Preview

Comparing The Prince And The Discourses

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2318 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing The Prince And The Discourses
Many political philosophers agreed that there is a correlation between moral goodness and legitimate authority until Niccolo Machiavelli came along. He believed that there is no moral basis on which to judge the difference between legitimate and illegitimate uses of power and this is why he is one of the most controversial philosophers who ever placed pen to paper. Machiavelli was born on May 3, 1469 in Florence, Italy. He was brought up in a family of public servants and rapidly developed a strong interest in politics. Overtime he began his government service during the Medici family’s exile. When the Medici family returned to power in 1512, he was imprisoned for some time. During his time in jail, he created The Prince and some parts of The …show more content…
Throughout both of these works his opinion of using violence when needed has never changed. In the Discourses he states that if you need to resort to violence in order to seize power so you can reconstruct the constitution of a city so that it fosters political liberty, go for it. (Machiavelli 1994,129). Likewise, in The Prince Machiavelli justifies the use of violence by stating that it can be used in the interests of safeguarding the state (Machiavelli 1994, 48). He makes this bold statement since he believes people are by nature envious and this bad nature stops them from making reasonable compromises and decisions even though those decisions could actually be in their best interests (Machiavelli 1994, 82). He goes on to claim that although everyone wants freedom for himself or herself, they will always have feel the need to oppress others for reasons like jealousy. Knowing this, he suggests that you must be willing to fight since cruelty cannot be avoided all the time. However, he makes it clear that it is not acceptable to commit random acts of violence. Although advocating cruelty may label Machiavelli a teacher of evil, we must keep in mind that he advocates for it since he believes everyone has the ability to be cruel and since everyone is self-interested, violence is the only answer in situations. That view is evident in today’s society where we recognize that people are much quicker to criticize than to praise what others have done for the reason that they never want someone to be better than them. If they feel like someone is better than them they get jealous and may end up causing harm. He further discusses this in book one of The Discourses when he states people can easily become corrupted and think about engaging in cruel acts no matter how good and polite they are (Machiavelli 1994, 139). People can be easily

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of Machiavelli’s standards for rulers of a country is to be focused on warfare by claiming, “A prince ought to have no other aim or thought, nor select…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli isn’t necessarily a teacher of evil because of his courtesy to educate others about past history and persuade people to think differently. We are shown from the Prince that although Machiavelli does have an admiration for ones fortune and skill (virtue). Although there is a set of controversial approaches that he tries to suede people in a position of power to adjust themselves. With this we can learn that although there is to be some success in the mist of violence shown through his teachings it shows that although it is unnecessary and will cause the people who are innocent to retaliate against their administration. Machiavelli also mentions some key past princes who have misused their power.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli’s most famous book, he writes to prospective “new princes” on how to be as successful as possible, without taking into account the morality of any of the actions. For example, in chapter 15, he writes that “it is necessary for a prince, if he wishes to maintain himself, to learn to be able to not be good, and to use it and not use it according to necessity” (Machiavelli 93). In addition, he also believed that men were generally to receive misfortune as they “[were generally] ungrateful, fickle, hypocrites, and dissemblers, evaders of danger, lovers of gain” (Machiavelli 101). He believed that during good times, man would likely seek to be friends with fellow neighbors but that in times of adversity, they would only seek out their own well being and be selfless even if one had previously given them a favor. For this reason, he supports the fact that a prince is better off being feared than loved showing pessimism in the nature of humans. He writes, “Love endures by a bond which men, being scoundrels, may break whenever it serves their advantage to do so; but fear is supported by the dread of pain, which is ever present” (Machiavelli 106). Machiavelli supported keeping people in fear to better control them.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Strength of argument): For Machiavelli, he believes that a prince should be feared than loved by the people and he specifies, “..a wise prince should build his foundation upon that which belongs to him, not upon that which belongs to others; he must strive only to avoid hatred, as has been said” (Jacobus 47). However, in this case, his argument can be flawed and turned against him. (Tempering the Position): Although Machiavelli does a really great significant job of using logic, reason, and history to convince his readers the proper way a prince should rule; however, he didn’t imply support to show how a prince to avoid being hated by his people because, he too knows, that there will be some people who will learn to hate one from their actions they perform. (Conversation): As a matter of fact, I have experienced a situation similar to what Machiavelli doesn’t want to happen. I am not at all a prince, but I have had people hate me for my beliefs, my attitude, or my actions. There was this one time where this girl began to grow this hatred towards me just because I kicked a pit-bull so he wouldn’t bite this little 6-year old I baby sat. My intention wasn’t to harm the dog, but it was the only way to buy me some time to be able carry the boy back inside my house safely. Even though this act I committed was considered animal cruelty, I had to do it to save the child. However, the girl still went against me on this action, so there goes to show that people can hate someone else because of how they see and…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli makes the point in his essay that people are ultimately naïve and easily manipulated and that in order to be an exceptional leader, you must be unafraid to do what’s necessary to survive the political wilderness. This is not to say that you should go about your power abusing it because you have the power to, but rather use it in situations when it is necessary. He also says that it is more important to be feared then loved but not too feared because then people may get the idea to over throw you.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    So much of what he is saying is simply trust yourself, and find balance in how you rule. Too harsh or too merciful, too transparent or too deceitful, too trusting or too suspicious and you have set yourself up for failure. From Machiavelli's point of view, lacking this ability to walk both sides of the line would make a rise to power difficult and maintaining authority even harder. All of this can be true of a number of situations from a restaurant manager to the President of the United States. You see this theme of balance in chapter 25 when he speaks about a persons power over Fortune.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Best Paper Evvver

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Machiavelli says this because when a Prince is feared people will respect him and do what he says and they will love him and praise him. It is also possible to be both feared and loved but it is very difficult and only great rulers are able to create the balance.…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli became a writer who wrote to inform, to express greatness regarding monarchy, and to add to the world that the changing art of ruling is worth the knowing about. He also expressed that young men deserved to be taught the importance of new ways of ruling, to insure success. During this time, the values of the Renaissance were prominent, teaching the value of individualism and the power each individual possessed. Inadvertently Machiavelli used this to his advantage when instructing young men to become great kings and uses this in his literature to persuade the reader to believe what he is writing. The passion of that period regarding this was at the most passionate it may have ever been, this high regarding the power of the individual, influenced literature in a way that too had never been done before.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In chapter 17, the question “whether it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse” is proposed. Machiavelli states that, ultimately, it would be best to be loved and feared, yet that is not feasible. Thus, “it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one has to lack one of the two.” It is safer to be feared because those who fear you are less likely to rise up against you, and those who love you are quicker to put their self-interest first because there is no fear of repercussions for their actions. Machiavelli words his response well when by stating that “since men love at their convenience and fear at the convenience of the prince, a wise prince should found himself on what is his.”…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli was an Italian state politician and well-known person of the Renaissance. Machiavelli was born on May 3rd, 1469. His father was Bernardo di Niccoli who came from an impoverished part of Florentine, there is little recorded about Machiavelli’s father. Machiavelli lived in Florence at a time of constant war and endangerment of other forces such as France, Spain and the Holy Roman Empire all of which had an interest in Italy (quite possibly the main reason for Machiavelli’s philosophy). Machivelli was a major player in military dealings he had many diplomatic assignments. He met with the likes of Ferdinand II of Aragón, in Spain and to the Papacy in Rome, in the Italian states. Machiavelli examined Duke Cesare Borgia(son of the pope Alexander VI) who was a very important figure in the The Prince.…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli emphasizes that if one cannot be both loved and fear, it is better to be…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Prince, Machiavelli uses his didactic essay to offer practical advice on how to rule a city like sixteenth-century Florence, he states that a successful prince must display virtu which is shown to translate into strength and skill. Machiavelli advocates the swift ruthlessness of brutal tyrants and acknowledges very little to what it means to be moral. In chapter eight ‘states won by crime’, he states that a leader “should calculate the sum of all the injuries he will have to do, and do them all at once”- through this high modality statement, Machiavelli is only concerned with the maintenance of power, rather than the morals surrounding it. This idea for the brutality of tyrants is used as justification which can be seen throughout Julius Caesar. Shakespeare demonstrates that a successful leader must be expedient, amoral (is this the correct term?) and ruthless and this is no better shown then through the character of Caesar who pronounces himself as “dictator for life”. Caesar states that “The gods are showing disapproval of cowardice… Caesar would be a beast without a heart if he stayed home today from fear”. The visual imagery shows Caesars ambition and strong tyrannical hold over Rome, it shows that he has no fear and will not be stopped- this is what Machiavelli argues is needed in order to…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Prince was dedicated to a ruler named Lorenzo de Medici, son of Piero de Medici, ruler of Florence 1471-1503. The Discourses was dedicated to Zanobi Buondelmonti and Cosimo Rucellai, both men of intellect. Both books, however, outline the necessity for a strong ruler in the development of a community.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This belief is the major driving force behind his argument that a king or prince is to be the highest authority in society. Furthermore, according to Machiavelli, the greatest moral good is preserving a stable state, and the actions to maintain a country, no matter how cruel, is always justified. The acquiring and maintaining of power is what interests Machiavelli the most and because human nature is so instinctively evil and untrustworthy, it takes a strong authoritative figure, like a king, to control its citizens. A prince must exhibit certain principalities and rule by force rather than by law. It is imperative that a prince do whatever is necessary to sustain power, and while the goal of a prince is not to be hated, Machiavelli feels it is much better to be feared than loved.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays