Preview

Comparing Perception In Oedipus The King And A Doll's House

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1121 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Perception In Oedipus The King And A Doll's House
Men are often believed to be the wisest, strongest, and more intelligent of the two genders. In narratives they are often shown to be compelling and brilliant. However frequently coupled with man’s brilliance is a trait of ignorance. That is just the case in the play, “A Doll’s House” by Henrik Ibsen; and in the tragedy, “Oedipus the King”. In “A Doll’s House”, the main male character is man by the name of Torvald Helmer. Torvald’s dominance over his wife, Nora, is repeatedly shown throughout the play. Torvald adopts the belief that a man’s role in marriage is to protect and steer his wife. He clearly enjoys the idea that Nora needs his guidance, and he interacts with her as a father would. Ironically, Torvald seizes all the power in the marriage …show more content…
How people perceive you can often influence your words and actions. In both “A Doll’s House” and in “Oedipus the King” perception is a driving force behind the characters actions. Torvald and Oedipus are both very conscious of how they are perceived amongst their peers, or subjects. In “A Doll’s House”, after Nora pleads with Torvald to allow Krogstad’s position at the bank to be reinstated Torvald’s response is Krogstad would, “make him a laughing stock of him before the entire staff”. This illustrates how Torvald prioritizes his appearance over the request of others. Another example exemplified in the play, “A Doll’s House” is Torvald’s reaction to Nora’s dishonesty. Torvald condemns Nora’s character, and says she ruined their family’s happiness. Yet when she presses to leave, his main concern is to uphold “the appearance” of their household. In “Oedipus the King”, the citizens of Thebes hold Oedipus upon a pedestal due to him saving the city in years past; but now that a plague has rocked Thebes the citizens view of King Oedipus is shaken. Oedipus responds to their distress saying, “Here I am myself—you all know me, the world knows my fame: I am Oedipus…You can trust me, I am ready to help.” Oedipus attempts to mold a positive image of himself by alluding to his past success and explaining that he is willing to do anything for his subjects. Both characters understand that how people perceive them …show more content…
Oedipus is seen to have a very open and exposed life style. He doesn’t object if others know about his personal affairs; he actually invites them. This is expressed when Creon has traveled back from Delphi with news from the god, Apollo. Creon states that he feels this is a private matter and should be spoken within the concealed walls of the palace. Oedipus then opposes stating, “Speak out, speak to us all. I grieve for these, my people; far more that I fear my own life.” Oedipus feels that his bare lifestyle will make him seem inviting as a king, but what he doesn’t understand is citizens shouldn’t know everything that is going on in the government. Censuring to an extent can prevent anarchy. This is opposite of Torvald’s life style. Torvald has more of a closed off and intimate life style. He doesn’t feel the need to express his personal affairs to anyone, not even his own spouse. In “A Doll’s House”, it seems whenever a situation becomes tense and uncomfortable Torvald retreats to his office to get away from the situation. This is made known when Krogstad and Nora get in a heated argument over her debts. This quarrel is right down the hall of Torvald Helmer, but he is oblivious because he is in his study. This seems to be Torvald’s true weakness. It is his ignorance to the things in plain sight. The differences in of the two characters seem to be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Oedipus was not only known to behave aggressively in “Oedipus Rex” but also to have aggressive speech as well. In the first drama, the king of Thebes was shown to speak harshly to others who had done nothing to him (Fitts and Fitzgerald 17). In “Oedipus at Colonus,” Oedipus was shown to be kinder when he spoke. When Oedipus told the Chorus his name, the Chorus wanted him to leave the country immediately due to his “family curse” (Fitts and Fitzgerald 98). Despite this however, Oedipus spoke kindly to the Chorus and asked then of the promises that were made towards him (Fitts and Fitzgerald 98). Oedipus also spoke kindly to the King of Athens, Theseus. The son of Laius spoke to the king of Athens with great respect. When Theseus told Oedipus his actions were childish, Oedipus asked Theseus to get to know him first (Fitts and Fitzgerald 118). Oedipus’s aggressive speech changed upon realizing the mistakes made in “Oedipus Rex.”…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Oedipus the King" by Sophocles has been considered one of the greatest Greek tragedies. It is a Greek myth that may have been inspired by real events and people. With that thought in mind this play has indeed, help us get a better understanding of Aristotle's, a philosopher, thoughts of a Tragic Hero and Sigmund Freud's, a psychoanalytic theorist, thoughts on the affects of the same on our lives (especially male children and their psychological development). Both Aristotle and Sigmund Freud also belief that Oedipus was not in control of his actions, but in fact, was acting in a manner that was a part of his fate.…

    • 556 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Oedipus the King the protagonist Oedipus is portrayed to be very powerful and all knowing, almost god-like. By Oedipus acting this way he becomes very arrogant, which is his tragic flaw because due to his supercilious behavior this leads to his downfall. During Oedipus’s conversation with Tiresias, the blind prophet, Oedipus does not like what he has to say about his parents and his up bringing and becomes ignorant and says “I did not know you’d talk stupidity, or I wouldn’t have rushed to bring you to my house” (1324, Sophocles). Through this quote readers can see that Oedipus only listens to what he wants to hear, otherwise it is a waste of his time. Nora from A Doll’s House is naïve however in her own way she can be arrogant as well when it comes to money. When talking to her old friend Mrs. Linde she remembers that she is now a widow, but instead of asking how everything is with her and making sure she’s ok, Nora goes off to tell her all about her husband’s promotion at the bank. Nora says, “Just fancy, my husband has been made manager of the Bank…not only what one needs, but heaps and heaps of money” (1763, Ibsen). Her timing to tell Mrs. Linde about her husband’s job is very untimely and through her way of talking she is portrayed to be foolish when it comes to money and finances, which leads to Nora getting blackmailed. Looking at the two…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An ideal marriage consists of communication and honesty, but in A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen the Helmer marriage is quite the opposite. At the beginning of the play, Nora conformed to obeying her husband and she was naïve in hoping that her husband would sacrifice his reputation for her. She even forged a check to borrow money from the bank to help Helmer with his illness. She thought that this would be a good way to show her love and ability. Their weak marriage later revealed that Helmer never really understood her and he was ashamed that she had concealed this secret. This event awakened Nora’s true personality and she finally realized that their marriage was fake and weak. In the play A Doll’s House, Henrik Ibsen uses symbolism to portray how Nora is forced by societal norms to mask her true personality through her lies and secrecy, which shows her transition into an independent woman, further emphasising that self knowledge is needed for an authentic life.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although ruling with an iron ego, Oedipus has the admirable qualities that a leader of any place would and should possess; he has a deep devotion to the Theban population, “whose fame all men acknowledge” (Sophocles, 8). At the outset of the play, Oedipus’ intentions were honorable; he was determined to find Laius’ murderer and went to such lengths to end the plague on his people. His intentions were there and good. As a man of such noble status, he was dedicated to his people. Despite his dedication and apparent likability, it is his immense pride that disallows him from seeing his true nature: a hot-tempered, proud and cocky individual who ends up, in a paradox, blind as he “sees” the truth that he murdered his own father and has married and procreated with his mother, however unaware of that fact he was. Even in seeing his own truth, no pun intended, Oedipus begs for exile as a way to escape his cursed family; he asks his brother-in-law Creon to protect his daughters/half-sisters Antigone and Ismene in a move of selflessness counteracting his normally proud…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Oedipus the King Oedipus was a very strong willed confident man. He was a great leader, though at times he showed hubristic characteristics. He like to brag that “[everyone] knows [him], the world knows [his] fame,” (Oedipus the King. 7) and that he was the greatest person. He also thought the he was the most powerful man. These hubristic characteristics are what arguably led to his downfall. This was Oedipus’s tragic flaw. He was not humble by any means in this first book, but in the second book that all changed. After Oedipus could see the truth, and realized that his prophecy of killing his father and having children with his mother came true, he blinded himself. He wanted to escape what he could see (metaphorically) so he blinded himself (physically). In Oedipus and Colonus, Oedipus was old, weak, and weary. He was humble and pitied himself. He had to rely on his daughter, Anitgone, to guide him and care for him wherever he went after his exile. He has faith in the gods and realized that they are always watching you and know if your faith has faltered. In the first book he thought that he could prove the oracle wrong and show that the gods were not always right, but in trying to outrun his prophecy he caused it to happen. He changed drastically mentally and physically because of this. He lost all of his pride and was only full of pity. Also, he gouged his eyes out to try to escape seeing the truth.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oedipus Vs Creon Essay

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    People began to get irritated with Oedipus and think differently about him when he acts sing-minded. One man was trying to help Oedipus figure something out, and Oedipus was not wanting to hear of his wrongs the man said to him:”You blame my mood and see not your own Which overcomes you; no, you’re bothering me”(lines 347-348). What is spoken to Oedipus shows how the one speaking, is irritated that Oedipus is blaming everything on others and not considering of what he could be doing mistakenly. Oedipus did not like to hear people's opinions on matters of his life; he only wanted people to believe what he thought to be true. While speaking to Oedipus a man says: “Your words, O king, are ill-spoken” (Oedipus The King 334) By saying this, he is doing his best but struggling to show Oedipus how ignorant he is being and how he is breaking up relationships with other by not listening to what people have to say about him. Oedipus is not intentionally trying to ruin his relationships with others, but his pride keeps him from repenting from his wretched…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Doll’s House, by Henrik Ibsen, portrays a young married woman, Nora, who plays a dramatic role of deception and self-indulgence. The author creates a good understanding of a woman’s role by assuming Nora is an average housewife who does not work; her only job is to maintain the house and raise the children like a stereotypical woman that cannot work or help society. In reality, she is not an average housewife in that she has a hired maid who deals with the house and children. Although Ibsen focuses on these “housewife” attributes, Nora’s character is ambitious, naive, and somewhat cunning. She hides a dark secret from her husband that not only includes borrowing money, but also forgery. Nora’s choices were irrational; she handled the situations very poorly in this play by keeping everything a secret. The way that women were viewed in this time period created a barrier that she could not overcome. The decisions that had the potential to be good were otherwise molded into appalling ones. Women should have just as many rights as men and should not be discriminated by gender; but they should also accept consequences in the same way without a lesser or harsher punishment.…

    • 3445 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oedipus, as a king, was both caring and conceited. He talked as though everyone should know his name but at the same time worked to solve the illness that plagued his people. As an investigator, he was harsh, determined, and at times mean to the ones that he…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Oedipus the King” by Sophocles follows the tragic fall of king Oedipus who falls to the terrible will of the gods that he is never able to escape. Although Oedipus himself was a king, Miller’s adaptation of tragedy still applies to the tragedy in this play. In his essay Miller goes into depth on the subject of the hero’s tragic flaw. Miller describes the tragic flaw as a part of one’s character that doesn’t necessarily affect them but can come out in times of difficulty. Oedipus’s tragic flaw was his inability to ignore his pride and unwillingness to listen.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This reveals that Holden and the people of his time period view women as objects, only present to entertain and serve men. Yet it is not women who need to change, it is men who need to be less manipulative. In a Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen, when Nora tells Torvald that she has forged a signature, he only worries about himself, and how Nora’s actions will affect him. When Nora understand that she must leave in order to be her own person, Torvald says that he has it in him “to become a different man” but “can’t understand” the idea of his “doll” being taken away from him (Ibsen 70). Torvald is yet another example of man's belief that they are above a woman. Boys and girls are indoctrinated as children to believe one sex is better than the other, when in reality, they are all…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pride In Oedipus The King

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Throughout this play Oedipus shows too much pride and arrogance toward everyone that he comes across. He always has to have the last word. He does not care what effect the outcome of his words and actions will later have on…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen was first performed in 1879 when European society strictly enforced male supremacy over women. The play consists of a middle class couple, Torvald and Nora Helmer, who seem to have the perfect marriage, three children, and a pending respectable income with the husband’s recent promotion to bank manager. Torvald treats Nora like a doll, manicuring and manipulating her looks and actions. Although his controlling demeanor is concealed by innocent nicknames and monetary allowances, the affects of his domination over his wife are eventually exposed. At the end of the play, Nora leaves in a haze of anguish after her husband fails to defend her when she is accused of legal fraud in a loan she had taken to save Torvald’s life. Some people say that Nora was right to leave and flee the control of her demeaning husband to seek her individuality, but many argue the contrary when considering what she left behind, what she could have demanded and changed at home, and what she would face as an independent woman defending herself in a 19th century, male biased society. Although some may assertively argue that Nora was right to leave her home, others suggest the she was not right to leave considering the abandonment of her children, the responsibility she could have demanded from her husband, and the prejudice against independent women in her society.…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jocasta, like Creon, warned Oedipus of what he would soon discover, but being an ignorant man, Oedipus did not listen to his wife’s wise words. Oedipus’ emotions grabbed a hold of him as he tells his Queen Jocasta: “Oedipus: This “best” of yours is starting to annoy me” (Line 1073). Jocasta also saw that Oedipus was burdened with an angry look, and asks him: “Jocasta: Please for the gods sake, Lord, explain to me/ the reason why you have conceived this wrath?” (Lines 702-703) It was after that very moment when the truth about Oedipus true being…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In A doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen, the main character Nora is part of a very successful marriage. Her husband, Torvald, has a very economically stable job therefore making it unnecessary for Nora to work. However, Nora is not treated as a Woman. On the contrary, she is being portrayed as a doll. “Is my little squirrel bustling about?”(1282). He often speaks to her in a superior voice making his dominance known in their relationship. She decides to take matters into her own hands by leaving her husband after she is blackmailed by Krogstad for borrowing money from him. During the time period in which this play has taken place, it is frowned upon to disobey a man. However she goes the extra mile and leaves her responsibilities as a mother.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays