Comparing Stoker's Dracula Undermines The Idea Of Good And Evil
The Monsters We See Are Actually Our Reflections:
How Simulacra in Bram Stoker’s Dracula Undermines the Idea of Good VS Evil
“The monster is not outside but within…,” said John Paul Riquelme. Riquelme’s quote gives the impression that there are always two sides to every coin. Each individual is more than their outer appearance. Humans are an imperfect mixture of both good and bad. According to Jean Baudrillard, simulacrum or simulacra is essentially the representation of something or even a certain person. In Bram Stoker’s Dracula, Dracula himself can be seen as a simulacra for humanity because he represents the bad side of humanity while the human’s simulacra is a representation of both good and evil. This idea of what good and evil exactly …show more content…
The most prominent double that validate how Dracula is a representation of human evil and humans as the double edged sword is between Van Helsing and Dracula himself. Van Helsing is an illustrious doctor sent to take on Dracula. Dracula is the evil while Van Helsing is the representative of all the good in the world. As an authoritative figure in the story, Van Helsing has a thirst for power among the other characters. He feels the need to always take the lead. Dracula is similar in this way, in he has a thirst for blood. His thirst for blood grants his authority over their personal choices and freedoms. For example in Chapter 23, Van Helsing takes control over Mina when he hypnotizes her to try and track Dracula’s movements. In this way, Van Helsing has complete control over Mina. Dracula and Van Helsing use forms of mental manipulations to get what they want. Dracula has a direct mental connection to Mina. Their similarity is apparent when Van Helsing compared himself to Dracula. Van Helsing said, “our old fox is wily; oh! So wily and we must follow with wile. I too am wily and I think his mind in a little while” (Stoker
How Simulacra in Bram Stoker’s Dracula Undermines the Idea of Good VS Evil
“The monster is not outside but within…,” said John Paul Riquelme. Riquelme’s quote gives the impression that there are always two sides to every coin. Each individual is more than their outer appearance. Humans are an imperfect mixture of both good and bad. According to Jean Baudrillard, simulacrum or simulacra is essentially the representation of something or even a certain person. In Bram Stoker’s Dracula, Dracula himself can be seen as a simulacra for humanity because he represents the bad side of humanity while the human’s simulacra is a representation of both good and evil. This idea of what good and evil exactly …show more content…
The most prominent double that validate how Dracula is a representation of human evil and humans as the double edged sword is between Van Helsing and Dracula himself. Van Helsing is an illustrious doctor sent to take on Dracula. Dracula is the evil while Van Helsing is the representative of all the good in the world. As an authoritative figure in the story, Van Helsing has a thirst for power among the other characters. He feels the need to always take the lead. Dracula is similar in this way, in he has a thirst for blood. His thirst for blood grants his authority over their personal choices and freedoms. For example in Chapter 23, Van Helsing takes control over Mina when he hypnotizes her to try and track Dracula’s movements. In this way, Van Helsing has complete control over Mina. Dracula and Van Helsing use forms of mental manipulations to get what they want. Dracula has a direct mental connection to Mina. Their similarity is apparent when Van Helsing compared himself to Dracula. Van Helsing said, “our old fox is wily; oh! So wily and we must follow with wile. I too am wily and I think his mind in a little while” (Stoker