an unlimited right to potentially anything, or, as Hobbes puts it, a right “to all things”. Hobbes further assumes that people should accept what they see to be the necessary means to their most important ends.…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays