Preview

Comparing Locke And Hobbes Of John Locke

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
428 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Locke And Hobbes Of John Locke
Imagine a world where people get to take part in their government everywhere, where it is equal

and everyone has freedoms and rights, where it’s fair. Unfortunately, it doesn’t always turn out like that.

There is too much hatred in the world for the government to let us do that everywhere. The government

has too much power over the people. Government should be fair and everyone should be treated

equally. One philosopher thought that we should be caring and treat each other equally, and that was

John Locke. Government should be run how John Locke argues because, the government should be

fair, run where people have rights and freedoms, and provide equality for all.

People should be able to control their lives and have a say on
…show more content…
Unlike Hobbes, Locke thinks

that people are all made equally.

Government certainly should be fair to people. People should have rights and freedoms, the

government is just ruining all the natural rights people have. John Locke argues,“nothing was made by

man to spoil or destroy.” (Locke) Locke has shown that this omnipotent system should be fair, the

government should not be able to ruin our freedoms. He also states that we are all made equally, therefore we should be.

We should treat all fairly without any quarrels or contentions. In an interest of politics, John

Locke proposes that “considering the plenty of natural provision there was a long time in the world and

few spenders there could be little room for any quarrels or contentions.” (Locke) Locke is so certain

that people should all be on one level no one is any higher than the other. Locke has also explain that if

you treat people equally then there will be no problems. Therefore, everyone should all be on one level.

Lastly, the government should be some type of fair agreement between the people and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Whap CCOT Study Guide

    • 523 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ● John Locke stated the if rulers did not protect the life, liberty, and property of the…

    • 523 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and to not be under…

    • 573 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Locke claimed that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification his view on political government. the result? " A social contract where people in the state of nature can conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government, this is in order to better ensure the stable, enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and right to own property."(Schmidt…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cmc 240 Final Project

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “To secure these inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, governments are instituted among men, deriving their powers from the consent of the governed…Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their safety and happiness.” - Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence, 1776.…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page

    Throughout history, people have debated about what government is, and what is the purpose of it. Should the government dictate people's lives and tell them what to do? Should the government be permissive and just allow the people take care of themselves and not step in? Should there be an in between? Two very influential philosophers from the 17th century Enlightenment, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, are preeminent influences on how people see what a government is and what role it should take. They both were renowned influences in many governments, even to this day. Locke took the side that people are naturally good, and that they should rule themselves. While on the other hand, Hobbes said that humans are naturally brutish and evil,…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The philosopher Locke, on the topics of morality and justice, writes that: Besides the crime which consists in violating the law, and varying from the right rule of reason, whereby a man so far becomes…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Paper PHL Kloke

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lowe, E. (2013). The Routledge guidebook to Locke 's Essay concerning human understanding. New York: Routledge.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke was an English philosopher and is believed to be one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers. 17th-century Locke introduced the philosophy that humans agree to a social contract that allows the government to efficiently conduct society in harmony with natural law. He believes that without the control of the government, people would not behave in an acceptable manner and corrupt society. On contrary to the government, he felt the people should have the right to remove the government if they felt their natural rights were being threatened. Under natural law are natural rights. “Natural rights hold that because individuals are human beings capable of rational thinking and moral behavior, they are due all the rights one would have in the natural state.” Therefore Locke believed that all individuals are inherently good and created equally. This means individuals should innately be given natural rights which include: life, liberty, and property.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sh3 23 2.1

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Treating people equally does not necessarily involve treating them all the same. Our policies, procedures and activities must not discriminate but must never the less take account of differences of life-experiences, outlook and background, and in the kinds of barrier and disadvantage which people may face, in relation to:…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is the time and time again old saying does the tree falling in the woods make any sound if no one is around to hear it hit the ground. This question has plagued mankind for an undetermined amount of years many even centuries. No one is for sure of the questions origin however the question itself is the important factor not the origin. There has been many debates over the issue. I choose to use simple logic and reasoning close to the same as John Locke would of thought and try to make a reasonable agreement.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Locke, the purpose of a government is to help people achieve equal natural rights. The government is obligated to defend and protect its citizens. However, the government must rule with the consent of the people. Also if the citizens have given their voluntary consent, they must support and obey a government that has claimed power. The citizens are obliged to obey the government if it has established legitimacy. However, one cannot be obligated to obey the government unless one has…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke argued that a legitimate government would be validated through the consent of the people it governed and protected, specifically the protection of a citizens natural rights of life, liberty, and estate. He also believed that citizens had the right of rebellion in the event that a government was acting against the rights and interests of its citizens, ultimately allowing those governed to replace the government with another in the interests of the people. Locke believed that the state of nature was that of happiness due to reason and tolerance. He argued that all people are equal and had no right to harm another's "life, liberty, or possessions." The state was formed by social contract because in the state of nature each was his own…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The next part of the passage questions why a man would ever want to leave the state of nature of freedom to be controlled by a higher power. Locke makes the argument that without a higher power or form of government man’s life and property could be in danger. A government could help secure freedoms and safety. In the state of nature many things are missing including a common law, no indifferent judge to determine differences, and a power to promote law. Men must create and agree with a form of law to make mankind peaceful with one another and punish those who fail to follow the law. Freedoms need to be protected by law.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Life in the state of nature is insecure because without government there is no single authority to determine what the law of nature demands and to enforce those demands. All men being equal, each is entitled to enforce the law of nature and to punish transgressors. Locke thought that the disadvantages of this are obvious: men's…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Locke Dapl Analysis

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages

    According to Locke, “We must consider, what state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions and a state also of equality, wherein power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one having more than another”, (Locke, p. 8). Perfect freedom and equality…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays