Preview

Comparing The Vanderbilt And Rockefeller: Captains Of The Industry

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
365 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing The Vanderbilt And Rockefeller: Captains Of The Industry
In a sense, Vanderbilt and Rockefeller are captains of the industry but only by using a capitalist approach with intensive labor. Using false hopes for the immigrants that wanted a better life. Feeding them lies and poor wages which explains their robber baron intent. These men upon lucky made their wealth. The fact is that these millionaires trapped people into the notion that American dream to work hard and you too can obtain wealth. Understanding that social Darwinism implements the survival of the fittest in social and political stance is basically a one-way streak. People who have the right upbringings and domination over the lower class. Economic divisions are mostly important to wealth and inherited wealth they don’t want to be in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    John D. Rockefeller has earned a spot in the hall of shame. He became wealthy because of ruthless and dishonorable business tactics which then hurt the nation. Rockefeller became wealthy because, he lowered his prices way down and forced the Pennsylvania Railroad to lower their prices, and he also ran smaller companies out of business and then took them over for his own. After he took over most of the smaller businesses, he raised his own prices back up in order to bring in a bigger profit. Rockefeller’s robber baron side was reflected by this action because, he went behind people’s backs and turned the other way when it came to business partners.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morgan,Rockefeller and Carnegie were robber barons They were considered cruel and ruthless. Carnegie made his employees work long hours and gave them little pay he even tried to stop unions in his company. Employees pointed out that Rockefeller could have paid his workers a fairer wage and settled for being a half billionaire. Morgan criticized for creating monopolies by making it difficult for any business to compete against his.…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    These men were robber barons. They treated their workers very poorly. Rockefeller would make his workers work long desilet hours for very little pay. Carnage made his employees work long hours and little pay. He even tried to stop unios in his company. Carnegie competed fiercely in business and tried to squash organized labor. Rockefeller, and Carnegie were robber barons. It explains how they treated their workers very badly and how little they paid them.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    “If he had been able to liquidate his $100 million estate to American purchasers at full market value, he would have received about $1 out of every $9 in existence.” (569) Cornelius Vanderbilt lived an “epic life” by fighting through unthinkable adversity to rise from basically rags to unimaginable riches. In the First Tycoon: The Epic Life of Cornelius Vanderbilt, by T.J. Stiles, Cornelius Vanderbilt’s attitude towards competitiveness in the American business enterprise slowly transformed in the different stages of his life as he shaped American business. Stiles did a great job of breaking up Vanderbilt’s life in to three stages in his life: Captain, Commodore, and King. All three were equally important parts of his life, and during each stage his attitude towards a competitive business enterprise changed.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    2000 Dbq Analysis

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Carnegie did believe in survival of the fittest and that the rich was more competent and educated than the poor, middle class but, he also believed in aiding the less fortunate in a non-direct way by “ ...bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience and ability to administer,...”(Doc 4). In controlling multiple industries he provided the less fortunate with jobs and work experience, bettering them in a non-direct way. John D. Rockefeller on the other hand believed in boosting himself using horizontal integration, monopolizing the smaller businesses, expanding his industry further and further. Rockefeller once had monopolized almost 90% of the oil and oil refining businesses. He lowered his prices to attract a customer base slowly eliminating all of his competitors by either buying them out or forcing them out of business, to then jack up his prices once he owned most of the industry. Because of his monopoly in the oil industry he and the railroad tycoon Vanderbilt were in league together giving “discriminating rates” to outside , small business competitors (Doc 7). In 1890 the Sherman Antitrust Act was passed to…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cornelius Vanderbilt was well known for how he reached the top from how low he started at. His parents worked real hard to earn money. His dad worked as ferrying cargo and passengers between Staten Island and Manhattan. At the age of 11 Cornelius quit school to work with his dad doing ferrying cargo and passengers between Staten Island and Manhattan. The beginning of his business started off in 1817 when he saw potential in a new technology so he partnered with Thomas Gibbons in a steamship business. While working with Thomas he learned how to manage a large commercial operation and became a quick study in legal matters. Today he would be worth 200 billion federal reserved notes. Even today he is continuing something.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.P. Morgan was born into a wealthy family and inherited it, while Vanderbilt went from rags to riches, which definitely makes him a captain of industry. Because of this, it makes sense of how they manage their money as they got older. J.P. Morgan was not driven by a tremendous desire for money but for setting finances right and doing things the right way. Although he did .P. Morgan buy and collect art that was equal in value to about two-thirds of his estate or 900 million dollars today. This makes sense because he was born into a wealthy family so he can be generous with his money because it’s always been there for him. Vanderbilt was more greedy with his money. He never spent his money on improving working conditions, even though they were extremely dangerous.The only thing he spent his money on was $50,000 to the Church of the Strangers and $1 million to Central University, which then became Vanderbilt University and improving the railroads for customers. Other than that, he kept all his money to himself. The reason for that is because he had to work to get to where he was and he didn’t want to lose it all so sometimes he had to play dirty with his money by making cuts and only giving his money to his sons instead of his daughters. He left the bulk of his fortune, estimated at more than $100 million, to his son William…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The industrialists were captains of industry because they Put in time and effort into making the economy stronger and bigger. Captains of industry are considered people who are very high on the social chain. Carnegie & Rockefeller were both considered captains of industry rather than robber barons because they did more good rather than bad. These people benefited society and helped created better or stronger ideas that helped businesses or helped save lives. These industrialists weren’t considered robber barons because they weren’t harming the environment, society and they weren’t robbing people of their innocence and freedom, they were helping people live better lives.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cornelius Vanderbilt was an entrepreneur in the railroad and shipping business. Vanderbilt was a self-made multi-millionaire who became one of the wealthiest Americans of the 19th century. Cornelius Vanderbilt was born on May 27, 1794, in the Port Richmond area of Staten Island, New York. During his childhood he worked with his father, who was also in the transportation business. Vanderbilt’s father shipped cargo from Staten Island, New York, where they lived, and Manhattan.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has come to my attention that during the late 1800’s there has been many industries that shaped the rules and regulations of our society today. There have been many names that these companies have been named but two of them really stand out to me. They are “Captains of Industry,” and “Robber Barons.” I firmly believe that these companies can be looked at as “Robber Barons” instead of “Captains of Industry” because these companies take advantage of their employees (including children), they leave the people powerless, and also, they eventually leave these poor citizens unemployed.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the American Civil War came to an end, an era of phenomenal economic growth was spurred by a second Industrial Revolution. It touched all geographic areas of America, evident in increased farm output and labor efficiency. The magnificent flow of goods generated could be efficiently transported by freshly lain transcontinental railroads made of Bessemer steel. Presiding over these late nineteenth century developments was a new class of extremely wealthy industrialists, the main beneficiaries of the era’s prosperity. They dominated substantial sectors of the new economy such as steel, oil, banking, and rail transportation. While these individuals created and donated outstanding wealth, they also engineered one of American history’s most corrupt and unequally heterogeneous time periods, dubbed the Gilded Age by Mark Twain. Such ambiguity blurs the legacy of these incredible few, who some call “robber barons” and other call “captains of industry”. However, neither polarity is completely accurate. The wealthiest Americans during the Gilded Age had both positive and negative effects on American society.…

    • 2538 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before his twentieth birthday, John asked for a one thousand dollar loan from his father to start his own business. Of course, at the prevailing interest rate, and payable on demand. With this money, John Rockefeller, along with a neighbor Maurice Clark, started Clark & Rockefeller; commission merchants in grain, hay, meats, and miscellaneous goods. Business for the first year was good, bringing in a $450,000 gross with profits of $4,400. Continuing the commodity business, profits were $17,000 the very next year.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Captains of Industry

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since the time of its birth, the United States has been a democracy that was pieced together by the beliefs and ideas of different people. This has resulted in a system in which nothing can be classified as “black or white” and there are many areas of gray. Therefore, it is difficult to label anything as a singular extreme. This is the case for the leaders of the industrial period. While they made unusual advancements that greatly helped the public, they also caused many problems that proved to be quite harmful. While the Industrialists of the late 19th Century were indeed Captains of Industry, they were only able to reach that level by using the power they obtained.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Captains of Industry

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the late 1800s and early 1900s, during the climax of the American Industrial Revolution, there was a small group of men who owned the major businesses and were leaders of their industries. They owned factories, railroads, banks, and even created company towns for the sole purpose of housing their workers. Due to the efforts of these few men, the U.S. economy became the envy of the world, and America became a leading world power. They provided the public with products that were in high demand for reasonable prices, and opened their markets to countries overseas. Although many people believe the early industrialists were Robber Barons who exploited the poor, these great men were truly Captains of Industry who created new ways of doing business, and provided products and services to the public; moreover, they were generous philanthropists who contributed much to society.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    More often than not, America’s antebellum capitalists are accused of being the “robber barons” of industrial America. The misconception is that these men took advantage of a naïve and growing economy and reaped its benefits without giving anything in return. True, the majority of America was poor in comparison to the few elites, but the philanthropist efforts and contributions of these men cannot be denied. If not for these men and their efforts, there would have been no one to pave the road to America’s industrial domination.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays